Bruce Jenner's Début as "Caitlyn"

  • Thread starter Thread starter DakiniArtist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If it is true that the brain of a transgender person is physically different from that of a heterosexual or a homosexual person, why should it be decided that it is the sex organs and other more easily apparent traits that should determine gender and whether someone is a man or a woman rather than an internal but nonetheless very real physical trait in the brain?
Well, the short answer is it’s not yet certain whether that’s true. However, it would not be astonishing to learn that there is something going on with or in the brain relative to a specific behavior trait. But even that would not necessarily mean it is causal (the reason for the behavior).
 
So, what is going on with Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner? I would have to say we just don’t know.
Ok. But what do the doctors who are facilitating Jenner’s decision for surgical alteration claim to know? To what science do they appeal to “know” he is truly a woman? People who support his decision argue that he has spent a lot of time with medical professionals. So, if doctors have some scientific Rosetta Stone to explain it all, what is that data? What do they offer to distinguish themselves any different than ancient man who bore holes in their heads to let the demons out? What do they have beyond Jenner’s insistence? Is their means of psychological analysis also sufficient to determine if someone is the reincarnation of person X they claim to be? Are their brain inconsistencies native only to women? If so, on what basis would they appeal to that phenomenon over any other biological evidence pointing to maleness? Etc…

In the face of the media propaganda and apparent forthcoming reality TV show, I think it would be helpful if inquiring citizens were given a respectful discourse on the specifics of this medical condition, if, as Jenner says, his goal is to help others with this condition.
 
Ok. But what do the doctors who are facilitating Jenner’s decision for surgical alteration claim to know? To what science do they appeal to “know” he is truly a woman? People who support his decision argue that he has spent a lot of time with medical professionals. So, if doctors have some scientific Rosetta Stone to explain it all, what is that data? What do they offer to distinguish themselves any different than ancient man who bore holes in their heads to let the demons out? What do they have beyond Jenner’s insistence? Is their means of psychological analysis also sufficient to determine if someone is the reincarnation of person X they claim to be? Are their brain inconsistencies native only to women? If so, on what basis would they appeal to that phenomenon over any other biological evidence pointing to maleness? Etc…
Well, once again, I just don’t know. Ah, but as far explaining thoughts of reincarnation goes, I can answer that one. It does seem genetic memory is a possibility. 🙂
 
A couple of my fellow RCIA graduates have posted this to Facebook and are celebrating his “bravery.” I know it wouldn’t help if I said anything about it and I won’t. One also posts a lot of pro-gay marriage things. Makes me wonder why this person joined the Church. I don’t know if it’s my place to say anything and if so, what. I know a couple of times over the years the fellow who runs adult ed has charitably corrected me on some things. I don’t know. 🤷

I love NPR and I swear now everyday their Facebook newsfeed has transgender stories. What happened? Even my husband has noticed.
I was born and raised Catholic. Now in my 50s, I can confidently say, I have never ever met a Catholic who played by all the rules. That includes priests, nuns, our popes, etc. Every one of us is a sinner. And every one of us is sensitive to things because of what we’ve experienced in our lives. If we have a gay son, daughter, brother, sister, etc and we’ve witnessed the discrimination, the pain, the strength, the courage and the love, we will have a very different perspective on things than those who have not.

I too sit in pews with people who support things outside the framework of our faith. For example, people who support capital punishment and who decry the USCCB’s call for our govt to allocate more resources to the poor or global warming. I look at them and say, what church do you belong to? But then I look at myself and ask the same thing. We’re all works in progress.
 
