Yeah…and it was just as essential 41 years ago!Citing a prevalent lack of catechesis since the 1970s, Cardinal Donald Wuerl says that a bishop’s role as teacher is particularly essential today
The first and primary educators of the children are the parents.I agree. With people unable to even parent, the church has a greater responsiblity to reach kids, youth, and adults with catesis.
This is my pet peeve as well. We, under the tutelege of an orthodox pastor, now have an excellent catechetical series in place. We, as most parishes, are playing catch-up as a result of watered down catechesis and RE directors who don’t even know their own faith! We came to a screeching halt on Lesson #10 this year because the catechism assumed that 12 year-olds knew what a sacrament was! Silly us…and we’ve been scrambling all year long.The first and primary educators of the children are the parents.
If the parents are not up to the task, they need to rise up to it.
Family catechesis therefore precedes, accompanies and enriches all other forms of catechesis. The reason this is so important to stress is that no program, regardless of how good or how bad it is, can replace or undo the goodness or badness of the education children get from parents…from the time the child is born (or, according to some, when he/she is still in the womb). Children learn from seeing. If the children are in an environment that is full of prayer and charity, they will grow up that way. If they are in an environment that is utterly secular, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours per week of religious catechesis will not undo that environment.
The Church certainly can help and should do a better job of helping. Imparting knowledge to the children through CCD and other programs is important and educating parents is also important, but make no mistake: the parents have the duty to be the primary educators and, whether they wish to be or not, are the primary educators of their children.
(Sorry for the rant, but this is a real sore spot with me as a CCD teacher)
My only experience with Lifeteen has been extremely negative. I went to a parish to hear Patrick Madrid speak. There was a mass scheduled right before the speech. I attended that Mass unaware of what Lifeteen was. It was the most repugnant display of liturgical abuse I have ever seen in person.I agree. With people unable to even parent, the church has a greater responsiblity to reach kids, youth, and adults with catesis.
I fully support programs like Lifeteen (with the pre-teen and college programs) because it is ment for people with zero faith formation to learn the basics and grow. It is focused on the Mass and Adoration so kids are in the presance of God while they’re learing.
The church is also focusing on adults through programs like Arise and I think that’s wonderful, too.
(I’m really curious if the new young Detrioit bishop was influenced by lifeteen in any way. It started in '85 so it’s quite possible)
The Cardinal is correct that in the USA catechesis has been a huge problem. However, with few exceptions, I don’t seen any significant improvement today.
Bishops who have control and authority for everything Catholic that happens in their Diocese, have not required that Diocese and Parish Staff work, Priests preach, teachers teach, all 100% in accord with the “Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition”.
Most Seminaries, most Convents, most Catholic Universities (including CUA, the Bishop’s Univeristy) do not use the CCC as a Student Text as part of the core ciriculum.
So if bad catechesis is recognized, when is someone going to do something about it?
When is reading and re-reading of the CCC going to be encouraged at each Parish?
Where is the leadership?![]()
The CCC is for the public. It’s a lengthy, but easy read. Catholicism isn’t rocket surgery.Unfortunatley the CCC is not for the public. It is the equivalent of Tridentine Catechism
You are 100% correct, that PARENTS have the first and main responsibility for teaching their own children.The first and primary educators of the children are the parents.
If the parents are not up to the task, they need to rise up to it.
Since parents have given children their life, they are bound by the most serious obligation to educate their offspring and therefore must be recognized as the primary and principal educators.
- That this right is inviolable St. Thomas proves as follows:The child is naturally something of the father . . . so by natural right the child, before reaching the use of reason, is under the father’s care. Hence it would be contrary to natural justice if the child, before the use of reason, were removed from the care of its parents, or if any disposition were made concerning him against the will of the parents.[21]
And as this duty on the part of the parents continues up to the time when the child is in a position to provide for itself, this same inviolable parental right of education also endures. “Nature intends not merely the generation of the offspring, but also its development and advance to the perfection of man considered as man, that is, to the state of virtue”[22] says the same St. Thomas.
Pope Pius XI, Divini Illius Magestri
Second Vatican Council, Gravissimum Educationis, 7
Parents are the principal and first educators of their children.
Family catechesis therefore precedes, accompanies and enriches all other forms of catechesis. Furthermore, in places where anti- religious legislation endeavors even to prevent education in the faith, and in places where widespread unbelief or invasive secularism makes real religious growth practically impossible, “the church of the home”(120) remains the one place where children and young people can receive an authentic catechesis. Thus there cannot be too great an effort on the part of Christian parents to prepare for this ministry of being their own children’s catechists and to carry it out with tireless zeal. Encouragement must also be given to the individuals or institutions that, through person-to-person contacts, through meetings, and through all kinds of pedagogical means, help parents to perform their task: The service they are doing to catechesis is beyond price.
