R
Rau
Guest
Do you experience any kinds of “obsessions” in your life?I am very, very grateful to and thankful for the people on this thread who have tried to help me see a different angle so that I can overcome my concern.
Do you experience any kinds of “obsessions” in your life?I am very, very grateful to and thankful for the people on this thread who have tried to help me see a different angle so that I can overcome my concern.
Apparently this one.Do you experience any kinds of “obsessions” in your life?
In all seriousness, I don’t believe that I do in the way that I think you mean.Do you experience any kinds of “obsessions” in your life?
It was a deceptive question to begin with.@steve-b He’s referencing this quote from the Pope, where the Pope is not saying that God doesn’t exist PERIOD, but rather that false ideas of him are incorrect. That God is not simply some unreachable far off being, but rather is near at hand. Here’s the full context:
“You pray - said the Pope - with a friend, who is your companion on life’s journey, you pray with the Father and you pray in the Holy Spirit. The friend is Jesus”:
“He accompanies us and teaches us to pray. And our prayer should be Trinitarian. So often [people ask]: ‘But do you believe?’: 'Yes! Yes! '; ‘What do you believe in?’; ‘In God!’; ‘But what is God for you?’; ‘God, God’. But God does not exist: Do not be shocked! So God does not exist! There is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, they are persons, they are not some vague idea in the clouds … This God spray does not exist! The three persons exist! Jesus is our companion on the journey who gives us what we ask; the Father who cares for us and loves us; and the Holy Spirit is the gift, the extra gift from the Father, that our consciousness does not dare to hope for”.
The Holy Father EXPLICITLY states that God exists in Three Persons, then enumerates each one of the Three Persons. How much clearer can he possibly get?
Yes, I remember that quote, and you know what? I think Pope Francis borrowed that from St. Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians:He asked me about something the Pope recently said, “Christ failed on the cross” but didn’t give me the context. He said that in any context he couldn’t imagine Christ failing in any way on the cross.
…
What is your take on this? Have you heard of that quote?
If you get a chance, pass that along to the evangelist who asked you about it.1 Corinthians 1:18-25
The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written:
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
and the learning of the learned I will set aside.”
Where is the wise one? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made the wisdom of the world foolish? For since in the wisdom of God the world did not come to know God through wisdom, it was the will of God through the foolishness of the proclamation to save those who have faith. For Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom, but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those who are called, Jews and Greeks alike, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.
Apparently you left out the context. That makes the question and the charge, deceptive.steve-b:![]()
Rome. I did not mean to be deceptive. I wanted to know what people thought of what was said.Who is this bishop? Where is he?
Quote-mining is inherently deceptive.Exactly where was I deceptive?
There was another thread that hashed out the Greek text for the Our Father and whether it would be acceptable to change the English translation.Let me ask you, why wouldn’t a Catholic give the Pope the benefit of the doubt?
This is what I was trying to do. I looked at his comments in light of infallible Church teaching on the Trinity, and it scared me that he said those things.If you’re Catholic, you believe the Pope is also. And that his words should be interpreted as a Catholic.
But they (apart from the tiniest deeply misguided minority) do NOT think that the Pope was even hinting that he doesn’t believe in God’s existence! Not at all! Not close!De_Maria:![]()
There was another thread that hashed out the Greek text for the Our Father and whether it would be acceptable to change the English translation.Let me ask you, why wouldn’t a Catholic give the Pope the benefit of the doubt?
The main argument against changing it could be stated as “Why wouldn’t a Catholic give almost 2000 years of unanimous Church teaching the benefit of the doubt?”
The main argument for changing it was, “Because of pastoral concerns: people hear ‘lead us not into temptation’ and think we mean God tempts us. We don’t want to confuse people.”
In this case, you ask, “why wouldn’t a Catholic give the Pope the benefit of the doubt?”
The best explanation I can give is this:
“Because of pastoral concerns. People hear that he said, ‘God does not exist,’ and think he means what he said. We don’t want to confuse people.”
You are very right about this.I think it’s also worth mentioning that this is from a homily Pope Francis gave at Santa Marta (i.e. where he lives). These homilies are much more informal and off the cuff. These homilies do not appear on the Vatican website under his homilies. They don’t receive the same amount of attention towards translation. There is no “official” translation. All you get are snippets of translations in news articles.
Well, I did. And I was worried. Call me all the names many people here have if you want (though I am grateful that you didn’t) but I was being sincere in my concern.If you look at the larger context, I don’t see how anyone could walk away thinking that the Pope is either an atheist or that he denies the oneness of God. That’s not a reasonable nor fair characterization of Pope Francis’ thoughts.
That was not my experience. I heard about this homily from a Hindu man (one who accepts Buddha, something to do with the Vedas and the Bhagavad Gita, which is entirely beside the point) who used it to throw my Catholic beliefs in my face.But they (apart from the tiniest deeply misguided minority) do NOT think that the Pope was even hinting that he doesn’t believe in God’s existence! Not at all! Not close!
Lol!Most people here believe my interpretation was inherently flawed. And that I am too. The first might be true, the second definitely is.
Put your faith in the Holy Spirit. For 2000 years, He’s protected the Catholic Church. If you don’t trust the Pope, trust Him.I don’t want to continue to believe the Pope said something un-Catholic.
So one Hindu/Busdhist person (who toy seem to think can neither be in the minority nor misguided) takes the Pope’s words to mean what, exactly?LilyM:![]()
That was not my experience. I heard about this homily from a Hindu man (one who accepts Buddha, something to do with the Vedas and the Bhagavad Gita, which is entirely beside the point) who used it to throw my Catholic beliefs in my face.But they (apart from the tiniest deeply misguided minority) do NOT think that the Pope was even hinting that he doesn’t believe in God’s existence! Not at all! Not close!
I never thought the Holy Father doesn’t believe in God’s existence, but I was worried that his teaching was problematic according to Catholic teaching on the Trinity, which is central to our faith.
So I asked Catholics what they thought.
If you’d like, you could read the posts in this thread and see if your accusations were already made and responded to.So one Hindu/Busdhist person (who toy seem to think can neither be in the minority nor misguided) takes the Pope’s words to mean what, exactly?
So the Hindu/Buddhist (who, I repeat, you seem to think cannot possibly be in the minority or misguided) thinks.the Pope is not Trinitarian?LilyM:![]()
If you’d like, you could read the posts in this thread and see if your accusations were already made and responded to.So one Hindu/Busdhist person (who toy seem to think can neither be in the minority nor misguided) takes the Pope’s words to mean what, exactly?