Buffalo Bills support Susan Komen - help

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
buffalo:
Please write or phone the Bills expressing your disappointment.
OK, I’ll bite … Why?
 
OK, I’ll bite … Why?
Because the Susan G. Komen Foundation provides funding not just for breast cancer research, but also funds one of the leading causes of breast cancer.

Abortion.

The Foundations gives money to Planned Parenthood and some other abortion providers.
 
Thank God for SUSAN G. KOMEN FOUNDATION! And God will bless the Buffalo Bills for their support!

Don’t read rumors from the media. 99.999% of what you hear in the media is a lie… GET THE FACTS.
 
Thank God for SUSAN G. KOMEN FOUNDATION! And God will bless the Buffalo Bills for their support!

Don’t read rumors from the media. 99.999% of what you hear in the media is a lie… GET THE FACTS.
Thank you for letting us know that you like to murder babies in such a profound and loud manner. Your desire to murder people will be remembered.

I am sure that this post will be deleted based on the grounds that it is somehow uncharitable, but then you also advocate the murder of people. That is totally unacceptable. I might even be banned for calling you on this this, but then it is against forum rules to advocate violence which is exactly what you are doing. I might even be banned, but then, advocating mass murder which is what you are doing here is so beyond Catholic teaching that what you post cannot be considered charitable to begin with.
 
God will not bless the Buffalo Bills football team for promoting the murder oif children, despite what some, who falsely claim to be human, might say.
 
Don’t read rumors from the media. 99.999% of what you hear in the media is a lie… GET THE FACTS.
Sorry, but we know the facts and it is true. The support abortion and abortion is one of the major factors in breast cancer. In fact, a number of months ago, CA Live had a person on talking about this particular subject.

BTW: The MSM ignores the truth about the abortion/breast cancer link.
 
Are there groups that deal with breast cancer research that don’t have ties to abortion?

If someone wanted to give to this kind of research but wanted to avoid part of that donation being funneled into the abortion industry who might they look at?
 
The Susan G Komen foundation is fighting breast cancer. This sounds a like a good thing.

The Buffalo Bills support the Susan G Komen foundation. This sounds like a good thing.

The Susan Komen foundation has given some Planned Parenthood chapters money for breast cancer screening and treatment. This sounds a bit off, given Planned Parenthood’s involvement in abortion, but I haven’t seen how breast cancer screening increases abortion. So this sounds like a good thing.

Abortion increases risk of breast cancer. This sounds like a very bad thing… making three bad things (abortion, breast cancer and increased risk). But it should be noted that the National Cancer Institute, after sifting through studies going back to the 1950s, says there is no link between the two.
cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage
 
The Susan G Komen foundation is fighting breast cancer. This sounds a like a good thing.

The Buffalo Bills support the Susan G Komen foundation. This sounds like a good thing.

The Susan Komen foundation has given some Planned Parenthood chapters money for breast cancer screening and treatment. This sounds a bit off, given Planned Parenthood’s involvement in abortion, but I haven’t seen how breast cancer screening increases abortion. So this sounds like a good thing.

Abortion increases risk of breast cancer. This sounds like a very bad thing… making three bad things (abortion, breast cancer and increased risk. But it should be noted that the National Cancer Institute, after sifting through studies going back to the 1950s, says there is no link between the two.
cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage
Read the facts
 
Thank God for SUSAN G. KOMEN FOUNDATION! And God will bless the Buffalo Bills for their support!

Don’t read rumors from the media. 99.999% of what you hear in the media is a lie… GET THE FACTS.
Here is what the Archdiocese of St. Louis has to say about this organization.

lifeissues.org/AbortionBreastcancer/komen/3_25_07.html
The Respect Life Apostolate of the Archdiocese of St. Louis acknowledges the beneficial work of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, formerly known as the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, in the area of breast cancer detection, prevention, research and treatment. Due to its policy allowing affiliates to offer financial support to abortion providing facilities and its endorsement of embryonic stem cell research, the Respect Life Apostolate neither supports nor encourages participation in activities that benefit Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
This position is based on the following facts:
  1. Public records indicate that Susan G. Komen for the Cure (“Komen”) affiliates in at least 22 states (Missouri is not among them) have provided sizable grants to local Planned Parenthood chapters for breast health care services.1
Code:
* Despite Komen donations for breast health care services, Planned Parenthood (the largest single abortion provider in the country) stated in its 2004-2005 annual report that 9,900 more abortions were performed and 26,000 fewer breast exams were provided in 2004 than in 2003. 2
* Donors cannot control how an organization designates its funds. Therefore, money donated for a specific service, i.e. breast health care, directly frees up funds to support other areas of an organization’s agenda, i.e. contraception services, “safe” sex education and abortion services.
  1. The Komen website dismisses the link between procured abortion and increased risk of breast cancer.3 However, the research of Joel Brind, Ph.D., a professor of Endocrinology and founder of the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, and the work of Dr. Janet Daling,4 a leading cancer epidemiologist and pro-choice advocate, invalidate a dismissal of the link. Daling said, “I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid, and our data is accurate. It’s not a matter of believing, it’s a matter of what is.”5
  1. Komen endorses embryonic stem cell research that requires the destruction of embryonic human life, stating that “embryonic stem cells…have the most potential” for cancer stem cell research.6 The destruction of human life at any stage of development is never morally acceptable. Embryonic stem cell research is also unnecessary since adult stem cell research has a proven record of cures and treatments.
Based on these documented facts, the Respect Life Apostolate (RLA) does not endorse Susan G. Komen for the Cure. The RLA encourages you to contact Susan G. Komen for the Cure (5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 250 ? Dallas, TX 75244) and call for an end to all associations between Komen affiliates and Planned Parenthood, recognition of the link between breast cancer and abortion, and a refusal to support research that leads to the destruction of any human life. Our hope is that the Komen Foundation will focus all funds on research to find causes and cures for breast cancer and refuse to give financial or other support to any abortion provider or organization that promotes the destruction of human life.
 