Sure he does. A blind person has no choice in the matter, therefore any resentment felt by that person is based upon one of their senses being taken away for a reason that they can’t comprehend. Jenner had a choice. He had “uncomfortable” feelings in his head that affected neither his senses or his health. He chose to think God made a mistake in creating him a man. Maybe he doesn’t think God is stupid, but he at least thinks God is fallible and if that’s the case, God fails to be God. So, if one thinks that Bruce Jenner is a woman, then one has to believe that God makes mistakes,and therefore is not really God.
Maybe Jenner thinks that Original Sin exists and it had negative ramifications for creation
Yet specifically per the report, “Our data does not show at what age the respondents made suicide attempts and therefore it is difficult to draw conclusions about the risk of suicide over their life spans.” There’s no smoking gun that says SRS increases mortality/morbidity. There’s no smoking gun that it decreases, either. But at best, the data is troubling and inconclusive.
All of the transgender people I know who have had surgery, and I do know a bunch, say that
For reasons none of us - none of us - can understand - some people are born blind. This is something human beings have for thousands of years had the vocabulary to articulate. More recently, we now have a vocabulary allowing people to articulate that they don’t feel attraction towards members of the opposite sex (homosexual feeling is a very different thing from homosexual acts) - and more recently still, allowing people to articulate that the gender they feel - they know - themselves to be - doesn’t match their physical sex.

For reasons none of us can understand, some people are born with their body not matching their brain. One of these people was born physically a man, Bruce Jenner, and has since been able to do something to align the two - becoming Caitlyn.

It has nothing to do with God in a lot of ways - I’ve no idea of Caitlyn’s personal beliefs but I’m not aware she is either angry that this happened to her at all (though it would be pretty understandable frankly), or thinks she is somehow “smarter” than God.

No one has has said that God made a mistake (any more than I think He made a mistake in making me a lesbian for that matter). We just don’t know why this happens - it does. And now we are able to do something about it. God moves, as the hymn goes, in a mysterious way.
Transgender people aren’t new, they have been documented for thousands of years in India.
So if I were born a homicidal maniac, I should just start killing people because my brain says it’s alright. God creates us. God creates us male and female. To decide to physically make ourselves into something other than what God created, no matter what our brains tell us, has to be an affront to God’s will. More than that, it makes ourselves God.
People aren’t born homicidal, some are however born male and others female.
So people with mental disabilities and disorders have a choice?

There are a lot of invisible disorders as well. I live with depression and anxiety; the former appears to be something that runs in the family. These are not my choice either but affect my life in significant ways. I can choose how I deal with them and for me it’s easy because there are effective therapies, including drugs, that help. Transgenderism isn’t really understood and not as easily treated. Transitioning is an option that may save a transgender person’s life. Just knowing it’s a option tomorrow probably keeps some from offing themselves today.
Indubitably.
You have a choice as to how you deal with it. Depression runs rampant in my family as well. The simplest solution to my depression would be to blow my brains out, but I hardly think that God would support that decision. Jenner’s choice would be to seek medicinal or psychological help to let him live with his disorder, or mutilate himself and turn himself into a “woman”. Which choice do you think God is most likely to approve?
Which do you think God is more likely to approve of, suicide or transitioning?
 
Being blind is not the same as being transgender – just as being African-American is not the same thing as same-sex attraction. Being Blind or being African-American are not sinful states, nor are they by choice. Also, not having an attraction to the opposite sex is not a problem, nor is it sinful – it may mean God has given one the grace to live a single & chaste life. You say: “It has nothing to do with God”? Our lives and the way we choose to live have EVERYTHING to do with God.

Modification of one’s body is a SERIOUS SIN. “What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?” (1 Corinthians 6:19). “Except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reason, directly intended amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations performed on innocent persons are against the moral law.” (Catholic Catechism, item 2297). One’s body is not one’s own to be changed at will.
That section is on torture.
Oh please.

Seriously you talk of compassion - consider how crude and mean spirited your whole post is.

Being a bit respectful and polite to someone even if you have a moral objection takes nothing away from you. or is it just that hard to be a decent person? We trans women threaten your right to not be a decent person?

