B
I agree. This law is no different than hate crime legislation. I’m sorry, if you beat up a person or kill them, it’s a hate crime! It doesn’t matter why you beat someone up, you probably hated them!Why should there be bullying for any reason, especially in a Catholic school? I believe we should resist having them shut down but bullying is anti Christian and should be addressed.
I agreed until I read the article. They’re not talking just about the issue of bullying. Here’s a quote:Why should there be bullying for any reason, especially in a Catholic school? I believe we should resist having them shut down but bullying is anti Christian and should be addressed.
In a committee hearing, Jim Knight, Minister of State for Schools accused the Catholic Church of “faith-based bullying”.
What in the samhill is faithbased bullying? Bullies should be dsiciplined no matter who they are bullying. We shoot ourselves in the foot if we allow it in some cases but not in others.I agreed until I read the article. They’re not talking just about the issue of bullying. Here’s a quote:
Faith based bullying is the declaration that heterosexual marriage is inherently superior to homosexual ‘marriage.’ In other words, the Catholic Churches faith is inherently ‘homophobic’ and will bring distress to children of gay parents. It’s beginning to be called ‘hetrosexualism’ and anyone who holds that heterosexual relationships are normative and homosexual relations are in anyway abnormal are bigots. Thus that Catholic Church is engaging in faith based ‘bullying’ by the mere act of being Catholic – which is why they want the schools closed down and handed to the State. Yup, that’s 100% Soviet.What in the samhill is faithbased bullying? Bullies should be dsiciplined no matter who they are bullying. We shoot ourselves in the foot if we allow it in some cases but not in others.
BOURNEMOUTH, UK, May 31, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Britain’s heavily
left-leaning University and College Union (UCU) that represents teachers
and professors at the post-secondary level, says the recently passed
Sexual Orientation Regulations (SOR’s) do not go far enough. The union is
calling for British law to be rewritten to prohibit teachers or schools
from expressing any moral opposition to homosexuality or from promoting
natural marriage in the classroom.
At their annual conference in Bournemouth, members voted unanimously on a
motion demanding that laws be changed to prohibit teachers from voicing
opposition to homosexuality or the “gay” lifestyle. Members argued that
the passage of the Sexual Orientation Regulations meant that “faith
schools” ought to be forced to entirely cease teaching religious doctrines
on sexual morality.
The union called for an end to “bigoted” attitudes among teachers,
insisting that they be prohibited from promoting natural marriage as a
positive social value. Homosexuality, they said, must be given equal
status as natural sexuality.
I think you’ll find everyone agrees with you in principle.There should not be discrimination based on sexual orientation. We are all equal in God’s eyes. As long as they are not acting on it they have every right to be treated the same.
…because tolerating the fact that people have differences of opinion on the morality of certain acts would be, you know, tolerant. Stonewall can’t be tolerant of those intolerant people who disagree with them. No people who don’t agree with them are bigots and bullies. They are asking their own government to strip the religious rights of some citizens to free themselves from the occasional offence of knowing there are people who disagree with them. How short sighted and odd.There should not be discrimination based on sexual orientation. We are all equal in God’s eyes. As long as they are not acting on it they have every right to be treated the same.