- The family’s catechetical activity has a special character, which is in a sense irreplaceable. This special character has been rightly stressed by the Church, particularly by the Second Vatican Council.(118) Education in the faith by parents, which should begin from the children’s tenderest age,(119) is already being given when the members of a family help each other to grow in faith through the witness of their Christian lives, a witness that is often without words but which perseveres throughout a day-to-day life lived in accordance with the Gospel. This catechesis is more incisive when, in the course of family events (such as the reception of the sacraments, the celebration of great liturgical feasts, the birth of a child, a bereavement) care is taken to explain in the home the Christian or religious content of these events. But that is not enough: Christian parents must strive to follow and repeat, within the setting of family life, the more methodical teaching received elsewhere. The fact that these truths about the main questions of faith and Christian living are thus repeated within a family setting impregnated with love and respect will often make it possible to influence the children in a decisive way for life. The parents themselves profit from the effort that this demands of them, for in a catechetical dialogue of this sort each individual both receives and gives.
John Paul II, Apostolic Exhoration Catechesi Tradendae
The reason this is so important to stress is that no program, regardless of how good or how bad it is, can replace or undo the goodness or badness of the education children get from parents…from the time the child is born (or, according to some, when he/she is still in the womb). Children learn from seeing. If the children are in an environment that is full of prayer and charity, they will grow up that way. If they are in an environment that is utterly secular, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours per week of religious catechesis will not undo that environment.
The Church certainly can help and should do a better job of helping. Imparting knowledge to the children through CCD and other programs is important and educating parents is also important, but make no mistake: the parents have the duty to be the primary educators and, whether they wish to be or not, are the primary educators of their children.
(Sorry for the rant, but this is a real sore spot with me as a CCD teacher)
Agreed. But then that’s where the catechesis is really needed…in the homes. With the parents.You are 100% correct, that PARENTS have the first and main responsibility for teaching their own children.
But they can not teach what they do not know or understand.
How many Parents today do you think have been encouraged at the Parish level to read the “CCC 2nd Ed” since it was first published in the USA in March 2000?
CCC - "888 Bishops, with priests as co-workers, have as their first task “to preach the Gospel of God to all men,” in keeping with the Lord’s command. They are “heralds of faith, who draw new disciples to Christ; they are authentic teachers” of the apostolic faith “endowed with the authority of Christ.”
Parents and all parishoners over age 15 need to be told on more than one occasion from the Pulpit and Church bulletins and Church web sites - to read the “Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition”.Agreed. But then that’s where the catechesis is really needed…in the homes. With the parents.
The point I’m getting at is that there is no (zero, nada, ain’t gonna happen) way that any CCD course or any program, no matter how meritorious it is, will be able to inculcate the faith into kids if it isn’t lived at home.
If I, as a CCD teacher, teach that divorce and remarriage, without the prior marriages being declared null, is not acceptable in the eyes of God…but half the students live in households where that is exactly the case…how many kids are going to inculcate the message of the Church? If I teach that you should pray every day, but that is not done at home, how many kids are going to take what I teach seriously? If I teach kids to guard their eyes from bad images, yet the parents allow them to watch R rated movies (the ones with nudity and simulated sex), which is the message they’re going to take? If I tell them it’s vitally important to go to confession regularly, yet their parents haven’t darkened the door of a confessional since long before the birth of the child, what is the message the kids are going to live with? If softball, soccer, and football are more important than Mass at home, nothing I say as a CCD teacher is going to change that in a kid’s mind.
The point being that it doesn’t take a huge amount of knowledge at home, but it does take living out the knowledge that you have. With the parents, it is an attitudinal issue more than a knowledge issue. No program in the Church is ever, ever going to change that.
So true. Our priest was talking recently about how some parents just drop their kids off at Mass then come back when it’s over. What kind of message is that to a child?Agreed. But then that’s where the catechesis is really needed…in the homes. With the parents.
The point I’m getting at is that there is no (zero, nada, ain’t gonna happen) way that any CCD course or any program, no matter how meritorious it is, will be able to inculcate the faith into kids if it isn’t lived at home.
If I, as a CCD teacher, teach that divorce and remarriage, without the prior marriages being declared null, is not acceptable in the eyes of God…but half the students live in households where that is exactly the case…how many kids are going to inculcate the message of the Church? If I teach that you should pray every day, but that is not done at home, how many kids are going to take what I teach seriously? If I teach kids to guard their eyes from bad images, yet the parents allow them to watch R rated movies (the ones with nudity and simulated sex), which is the message they’re going to take? If I tell them it’s vitally important to go to confession regularly, yet their parents haven’t darkened the door of a confessional since long before the birth of the child, what is the message the kids are going to live with? If softball, soccer, and football are more important than Mass at home, nothing I say as a CCD teacher is going to change that in a kid’s mind.
The point being that it doesn’t take a huge amount of knowledge at home, but it does take living out the knowledge that you have. With the parents, it is an attitudinal issue more than a knowledge issue. No program in the Church is ever, ever going to change that.
You have referenced the CCC of the Council of Trent - which was the first Catechism.Unfortunatley the CCC is not for the public. It is the equivalent of Tridentine Catechism
archive.org/details/thecatechismofth00donouoft
or for online use
cin.org/users/james/ebooks/master/trent/tindex.htm
for our time.
The Compendium is somewhat better,
vatican.va/archive/compendium_ccc/documents/archive_2005_compendium-ccc_en.html
but still more reference that study material for the laity. And unfortunately there is no definite material for children, like it was the Small Catechism or the Baltimore Catechism.