R
rayne89
Guest
If the family repents the excommunication can be lifted by the way.
It was a reality check to view all the reader responses at the news agency website. Many were Catholic and referenced the Church is very negative ways. These Catholics that claim to be strong Catholics evidently aren’t very strong at all. This is as sobering as running front row in a battle and turning back to see I’m mostly alone against a very angry mob on both sides.I am surprised that strong Catholics don’t understand the church’s actions here. The church does not allow for abortion for any reason, at all, ever.
Forgiveness - the big thingIf the family repents the excommunication can be lifted by the way.
I think it is because the issue became public and in the news, so he had to respond so the faithful in Brazil don’t get the impression that it is okay to do that.Well, the Doctors would have been excommunicated either way, regardless of it being a public excummunication or not. I think the real question here is, why did the Bishop make it a public excommunication instead of simply recognizing it as an automatic one? What’s the situation that different in Brazil as compared to North America?
In recent years we’ve all been made aware that the Church has a long history of protecting child-rapists. Given the Church’s attitude toward child abuse, particularily the sexual abuse of girls, it is hardly surprising that the step-father has not been excommunicated .… as far as I know, the Church has not issued a statement on the father’s crimes. I doubt it’s intentional, but it sends the message that child rapists are A-OK.
When the pregnancy got to a point where it was too much physically for the 9 year old, they could have performed a cesarean section and then done all possible to save the lives of the twins. They did not have to tear the babies apart.I am pro-life too, but I can’t see how a nine year old child would survive the pregnancy of twins, and I don’t think the Brazilian Catholic Church should have spoken out like this as it kind of makes us look like a Church that would risk the death of a child and I can’t see how she would have been physically able to carry twins to full term, thus I don’t believe the babies would have survived anyway.
Unless someone can show me proof that this child would have been able to carry those twins to a viable age, I see this as a case of saving the life of an innocent child, as I can’t see how the twins would have survived anyway. The nine year old is a child too, just as the aborted babies were.
I’ve got a ten year old girl, and I can’t see how her small body would have been able to carry two babies to a viable age, let alone a nine year old.
those babies were not holding a gun on the mother. Abortion is never self defense.Why isn’t the child raping piece of garbage stepfather also being excommunicated? Why doesn’t the Church view him as sharing in the responsibility of the abortion? He’s the one that created the babies!
I think that the enragement is not so much that the mother/doctors are being excommunicated but that the father is not, and that as far as I know, the Church has not issued a statement on the father’s crimes. I doubt it’s intentional, but it sends the message that child rapists are A-OK.
Is performing an abortion on a 9 year old worse than raping your stepdaughter from the ages of 6 to 9 and only stopping because you were found out when she becomes pregnant? Logically, yes, because the abortion took away the chance at life for these babies, the chance to grow up and live life and serve God and be raped themselves, etc, etc…but isn’t raping kids against God’s law too? The Bishop says they must be excommunicated for breaking God’s law, which is above man’s law. So why isn’t the Bishop publically excommunicating all others who break God’s law - starting with this pigscum rapist?
I’m against abortion. I believe life begins at conception. I believe abortion is always killing, always the taking of a human life. But it is not always 1st degree murder. Sometimes it is self-defense.
And are you speaking of the mother of the 9 year old who was blind for three years while her husband was sexually abusing her daughter?The excommunication is absolutely ridiculous. This nine year old child cannot carry a twin pregnancy or probably any pregnancy to term and would likely die as a result or be severely physically damaged. Her doctors have also stated this. These twins should not have been sent to grow in her womb by this rapist. The nine year old’s life matters just as much as the pregnancy. If this happened to my daughter I would do exactly the same thing. I am pro life which includes not letting my daughter be physically destroyed.
Where in the Truth do you claim to get your information?In recent years we’ve all been made aware that the Church has a long history of protecting child-rapists. Given the Church’s attitude toward child abuse, particularily the sexual abuse of girls, it is hardly surprising that the step-father has not been excommunicated .
It is hardly surprising because there are only certain offenses that call for excommunication. Abortion, using violent force against the pope, desecration of the Eucharist, a priest who absolves a partner in adultery, consecrating a bishop without a pontifical mandate, directly violating the seal of confession and formal apostasy, heresy or schism. Those are reasons in Canon law for excommunication.In recent years we’ve all been made aware that the Church has a long history of protecting child-rapists. Given the Church’s attitude toward child abuse, particularily the sexual abuse of girls, it is hardly surprising that the step-father has not been excommunicated .
There is absolutely nothing ridiculous about dogmas that protect the sanctity of life from conception to its natural ending.I condemn the Brazilian Church and Vatican for backing the Brazilian church. One day Lord himself will come and ask these folks to use a bit of common sense, show a bit of compassion and burn those ridiculous dogmas.
In Christ’s human life, there were always a few who made up for theIt was a reality check to view all the reader responses at the news agency website. Many were Catholic and referenced the Church is very negative ways. These Catholics that claim to be strong Catholics evidently aren’t very strong at all. This is as sobering as running front row in a battle and turning back to see I’m mostly alone against a very angry mob on both sides.
Nope. He will call those doctors to task for tearing apart two innocent twins. How about compassion for those two lives? No one seems to speak on their behalf.I condemn the Brazilian Church and Vatican for backing the Brazilian church. One day Lord himself will come and ask these folks to use a bit of common sense, show a bit of compassion and burn those ridiculous dogmas.


I see it ridiculous.The clergy is a safe haven for Child Molesters and now they finds it should be OK for a 9 year old girl to give birth.There is absolutely nothing ridiculous about dogmas that protect the sanctity of life from conception to its natural ending.
There is nothing Catholic about condemning either the Curia (the Vatican, as any Catholic knows, is a city, not an organization) or the Archbishop for defending life.
Condemnations like this do nothing to the Church, but can be most corrosive to the condemner.
Blessings,
Gerry
Please explain: how does having an abortion un-rape this girl?but in cases of extreme cases like this, there has be some tolerance for the family here. We are talking about excommunicating THE FAMILY who wants to save their daughter’s 9-YEAR OLD LIFE who was horribly raped by a monster stepfather.