I’m a transsexual woman too. implying I am just a man wearing a dress who cut her penis off is just rude and insulting for no reason at all other then it fulfills your need to feel right and superior and being able to put people who you don’t understand and who have nothing to do with how you live you life down.
God loves you even if troglodytes don’t.
Forgive my bluntness, but, you don’t me menstrate, you can’t have a child, you can’t nurse a child. How in any biologically meaningful way are you a woman?
I am insulted that you believe that womanhood is about breeding.
 
Forgive my bluntness, but, you don’t me menstrate, you can’t have a child, you can’t nurse a child. How in any biologically meaningful way are you a woman?
I wasn’t aware that the essence of my being a woman was that I get to wear tampons sometimes. But, you know, thanks for clearing that up.
Ok. But what do the doctors who are facilitating Jenner’s decision for surgical alteration claim to know? To what science do they appeal to “know” he is truly a woman? People who support his decision argue that he has spent a lot of time with medical professionals. So, if doctors have some scientific Rosetta Stone to explain it all, what is that data? What do they offer to distinguish themselves any different than ancient man who bore holes in their heads to let the demons out? What do they have beyond Jenner’s insistence? Is their means of psychological analysis also sufficient to determine if someone is the reincarnation of person X they claim to be? Are their brain inconsistencies native only to women? If so, on what basis would they appeal to that phenomenon over any other biological evidence pointing to maleness? Etc…

In the face of the media propaganda and apparent forthcoming reality TV show, I think it would be helpful if inquiring citizens were given a respectful discourse on the specifics of this medical condition, if, as Jenner says, his goal is to help others with this condition.
I think you’re right here. I full support Jenner’s right to make her decision (whether I agree with it is neither here nor there), though I’m not enamoured of it forming part of a reality TV show. I also worry that she is not the example to other men and women with her condition, that she aims to be - not everyone has the material resources to make the transition so readily or easily. A less sensationalist (though no less honest, or even more honest) approach would I think be more helpful for more people.
 
Bruce Jenner is nicely on his way to hell. His life is a freak show. Failed marriages and screwed up kids. They disgust me.

As to why we all have sinful inclinations, blame Adam and Eve.

Keep it simple stupid is what I always say, cause it is.
 
I am insulted that you believe that womanhood is about breeding.
How sad that you view the ability to have carry, have, and nurture children with such contempt.
I wasn’t aware that the essence of my being a woman was that I get to wear tampons sometimes. But, you know, thanks for clearing that up.
If being a woman is a biological fact, then yes, the whole menstruating thing is a rather significant difference. If being a woman is just about how you feel, then their are no meaningful differences between men and women and we can get rid of the WNBA, the WPGA, the WTA, and Title IX rules for college sports and let the women compete with men on the same turf.
 
ucfengr;13028577:
I am insulted that you believe that womanhood is about breeding.
How sad that you view the ability to have carry, have, and nurture children with such contempt.
How unconscionably ridiculous that you have entirely narrowed your view of womanhood to their ability to carry and nurture children.
 
How sad that you view the ability to have carry, have, and nurture children with such contempt.
How unconscionably ridiculous that you have entirely narrowed your view of womanhood to their ability to carry and nurture children.
If being a woman is a biological fact, then yes, the whole menstruating thing is a rather significant difference. If being a woman is just about how you feel, then their are no meaningful differences between men and women and we can get rid of the WNBA, the WPGA, the WTA, and Title IX rules for college sports and let the women compete with men on the same turf.
Womanhood and being female are very different things. Femininity is again a 3rd thing. Bruce Jenner was biologically, physically, male. It doesn’t mean he considered himself to be a man. We need to separate a whole load of different things because they are distinct.

Now IMO some sports could be markedly improved by having a mix of male and female players, where it’s reasonable that a mix of skills and attribute could be useful in team sports, or for some individual ones. As you mention the WPGA, golf is a sport where I can’t see any reason for men and women to compete equally (though I’m open to an argument to the contrary).
 
Forgive my bluntness, but, you don’t me menstrate, you can’t have a child, you can’t nurse a child. How in any biologically meaningful way are you a woman?
Do you want me to send a picture?

