Black Lives Matter is a state-backed religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter silentwitness
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

silentwitness

Guest
For me Black Lives Matter is but one cult movement coming out of Left Wing Secularism.

It is the Left Wing Secularism, underpinned by socialist philosophy; taught through the state education system and supported by media that is the new state based religion.

Because it is not explicitly recognised as a religion it can infiltrate all of the government and public spaces that have legally been mandated to be religious free zones.

People’s natural wish to make common cause is also a factor in support. In the public sphere, Left wing secularism can be that common cause while Christianity, by law, cannot.

This unequal treatment is the inevitable outcome of the ‘equality morality’ that ironically places one religion above all others. That religion, not surprisingly, is Left wing secularism itself and any ‘faith and morals’ it pontificates as true or ‘worthy of belief’. Heretics are deplorables, guilty of newly defined hate crimes who deserve to be cancelled.

Therefore the ‘equality’ morality of Left wing secularism is little more than religious dictatorship .


 
Last edited:
Left wing secularism itself and any ‘faith and morals’ it pontificates as true or ‘worthy of belief’.
Yes. BLM is a new addition to an old story. I just posted 2009 video on another thread. It is many things. It is the “God of Weather” or “Goddess Mother Nature” and the order is reversed from Christianity to make man at the bottom and the earth at the top as supreme.

Left wing secularism is a religion and actually all money donated to it is tax free also.
 
Last edited:
Sigh, threads like this came up in the Philosophy sub-forum frequently; equating some philosophical, political, or ideological position to a religion. Even football fans were seen as engaging in their "religion."It probably doesn’t help that there isn’t a widely agreed criteria for when some set of attributes constitutes a “religion.”
 
It is the Left Wing Secularism, underpinned by socialist philosophy; taught through the state education system and supported by media that is the new state based religion.

Because it is not explicitly recognised as a religion it can infiltrate all of the government and public spaces that have legally been mandated to be religious free zones.
Yes and it squeezes any other thought by financially going after any opposing view. It helped pull T-Mobile adds from Tucker Carlson. T- Mobile phones has long funded abortion.

Lego backed off promoting all police characters. They have always had police cars and policemen figures.
According to ToyBook, an email sent by Rakuten Linkshare on behalf of the Lego Group requested the company’s partners to remove product listings for more than 30 products, including the Lego City Police Station, Mobile Command Center and Police Highway Arrest sets.
It squeezed Alex Jones when Visa refused to allow any transfer of money.
 
Last edited:
This unequal treatment is the inevitable outcome of the ‘equality morality’ that ironically places one religion above all others. That religion, not surprisingly, is Left wing secularism itself and any ‘faith and morals’ it pontificates as true or ‘worthy of belief’. Heretics are deplorables, guilty of newly defined hate crimes who deserve to be cancelled.
Please verify how this secularism is, as a religion, placed above others. Please don’t confuse it with pluralism in our society; you know, all that ‘e pluribus unum’ stuff.
 
It is many things. It is the “God of Weather” or “Goddess Mother Nature” and the order is reversed from Christianity to make man at the bottom and the earth at the top as supreme.
PLM - Pachamama Lives Matter.
 
Last edited:
Left wing secularism is a religion and actually all money donated to it is tax free also.
I actually think it is funded by the state and supported by media.

If it wasn’t, it would collapse almost overnight in my opinion.
 
Obviously they are state sponsored, we’ve seen the government give them a virtually endless supply of tear gas and pepper spray.
 
I actually think it is funded by the state and supported by media.

If it wasn’t, it would collapse almost overnight in my opinion.
Its funded by certain wealthy individuals like Intel(Gordon and Betty Moore), Soros , Hewlett and Packard, Rockefeller, Gates and even Vanguard and Fidelity . It is dark money so donors identity is kept secret. Then if preys on other corporations to conform (or donate money.)

They do filter large sums of money from the US tax payers in groups like Environmental Protection agency., and health care.

Squeeze and squeeze and we saw that with T Mobile. T-Mobile always funded abortion rights but then pulled it’s ads from Tucker Carlson.show.
 
Last edited:
T Mobile USA is on Stock exchange selling for $105.00 a share can’t be too defunct. It also owns Sprint.Mobile.
 
Last edited:
Obviously they are state sponsored, we’ve seen the government give them a virtually endless supply of tear gas and pepper spray.
This is the thing - the violence we have seen from the police against the BLM and related protestors proves that the state does not back it. They even broke up a peaceful violin vigil for Elijah McClain, that boy murdered by the cops in August of last year. I can’t add a link because I’m on mobile, I can only offer this - .

Honestly I wish I could do a thread of loads of videos of police violence that people are posting on Twitter. It’s honestly insane how hard the police are coming down on these protests, even stuff that is peaceful. I can only assume that statements about BLM being state-sponsored come from ignorance.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if T Mobile owns EE? It does own Sprint Mobile.
This stands for everything everywhere and is the largest communications company to provide mobile and fixed internet to Orange and T-mobile customers in the UK. Its been put in place for the new 4G network or 4GEE. This little symbol (EE) in the corner of your phone instead of it saying Orange or T-mobile doesn’t account to much at the moment though and chances are it won’t.
 
