S
I would agree with you on the “slip of the tongue” theory were it not for her demonstrated willingness to present “alternative facts” as truth.Of course, if a democrat had a slip of the tongue, it would be overlooked by MSM and posters at CAF.
They have been in office less than a month. She is aware of the error she made and I am sure she will try not to do it again. If 6 months from now she is reporting incorrect information, then we need to worry.
Mind boggling. She lied. She made up an idea that is a complete fabricatio in order to justify a policy. Normally we expect some professionalism, We expect policies ot be informed by evidence. Normally, if policy is made by gut fee and justified by invented stories we object.Of course, if a democrat had a slip of the tongue, it would be overlooked by MSM and posters at CAF.
They have been in office less than a month. She is aware of the error she made and I am sure she will try not to do it again. If 6 months from now she is reporting incorrect information, then we need to worry.
What was the lie?Mind boggling. She lied. She made up an idea that is a complete fabricatio in order to justify a policy. Normally we expect some professionalism, We expect policies ot be informed by evidence. Normally, if policy is made by gut fee and justified by invented stories we object.
But some posters at CAF brush off lying. And hatch the novel idea that lies derive form inexperience.![]()
Most CAF posters seem to be fairly conservative from what I’ve seen. Personally, if a Democrat had made the same mistake, I would at the very least consider it extremely unprofessional. The problem with Conway is that she appears to be deliberately manipulative, as opposed to just choosing the wrong words.Of course, if a democrat had a slip of the tongue, it would be overlooked by MSM and posters at CAF.
Kelleyanne Conway said she meant to say “bowling green terorists”: twitter.com/KellyannePolls/status/827505588808667136Of course, if a democrat had a slip of the tongue, it would be overlooked by MSM and posters at CAF.
They have been in office less than a month. She is aware of the error she made and I am sure she will try not to do it again. If 6 months from now she is reporting incorrect information, then we need to worry.
abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-kentucky-us-dozens-terrorists-country-refugees/story?id=20931131The discovery in 2009 of two al Qaeda-Iraq terrorists living as refugees in Bowling Green, Kentucky – who later admitted in court that they’d attacked U.S. soldiers in Iraq – prompted the bureau to assign hundreds of specialists to an around-the-clock effort aimed at checking its archive of 100,000 improvised explosive devices collected in the war zones, known as IEDs, for other suspected terrorists’ fingerprints.
That there was a massacre, as opposed to a mere transfer of money and arms (still terrible, don’t get me wrong).What was the lie?
Thank you for posting this. (I am computer illiterate and don’t know how to post linksKelleyanne Conway said she meant to say “bowling green terorists”: twitter.com/KellyannePolls/status/827505588808667136
She was referring to this story:
abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-kentucky-us-dozens-terrorists-country-refugees/story?id=20931131
A serious character flaw?LOL.
His “Mistress of Propaganda” – as someone recently called her (who was it, again?)
There are a lot of “alternative facts” they are both due to recant. I’ve never heard him recant anything in his entire life, tho.
Calling Conway his “mistress of propaganda” is beyond the pale. I guess the woman card only works if the woman is a liberal. A republican woman, as soon as she shows any misstep, is going to be defiled beyond recognition.LOL.
His “Mistress of Propaganda” – as someone recently called her (who was it, again?)
There are a lot of “alternative facts” they are both due to recant. I’ve never heard him recant anything in his entire life, tho.
.
You’re right: perhaps we should all aspire to be like Conway’s boss, who demonstrates reverence for women by - do I have this right? - “grabbing 'em by the p***y.”Well done! I truly see how your side respects the female gender.
You know what, keep repeating that line and relish the idea of destroying Trump by saying it, and pretty soon and probably already you’re committing the same sins in your head.You’re right: perhaps we should all aspire to be like Conway’s boss, who demonstrates reverence for women by - do I have this right? - “grabbing 'em by the p***y.”
I’m confused. Should Kelly Conway use or not use the gender card?Calling Conway his “mistress of propaganda” is beyond the pale. I guess the woman card only works if the woman is a liberal. A republican woman, as soon as she shows any misstep, is going to be defiled beyond recognition.
Well done! I truly see how your side respects the female gender.
It’s a feminized version of “Master of Propaganda”. Not that she’s his lover.Calling Conway his “mistress of propaganda” is beyond the pale. I guess the woman card only works if the woman is a liberal. A republican woman, as soon as she shows any misstep, is going to be defiled beyond recognition.
Well done! I truly see how your side respects the female gender.
That there was a Bowling Green Massacre.What was the lie?