As for reproduction, I did what many women who cannot conceive do and adopted. I can be a mother 🙂
 
Stating the truth isn’t mean. What’s mean is contributing to peoples delusions.
What truth was being stated?

People here are stating personal opinions on issues they don’t understand and don’t have first hand experience with. But they are experts and know the truth about it? What do they know? What do you really know?

They don’t know me, or my life, but it is alright to say I am a delusional man who had her penis cut off and runs’s around in dresses pretending to be a girl. That is the truth that needs to be stated? They don’t know me, you don’t know me. You do not know what is in my heart, or what the truth really is. God know’s me, but you are not God. So who are you to judge or decide what the truth of all this is?
 
How sad that you view the ability to have carry, have, and nurture children with such contempt.

If being a woman is a biological fact, then yes, the whole menstruating thing is a rather significant difference. If being a woman is just about how you feel, then their are no meaningful differences between men and women and we can get rid of the WNBA, the WPGA, the WTA, and Title IX rules for college sports and let the women compete with men on the same turf.
I don’t treat bearing children with contempt, my issue is that women are always defined in relation to men, but men are not defined in relation to women. Also such line of thinking says that women who died virgins serving God are less than women because they renounced marriage and procreation. It is theologically unacceptable for you to claim that a woman is more a woman if she marries and has children than if she remains a virgin.
 
What truth was being stated?

People here are stating personal opinions on issues they don’t understand and don’t have first hand experience with. But they are experts and know the truth about it? What do they know? What do you really know?

They don’t know me, or my life, but it is alright to say I am a delusional man who had her penis cut off and runs’s around in dresses pretending to be a girl. That is the truth that needs to be stated? They don’t know me, you don’t know me. You do not know what is in my heart, or what the truth really is. God know’s me, but you are not God. So who are you to judge or decide what the truth of all this is?
You’re not a delusional man. You are simply a man. And no amount of surgery, hormones or clothing can undo that. You have the right to live your life the way you want to -what you don’t have is the right to expect everyone else to accept your actions . Probably doesn’t matter to you what my opinion of the way you have chosen to live your life is but then I wonder why you would come and do a Catholic form and try and defend it.?
 
All of the transgender people I know who have had surgery, and I do know a bunch, say that
I’m glad to hear they are experiencing some relief. But we’re still not sure why, or why others didn’t. It’s quite a dice to roll, and while I don’t condemn them for making a decision under such duress, I can’t support it, either.
 
There has been a curious lack of response on the extensive, strong statements many of our Popes have made condemning transgender surgery. They have repeatedly directed Catholics on this subject.
 
Do you want me to send a picture?
Me dressing up as Napoleon doesn’t make me Napoleon. Even if I went so far as to have myself surgically reduced in height, I still wouldn’t be him.
As for reproduction, I did what many women who cannot conceive do and adopted. I can be a mother 🙂
No, you really can’t. Being a woman and/or a mother involves objective biological differences that go beyond a preference for playing with dolls as a child rather than toy guns.
 
I don’t treat bearing children with contempt, my issue is that women are always defined in relation to men, but men are not defined in relation to women. Also such line of thinking says that women who died virgins serving God are less than women because they renounced marriage and procreation. It is theologically unacceptable for you to claim that a woman is more a woman if she marries and has children than if she remains a virgin.
That’s an assumption on you’re part, I’ve never said that women who don’t have children are less than women who did, though it would be easy for me to assume that you think women who did choose motherhood are lesser. In any case, there are objective biological differences between men and women that can’t be changed through cosmetic surgery. Pretending those objective differences are less relevant than subjective feelings is unserious.
 
There has been a curious lack of response on the extensive, strong statements many of our Popes have made condemning transgender surgery. They have repeatedly directed Catholics on this subject.
The response that you will get is that the patients were women all along, or men all along, that they didn’t change genders. However, that requires you to accept the another premise that has yet to be established. It just moves the discussion to another area.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top