R
RebeccaJ
Guest
Didn’t you just recommend that this thread be ignored?
I wanted the last word…Didn’t you just recommend that this thread be ignored?
How does one know that one is truly feeling the Spirit?It would also be interesting to read the Book of Mormon without bias or prejudice. By doing this, one could read the nature of the book in regards to religious philosophy and ideas.
We need to remember that if the book was written by a man or a group of men, then it would be beneficial to read just what these men were understanding about the nature of god and his message. I think that the book would be fascinating from that perspective.
Also, the claim that is found in the book about praying about its truthfulness is quite unique. The author(s) certainly took a risk in including such sentences as found in Moroni 10 4-6 of the book of mormon. To assume that people would feel something through prayer was quite a risk and a leap. It could have backfired if no one felt the spirit.
I thought it was an opportunity for Mormons to give examples of how the details of the Book of Mormon match science and history. Like Christians can with the New Testament.It seems to me that the original poster was just a troll looking to fan the antimormon fire. The thread would best be ignored or the original poster will get their way.
If it is, then you have to throw everything that pretends to be scripture out. You have to throw the whole idea of God out.Can many people not say the same about Muslims? Does that mean that they might be right?
If it is about being moved internally, why can I not hold the Lord of the Rings as inspired?
I am moved when I watch the Notebook, is it from God?
The whole methodology strikes me as the power of suggestion
Really? In my faith system, there is only one “leap” required. Once I accept that there is a God and only One God as described in the OT, everything else is logical.If it is, then you have to throw everything that pretends to be scripture out. You have to throw the whole idea of God out.
Of course, if you are an atheist that’s not a problem. However, if you have religious faith at any level, it is.
It very much is.
the BoM itself defines it as HAVING to be in the american hemisphere. at the very least that will do.An atheist would laugh himself silly at you.
By the way, who decided what the “required areas” are?
Okay, so I’ll give you that Jesus was born in the ‘land of Jerusalem,’ is there any evidence that it was ever called that? What about when Augustus Caersar had a census for the first time, was it called the ‘land of Jerusalem’ then?
I prayed with a sincere heart, with real intent, and with faith in Christ to know whether the Book of Mormon was true. I did this throughout my four years of seminary, during my two year mission, and after my temple marriage. Not once did I ever receive any kind of recognizable witness, either confirming or disconfirming. I experienced absolutely nothing at all when I prayed, despite my desperate need for a witness. This was extremely disconcerting and troubling. Once I began to make my failure in acquiring a testimony known, the accusations began to fly (from parents, relatives, bishops, former mission companions, ward members): you weren’t sincere, you weren’t listening, you must have an unrepented sin, you lacked faith, you must not want to live up to the Church’s standards. Imagine the impact this had on a fifth generation Mormon raised in Utah. I became an atheist for the next 14 years.There is no substitute–NONE–for two things. First, read the Book of Mormon. Second, pray to know if it is true, and accept Moroni’s challenge and ask with a sincere heart, and real intent, with faith in Christ. You, like me, can feel that (to some) infamous burning in the bosom that gives faith and certainty as to the truth of the Book of Mormon.
I do sometimes wonder what kind of evidence we would expect to have. It is very unlikely we will ever have any real evidence that Christ visited the New World after his resurrection. I suspect for the normal Mormon it’s a hope that turns into a strong belief and then to “knowledge” after a certain time. Perhaps Jacob 4:14 in the Book of Mormon can be applied to Mormons:So I was perusing a mormon wesite claiming the manifestations of Christ to the native people of America are actually real, when dealing with the question of whether this is true or not they simply answer by saying that you need to pray to the holy spirit and you’ll get a ‘fuzzy warm’ feeling inside. So, my question is this, is there any real evidence? Were there Christians in the new world when the Europeans came that had not been properly catechised by any human being? Please, show proof that the book is legit.
I think the gospel as found in the Catholic Church is pretty plain. We don’t have answers to everything – there are mysteries. Many Mormons I know frown on accepting the answer “it’s a mystery.” Perhaps many of them want to go “beyond the mark.” Others simply have been brought up in Mormonism and it’s their culture – a culture which seems to work very well for them. That’s the best evidence they have the Book of Mormon is true. They live the Mormon gospel and it works for them.But behold, the Jews were a stiffnecked people; and they despised the words of plainness, and killed the prophets, and sought for things that they could not understand. Wherefore, because of their blindness, which blindness came by looking beyond the mark, they must needs fall; for God hath taken away his plainness from them, and delivered unto them many things which they cannot understand, because they desired it. And because they desired it God hath done it, that they may stumble.
Of course you do.Really? In my faith system, there is only one “leap” required. Once I accept that there is a God and only One God as described in the OT, everything else is logical.
Now, at some point, I must trust in God and that is more than Logic, but I do not have to rely on emotion or feelings.
Exodus might have an answer:Of course you do.
…How do you know "that there is a God and only One God as described in the OT? "
What empirical proof do you have of that? WHY do you believe it?
Exodus 20:2-3
Oh, and here, too:"I, the LORD, am your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, that place of slavery. **You shall not have other gods **besides me.
Exodus 20:23
One doesn’t have to search far for the evidence.“Do not make anything to rank with me; neither gods of silver nor gods of gold shall you make for yourselves.”
Since converting to Catholicism I do find the worship much richer than what I had in Mormonism. I traded bread and water for the body and blood of Christ. I’m happy I’m Catholic, but I do miss the community which Mormonism offered.I respect your views on the culture and I agree with you we Catholics firmly believe it’s not just me and Jesus but us and Jesus but when you enter mass you get a cold shoulder and I think we as Catholics need to work on that, but I don’t think Christ would base salvation on “special knowledge.” For it is written: “Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.”
Nice quotes.Exodus might have an answer:
Oh, and here, too:
One doesn’t have to search far for the evidence.![]()
The trouble with looking for a witness is that it may never come. It happens at times and maybe more than it should. But I am not sure what kind of witness people are searching for? I had a witness of the book of mormon when I was 18. I prayed about it and received a witness. It was quite a strong feeling, not a ‘warm fuzzy’. It was powerful. But for others the witness comes unawares…it is more gentle and invisible. I have seen people come to mormonism because they received a ‘witness’ of its goodness. They saw their lives improved by living the gospel. And that was their witness.I prayed with a sincere heart, with real intent, and with faith in Christ to know whether the Book of Mormon was true. I did this throughout my four years of seminary, during my two year mission, and after my temple marriage. Not once did I ever receive any kind of recognizable witness, either confirming or disconfirming. I experienced absolutely nothing at all when I prayed, despite my desperate need for a witness. This was extremely disconcerting and troubling. NS