N
Neil_Anthony
Guest
Should we go back to the pre-Vatican II era when it was much harder to get an annulment?
it still is. I speak from experience, it is not a stroll in the park and it is never guaranteedShould we go back to the pre-Vatican II era when it was much harder to get an annulment?
I agree. There have always been abuses, of course, before and after Vatican II.it still is. I speak from experience, it is not a stroll in the park and it is never guaranteed
AMEN.It should be easier today, because so few people getting ‘married’ actually intend to get married in the Catholic sense of the word.
And you think that’s going to change by making the Church be more liberal in its recognition of annulment? Yes, it should be harder to get a Catholic wedding, but it should be equally as hard to get the Church to recognize annulment, so that people take the sacrament of marriage seriously.It should be easier today, because so few people getting ‘married’ actually intend to get married in the Catholic sense of the word.
If the couple (or one of them) getting married don’t truly intend to marry, then their ‘marriage’ isn’t valid. They have lied to God and the church and taken false vows. That means that they weren’t married in the eyes of God or the Church.And you think that’s going to change by making the Church be more liberal in its recognition of annulment? Yes, it should be harder to get a Catholic wedding, but it should be equally as hard to get the Church to recognize annulment, so that people take the sacrament of marriage seriously.
An annulment is not wrong - divorce and living an unchaste life is wrong. If a marriage is not valid it’s not valid - period. There is nothing wrong with that. What is wrong is that the couple obviously had issues at the time of their marriage that were not either resolved or that they had a wedding at all. Poor preparation for marriage is what’s wrong.I agree with NOBEERINHEAVEN—From what I hear it is pretty much filing the paperwork—going through the motions—and getting signed off. What a horrible feeling for people that are fighting for their marriage and really know that an anullment is wrong.
Prayers.
Please, this is not intended to be personal, but I’m guessing you have never been through the nullity process. It was scandalously EASY for my ex and I to get married in the Church, with no helpful or searching preparation to speak of…just one 30 minute meeting with our pastor during which we discussed details of the Nuptial Mass, and a terrible Engaged Encounter weekend retreat.And you think that’s going to change by making the Church be more liberal in its recognition of annulment? Yes, it should be harder to get a Catholic wedding, but it should be equally as hard to get the Church to recognize annulment, so that people take the sacrament of marriage seriously.
It should be easier today, because so few people getting ‘married’ actually intend to get married in the Catholic sense of the word./QUOTE
I like how you load the question, so its just another thing you can blame Vat2 for. Why isnt the pope’s authority above reproach when it comes to V2?
why cant their be a poll on canon law issues?no 1 we don’t do a poll on canon law issues
no 2 the annulment process and the canon law tribunal in general is there to give Catholics recourse under canon law when they need it, and must be made available to all who need it
no 3, question attacks the wrong side of the issue
if poster feels there are too many annulments, it means there are too many invalid marriages, so a more logical approach would be exploring ways to make sure Catholics are prepared to marry validly and taught the conditions for valid marriage, and to intend what the Church intends for marriage.
no 4, how is this a traditional Catholic forum issue and not a liturgy and sacraments post?
Don’t believe everything you hear.I agree with NOBEERINHEAVEN—From what I hear it is pretty much filing the paperwork—going through the motions—and getting signed off. What a horrible feeling for people that are fighting for their marriage and really know that an anullment is wrong.
Prayers.
Absolutely agree. We went through the tests, meetings with priest, 2 weekends of pre-cana (and they were both good) and the first years of marriage were still hard in some ways.So who exactly has decided that it’s too “easy” to get an annulment these days? And do people realize that in many places/cases, it’s already MUCH more difficult to “get” an annulment than it is to get married?
In my parents’ day, the Church required 6 months of intenstive Pre Cana. That’s what I think we need.
I fully accept V2 and I prefer the Novus Ordo mass. I was just interested in whether Traditional catholics who prefer the old liturgy also prefer the old way of dealing with marriages. Didn’t mean to offend.Neil_Anthony;2914709:
I like how you load the question, so its just another thing you can blame Vat2 for. Why isnt the pope’s authority above reproach when it comes to V2?It should be easier today, because so few people getting ‘married’ actually intend to get married in the Catholic sense of the word.