** Breast Cancer Research Giant Funds Planned Parenthood
** Do you think it odd that the largest private funding source for breast cancer research is giving sizeable grants to entities whose activities actually cause breast cancer? You aren’t the only one, but that’s exactly what is happening.

…
Why is Komen funding one of the root causes of breast cancer? **The answer may lie with its founder**. Nancy Goodman Brinker has strong ties to the Planned Parenthood of Dallas and Northeast Texas affiliate. She currently sits on their Advisory Council and was the 1996 recipient of the Gertrude Shelburne Humanitarian Award. This award was named for the woman who was primarily responsible for founding this local Planned Parenthood organization. It is a sad case of political philosophy taking precedence over the fundamental mission of the Komen Foundation – with tragic results for the women they strive to protect.
 
The Susan G Komen foundation is fighting breast cancer. This sounds a like a good thing.

The Buffalo Bills support the Susan G Komen foundation. This sounds like a good thing.

The Susan Komen foundation has given some Planned Parenthood chapters money for breast cancer screening and treatment. This sounds a bit off, given Planned Parenthood’s involvement in abortion, but I haven’t seen how breast cancer screening increases abortion. So this sounds like a good thing.

Abortion increases risk of breast cancer. This sounds like a very bad thing… making three bad things (abortion, breast cancer and increased risk). But it should be noted that the National Cancer Institute, after sifting through studies going back to the 1950s, says there is no link between the two.
cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage
the CDC also says there isn’t a link between childhood immunizations and autism… just because a .gov says it isn’t so doesn’t mean it isn’t so. too much lobby money involved 🤷
 
I am not sure what facts you have in mind. I saw reference to a 1994 study linking abortion and breast cancer, but that study would have been included in the comprehensive review by the National Cancer Institute.

The article to which you linked also makes a number of statements about Planned Parenthood receiving money from the Susan G Komen foundation. But at no point does it show that these funds are being used for abortion services.

If I am missing something, could you explain it?
 
I am not sure what facts you have in mind. I saw reference to a 1994 study linking abortion and breast cancer, but that study would have been included in the comprehensive review by the National Cancer Institute.

The article to which you linked also makes a number of statements about Planned Parenthood receiving money from the Susan G Komen foundation. But at no point does it show that these funds are being used for abortion services.

If I am missing something, could you explain it?
Medical Groups Recognizing Link

…A list of medical organizations recognizing a link between abortion and
breast cancer is provided below. Telling women their abortions are related
to increased breast cancer risk is clearly not good for cancer fundraising
businesses, the abortion industry and the pharmaceutical industry. Medical
groups whose doctors do not perform abortions or refer women for abortions
will be among the first to recognize that abortion raises a woman’s breast
cancer risk.
 
The Biological Explanation
How does an abortion leave a woman with more cancer-vulnerable cells in her breasts than she had before she became pregnant? We offer two versions of the biological rationale for the abortion-breast cancer link: a Brief Summary and the longer Detailed Explanation.
 
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer
Press Release
Contact: Karen Malec, 847-421-4000
Date: October 3, 2007

**New Study Shows ‘Best Predictor of Breast Cancer’
**

The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons published a study yesterday entitled, “The Breast Cancer Epidemic.” It showed that, among seven risk factors, abortion is the “best predictor of breast cancer,” and fertility is also a useful predictor. [1]
 
The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Here is the study to which your link refers:
jpands.org/vol12no3/carroll.pdf

The study says that since abortion rates and breast cancer rates have both increased, in some European countries, then they must be related.

But correlation doesn’t equal causation. The study is a population level look at something which requires individual cases be studied, i.e. whether a woman has had an abortion or not.
 
Here is the study to which your link refers:
jpands.org/vol12no3/carroll.pdf

The study says that since abortion rates and breast cancer rates have both increased, in some European countries, then they must be related.

But correlation doesn’t equal causation. The study is a population level look at something which requires individual cases be studied, i.e. whether a woman has had an abortion or not.
OK. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top