According to the article, the man was the bishop’s driver. It may be that he was not employed by any Muslim Turks to be their drivers.If the murder wasn’t religiously motivated, why didn’t the man kill a Muslim Turk?
the driver was also receiving treatment for being mentally unstable…According to the article, the man was the bishop’s driver. It may be that he was not employed by any Muslim Turks to be their drivers.
i find this horrible act suspicious and, personally, don’t know if i share the belief that it was not religiously or politically motivated. if the driver was unstable, perhaps he did just snap. i believe it is possible that we will never know the true motivation for the killing.I presume the authorities have their reasons (which I will assume are legitimate and not PR-related) for not believing it was not religiously- or politically-motivated. Though if the driver was a sleeper assassin deep-undercover for a militant group, or was religiously- or politically-motivated as a lone assassin, it’s possible we might never know.
How disgusting that the murderer drags the good name of this bishop in the mud when he is dead and cannot defend himself.The bishop was stabbed in the house and beheaded outside. He cried help before he died. The murderer shouted “Allah Akbar!”. The alleged insanity of the murderer is now to be excluded. There is no medical certificate to prove it. Murat Altun accuses the dead bishop of being a homosexual. Turkish minister of justice condemns the murder and promises to shed light on the incident.
…a number of details are unclear (it would seem that there is no medical record of the alleged murderer depression) is to be hoped that the Turkish authorities want to go through with the search for truth, investigating circle of contacts and relationships with environments Murat turkish nationalism or Islamic fundamentalist organizations.
terrasanta.net/tsx/articolo.jsp?wi_number=2331&wi_codseq= &language=itThe killing of Mgr. Padovese explain some observers, could have a strong symbolic meaning if you include his role as President of the Turkish Bishops’ Conference and the coincidence in time of the event: a few hours from the Pope’s trip to Cyprus. A terrible warning against the Catholic Church by organizations and groups who see openness and dialogue with Islam as a tremendous threat to their power and their ability to manipulate consciences.
The MSM and some Western governments seem to carefully avoid words like “jihadi” or “terrorist” at all, certainly not in the same paragraph as “Muslim” or “Islam.” That is a whole thread in itself, probably.We may never know the truth about this.he was beheaded? i hadn’t heard that. he shouted allah akhbar?
sounds like islamic violence against a Catholic to me.
Analyst Fr. Fillippo di Giacomo, who writes for publications such as L’Unitá and La Stampa, revealed that “hours before Padovese was killed, the Turkish Government called him to say that his driver, who they themselves had put in his service four years before, had gotten out of hand. That is to say, he had embraced the fundamentalist cause.”
Speaking to the Spanish daily El Pais, Fr. di Giacomo added that “knowing this, Padovese canceled the tickets he had reserved to Cyprus for himself and Altun (his driver). He preferred to stay home rather than to make the trip because he feared that his driver would take advantage of his proximity to the Pope and make an attempt on his life.”
that is weird. perhaps this is what angered the driver. maybe he did have plans to hurt the Pope and when those plans were cancelled, he killed the Bishop instead.The MSM and some Western governments seem to carefully avoid words like “jihadi” or “terrorist” at all, certainly not in the same paragraph as “Muslim” or “Islam.” That is a whole thread in itself, probably.We may never know the truth about this.
And the story keeps getting weirder and weirder:
Bishop Padovese canceled Cyprus trip to avoid assassination of Pope
good point!!Why are we so reticent to acknowledge that we are engaged in a struggle against Islam? This seems to be pretty clear. The killer, being the Bishop’s driver, was a trusted person. If this man couldn’t be trusted who can be?
atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/06/italian-bishop-beheaded-by-muslim-in-islamic-ritual.html
There seems to be no question but that he was Muslim. It is a fact that his family was Muslim, and so it is most likely that he remained since converts from Islam can be murdered. Some reports mention “an alleged conversion” to Catholicism.I But this killing had nothing to do with Muslims there is no evidence in the papers I have seen saying that he was Muslim and let’s not forget he was being treated for mental illness as well.
But in a country where the Christian minority has suffered violence and intimidation at the hands of Islamic extremists, some Catholics note that several recent violent attacks such as the murder of Fr. Andrea Santoro in February 2006 have been attributed to young men who were described as emotionally unstable and later revealed to be linked with Islamic militants.
According to hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/14930010.asp?gid=373 the family is Muslim (which means he was Muslim), and he twice called out the “adhan,” the Muslim call to prayer, during his initial court appearance.According to recent reports, Altun the man charged with killing Bishop Padovese reportedly shouted “Allah Akbar!” after repeatedly stabbing the prelate, then boasted of having killed “the great Satan.”
…]
But no evidence or history of emotional disturbance has been made public.
There seems to be no question but that he was Muslim. It is a fact that his family was Muslim, and so it is most likely that he remained since converts from Islam can be murdered. Some reports mention “an alleged conversion” to Catholicism.
It is not a fact that he was being treated for mental illness. The opposite seems true, as people who knew him said he was sane.
“Archbishop Ruggero Franceschini is in Italy to attend the funeral of Msgr. Luigi Padovese in Milan. He confirms the death by Islamic ritual of the Vicar of Anatolia. He also confirms the sanity of the assassin, he has known him for a long time.” Archbishop of Smyrna: The martyrdom of bishop Padovese we want the truth and not “pious lies”
The defense of “temporary insanity” was proposed, I believe, by his defense lawyer; of course, the lawyer will say anything to help his client. Statements by defense lawyers are not necessarily facts.
speroforum.com/a/34418/Turkey-Questions-emerge-over-murder-of-Bishop-Padovese
According to hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/14930010.asp?gid=373 the family is Muslim (which means he was Muslim), and he twice called out the “adhan,” the Muslim call to prayer, during his initial court appearance.
There is no way we can at this stage verify that the murder had nothing to do with Muslims or Islam.
We may never know the truth, given that it happened in Turkey, a country which controls its press.
yes, it would be nice if all religions could live in peace, but i think that will not be in my time.okay don’t want to start an argument so let me just finish with this I’m praying that one day all of this killing will stop and people from all religions can live in peace. With that I leave this thread.