Last edited:
It is. Here in the USA we have four three major carriers. AT&T, Verizon, T-M9bile, and Sprint.

T-mobike is the third largest.

After that we have a bunch brands of the major carriers (ex: Metro=T-Mobile, Cricket=AT&T) of MVNOs that are serviced through these carriers.

In all fairness with the various mergers and splits it can be hard to track. Especially with AT&T

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
British Telecommunications if I am reading correctly started out as a government owned group in the UK and then went public allowing for share holders and selling off its holding. Now it is major corporation. Why does it stock only sell for a little over a $1 a share?

T Mobile US is pro-abortion but now has been squeezed further to stop ads on Tucker Carlson show.
 
Last edited:
T- MobileUS (Sprint) which which has 52,000 employees and sells on the stock exchange for $105. a share shows its parent company is in Bonn Germany.

It looks like Deutche Telekom (employs 216,000 )owns 43 per cent share in T Mobile and Deutche Telekon also owns 12% in British Telecommunications(owns EE)… German state owns 32% of company.

From wikipedia on Deutche Telekom…
As of April 2020, the German government holds a 14.5% stake in company stock directly, and another 17.4% through the government bank
On April 1, 2020, Sprint completed the merger with T-Mobile US, making T-Mobile US the owner of Sprint and becoming its subsidiary until the Sprint brand is phased out. The merger also led to SoftBank Group, the then-owner of Sprint to hold up to 24% of New T-Mobile’s shares while Deutsche Telekom holds up to 43% of its shares. The remaining 33% is since held by public shareholders.
Japan’s SoftBank is dumping its shares now because it owned Sprint and made $$ when Sprint merged as Sprint stock rose 73%.


Another major corporation wielding power. No wonder abortion funding T-Mobile(Sprint) squeezed Tucker Carson. by taking ads off his show.
 
Last edited:
“State sponsored” is vague and probably inaccurate. It’s certainly supported by the Democrat party. If you listen to the founding BLM members and current leadership, as well as look at their web page, they stand for Marxism and breaking up the nuclear family. The political philosophy playbook of Marxism is well documented, and it certainly involves destablizing the culture. As for breaking up the nuclear family, what a horrible stance. A strong nuclear family produces the best living environment for a child. I would assume the fact that, depending on the culture and race, some to many people aren’t raised in a nuclear family household. I would speculate, given the leftist ideology, that this isn’t “fair”, and thus, we can’t allow people to prosper from it, especially since two parent households are rare in black households nowadays. I would imagine it’s already been assigned “privilege” to have a mom and a dad who stayed married, as if it’s a bad thing. What a crazy time we live in.

I think it’s easy to sit back in a recliner and judge the actions of all police in their every move while ignoring the violence and pressure they’re surrounded by. If I’m an officer and I’ve been punched, kicked, had bricks and molotov cocktails thrown at me, been shot at, and just verbally assaulted for days and days… I might be on edge too. I find it odd that so many will jump all over the cop and pretend like the amount of violence in these protests was minimal. It was not “mostly peaceful” in most major cities for a few weeks. It was mainstream violence across the board. Widespread arson, violence, looting, vandalism, and the assault and battery of innocents within the riot zones… which leftist mayors and governors failed to protect. They threw the innocent storeowners and city civilians under the bus, afraid to stand against the violent aspects of a racial movement, afraid of the woke mob and being branded a “racist”. They should be charged for abandoning the innocent civilians they have sworn to protect.

I mean, just ask yourself. If a bunch of angry white people burned down hundreds of buildings, vandalized, stole, caused deaths and assaults across the entire country… even if there were peaceful protests among it all… would it be represented by our media overlords as “mostly peaceful”?

I think we all know the answer to that. Double standards are afoot.
 
How much does Vanguard contribute? I inherited an account from them so it’s important for me to know.
 
How much does Vanguard contribute? I inherited an account from them so it’s important for me to know.
Before you go cancelling anything, Vanguard is a major stock company. Many companies have endowment programs and it may be set up for certain investors. I believe that it how it works so these companies are just go between for investors. This is different from Intel(Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation).

I do not see a figure on how the contribution work and it could be that they also have employee type contributions in place… I am not sure how it works with Vanguard. Charitable Endowment. Here is the site where I saw Vanguard, Fidelity and Charles Swab.

 
Last edited:
The education system that teaches values and history is state sponsored.

The judicial system with appointed judges under political DA’'s is state sponsored.

The police system that is largely being told to stand down is state sponsored.

The political system which make laws are state sponsored.

The value system of all those institutions cannot by law be overtly religious especially where state collected money is concerned. They can however have an overt value system that is not deemed religious.

Left wing secularism based on socialist philosophy can set itself up overtly in those systems.

Because a society needs an overt value system, there is a strong arming of these values on society with the use of publicly collected money.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top