“that they may all be one, as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may be in us, that the world may believe that you sent me”
Because it is not unclear?I don’t understand why the pope won’t clarify his statement?
bingo… I know this will be a bit provocative, but the word ‘clarify’ is often used these days to express disagreement; meaning I disagree with what you said, so could you say it in a way that I agree with.Because it is not unclear?
The Pope said clearly and unequivocally that states should adopt civil union laws for same sex couples, yes. It was not unclear, or cryptic. Nor was it really a surprise, that is the same position he took as a Cardinal.So you’re saying the Pope has clearly supported same-sex civil-unions?
Why does he need the benefit of any doubt? It is a perfectly reasonable position for him to take. BTW, the Cardinals that voted him to be Pope obviously knew this was his view - it was very well known and public. So it seems the majority of Cardinals were not troubled by it, either.I certainly hope you’re wrong. I don’t disagree that it seems clear enough, though. People are asking for clarity because they are hoping it just isn’t true, that the Holy Father didn’t mean it in the way it was presented, etc. They’re trying to give the Holy Father the benefit of the doubt. And I don’t deny that that is difficult at this point.
And there we will have to agree to disagree, and strongly at that.It is a perfectly reasonable position for him to take.
OK, that’s fine. As I said, the Pope and the majority of the College of Cardinals find it reasonable, but obviously everyone has a right to disagree.And there we will have to agree to disagree, and strongly at that.
The church doesn’t, the difference needs to be reconciled. There is a need for clarification. Is he changing the position of the church?The Pope said clearly and unequivocally that states should adopt civil union laws for same sex couples,
As do I…Catholic apologist Dave Armstrong considers Bishop Schneider to be a “radical Catholic reactionary.”
The big to do is a Catholic Pope possibly (again, trying to give the benefit of the doubt here) supporting civil-unions for same-sex couples.I honestly don’t understand what the big to do is…
Supporting laws that protect people in SS civil unions doesn’t seem like a scandal to many.The big to do is a Catholic Pope possibly (again, trying to give the benefit of the doubt here) supporting civil-unions for same-sex couples.