But its My Body?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ohsnapitslennon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

ohsnapitslennon

Guest
How can I respond, preferably logically, to the very commonly used “But its my Body” from people who support abortions?

Thanks 🙂
 
Agreed with the others. It’s not only your body. The baby’s DNA is different than yours.

The other point that I would use is related to capital punishment. What crime has the baby committed that warrants a death sentence, without a trial to prove its guilt?

Would it be OK to execute a 6 month out of the womb baby for tree same reason? Without a trial?
 
markomalley said:
Would it be OK to execute a 6 month out of the womb baby for tree same reason? Without a trial?
Click to expand...
Actually a trial to execute a 6 month old would be horrible too.

If it’s my body why can’t I sell one of my kidneys to the highest bidder? Isn’t that a privacy issue (HIPPA)? Why does the government get to impose its will and insist that I only give it away?
 
SamH said:
Actually a trial to execute a 6 month old would be horrible too.
Click to expand...
That’s the point. It would be considered horrible by all but Peter Sanger fans. Now imagine carrying out that sentence without a trial.
 
ohsnapitslennon said:
How can I respond, preferably logically, to the very commonly used “But its my Body” from people who support abortions?

Thanks 🙂
Click to expand...
DNA proves that it’s not any part of their body they are talking about “terminating”.
 
When a woman is pregnant, she is blessed to be CO-operating with GOD in producing a “separate” human being - separate from her. Two separate DNA within one body, two separate hearts operating within one body, two separate minds within one body etc etc.

Her body is designed by GOD to support the life of the new human being within her, and at no time has GOD given the woman the “switch” to change her body from life giving to life ending. GOD’s design is a one way design for life.

So, no the baby within a woman IS NOT the woman’s body, it is the separate and distinct body a another human being, who is not the woman/mother of the baby.

The criminal courts recognize this and charge murderers of pregnant women with double homicide’s as two separate and distinct human beings have been murdered.

The supreme court is not supreme and they got it wrong, everyone knows they got it wrong just as they were wrong on the slavery issue, which they eventually corrected and changed, and they will in time correct this terrible stain on the country.
 
Pro-Choice? - Men and women are free to choose, but once chosen there are effects (consequences) that are not about freedom of choice.

If I choose to speed home from work today to save a few minutes (I have that “freedom”, whether lawful or not), I am not free to choose to be free from the accident that will kill me one second before my car is about to crash into the truck.

Men and women exercise their freedom of choice when they choose to engage in sex. That is where choice dwells. That is where the phrase, “But it is my body” is appropriately exclaimed. And because it is my body, I choose to have sex, with all the follow-up implications (pregnancy).

Have we forgotten that pregnancy is the primary purpose of sex, with the emotions and passions and pleasures all being like “side-effects” that assist that purpose? We are “choosing” the means to achieve pregnancy when we engage in sex, whether consciously or passionately. And ending pregnancy in abortion is like saying we are fools who haven’t a clue what reality and truth are about.

Choosing Sex means Choosing to bring a baby to full term and raise a baby to maturity. That is where Choice is not by a fool, but by a Human.

John Martin
 
I would say something like “if it were your body there would be no issue here, it’s the fact you want to remove someone else’s growing, living body from within you”
 
ohsnapitslennon said:
How can I respond, preferably logically, to the very commonly used “But its my Body” from people who support abortions?
Click to expand...
You may respond with a picture, since they probably do not associate the name “fetus” with anything visual. Once they do, something may change in their thought process.

http://preview.turbosquid.com/Previ...fafc4996-17f9-48db-aa88-27be507c97fdLarge.jpg

http://www.solutionsphc.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/12-week-fetal-fetus-B.jpg
 
ohsnapitslennon said:
How can I respond, preferably logically, to the very commonly used “But its my Body” from people who support abortions?

Thanks 🙂
Click to expand...
Is it only her body that is tossed into a bloody heap in a dumpster? Is it only her body that may survive abortion and is then killed by the abortionist, or alternatively raised to adulthood? By this logic, a woman should be able to kill her children at any age, as they all began as part of “her body.” By similar logic, should a man not have the absolute right to abort any of his children, regardless of what the mother says? I mean, 50% of the DNA is his, after all.

As to the “right” to abortion, which other constitutional right is limited only to women? Which other “right” applies only to women between puberty and menopause? Aren’t rights supposed to apply to all of one’s life, and not only a part of it? Since women normally cannot vote before puberty, should they also be denied the vote once menopausal? I would hope that this helps to show the nonsense of the concept of a “right” to abortion.

What kind of “right” is abortion? It sounds more like license than any right I have ever heard of.
 
po18guy said:
By similar logic, should a man not have the absolute right to abort any of his children, regardless of what the mother says? I mean, 50% of the DNA is his, after all.
Click to expand...
And would you believe that last week I read a local newspaper column stating something around those lines? Things are getting so absurd nowadays, I just don’t know where to :banghead:
 
po18guy said:
Is it only her body that is tossed into a bloody heap in a dumpster? Is it only her body that may survive abortion and is then killed by the abortionist, or alternatively raised to adulthood? By this logic, a woman should be able to kill her children at any age, as they all began as part of “her body.” By similar logic, should a man not have the absolute right to abort any of his children, regardless of what the mother says? I mean, 50% of the DNA is his, after all.

As to the “right” to abortion, which other constitutional right is limited only to women? Which other “right” applies only to women between puberty and menopause? Aren’t rights supposed to apply to all of one’s life, and not only a part of it? Since women normally cannot vote before puberty, should they also be denied the vote once menopausal? I would hope that this helps to show the nonsense of the concept of a “right” to abortion.

What kind of “right” is abortion? It sounds more like license than any right I have ever heard of.
Click to expand...
Wow - that’s the best argument against abortion I have ever read or heard. Thank You.
 
We live in a twisted society. If a woman wanted to cut off the end of her own pinky finger, and was caught trying to do that, she would be thrown in the psychiatric ward, but if she wants to kill her baby that’s legal and “normal” based simply on the location of the baby when she has it killed.

A baby is NOT “the woman’s body”.
 
The true author of abortion is Satan, and he has deceived the people and the lawmakers. Nothing else explains how people can be so deluded.
 
Deus_tecum said:
Nothing else explains how people can be so deluded.
Click to expand...
I am not sure that is fair. I am not pro-abortion, but there are so many complex reasons and issues that CAN be going on; really only God knows the heart of the woman.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top