M
Mannyfit75
Guest
Have you read the next Tractate Number 26:A number of church fathers did not interpret John 6 in exactly the way that the Catholic Church does. That is not to say some ot them may not have believed in the Real Presence but they didn’t necessarily derive it from John 6.
The Orthodox Church believed in the Real Presence.
For example Augustine says:
Tractates on John Number 25
newadvent.org/fathers/1701025.htm
The eating that Augustine sees is not with the teeth and stomach but simply by believing.He further says that accepting what Jesus said literally would involve enjoining a vice or crime so it must be figurative.
Carl,
Here is what Augustine later say:
I hardly think St. Augustine thinks it is symbolic.
- But that which they ask, while striving among themselves, namely, how the Lord can give His flesh to be eaten, they do not immediately hear: but further it is said to them, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, you will have no life in you.” How, indeed, it may be eaten, and what may be the mode of eating this bread, you are ignorant of; nevertheless, “except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, you will not have life in you.” He spoke these words, not certainly to corpses, but to living men. Whereupon, lest they, understanding it to mean this life, should strive about this thing also, He going on added, “Whoso eats my flesh, and drinks my blood, has eternal life.” Wherefore, he that eats not this bread, nor drinks this blood, has not this life; for men can have temporal life without that, but they can noways have eternal life. He then that eats not His flesh, nor drinks His blood, has no life in him; and he that eats His flesh, and drinks His blood, has life. This epithet, eternal, which He used, answers to both. It is not so in the case of that food which we take for the purpose of sustaining this temporal life. For he who will not take it shall not live, nor yet shall he who will take it live. For very many, even who have taken it, die; it may be by old age, or by disease, or by some other casualty. But in this food and drink, that is, in the body and blood of the Lord, it is not so. For both he that does not take it has no life, and he that does take it has life, and that indeed eternal life. And thus He would have this meat and drink to be understood as meaning the fellowship of His own body and members, which is the holy Church in his predestinated, and called, and justified, and glorified saints and believers. Of these, the first is already effected, namely, predestination; the second and third, that is, the vocation and justification, have taken place, are taking place, and will take place; but the fourth, namely, the glorifying, is at present in hope; but a thing future in realization.** The sacrament of this thing, namely, of the unity of the body and blood of Christ**, is prepared on the Lord’s table in some places daily, in some places at certain intervals of days, and from the Lord’s table ****it is taken, by some to life, by some to destruction: but the thing itself, of which it is the sacrament, is for every man to life, for no man to destruction, whosoever shall have been a partaker thereof.
On Christan Doctrine Book 3, Chapter 16
newadvent.org/fathers/12023.htm
Even as late as Bernard of Clairvaux, we have him saying:
On Loving God.
ccel.org/ccel/bernard/loving_god.vi.html#vi-p1.6
Bernard of Clairvaux no where denies real presence. Just we say in the Mass, we invoke the words of St. Paul:
“For as often as you eat of this bread and drink this cup, we proclaim your death O Lord, until You come in Glory.”
When Bernard wrote:
Whoso eateth My flesh and drinketh My blood hath eternal life’ (John 6.54). That signifies, whoso honors My death and after My example mortifies his members which are upon the earth (Col. 3.5) shall have eternal life
We also honor his death. This in no way contradicts the Real Presence.