N
NotWorthy
Guest
Yeah, I’m still hangin’ in there. Keep up the good work, CM?
Probably basking in the glory of winning the 1 millionth post contest, and wondering just what to buy with your winnings I’ll bet!!!Yeah, I’m still hangin’ in there. Keep up the good work, CM?
I am!!! I am!!!:extrahappy:Probably basking in the glory of winning the 1 millionth post contest, and wondering just what to buy with your winnings I’ll bet!!!
O.K. I’ve finally found my glasses:nerd:[1] As he passed by, he saw a man blind from his birth.
[2] And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
[3] Jesus answered, "It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be made manifest in him
This passage always calls to mind people I have known over the years who have been told by others that their sufferings (or especially those of their children) are always the result of sin in their lives.
While this can be true, in light of passages like Exodus 20:1-4, and 2nd Samuel 12:1-24, obviously, according to the very words of Our Lord in this passage, to allege so without a direct proclamation from God is erroneous.
It is my own belief that our most holy faith offers the best (and most scriptural!) concept of dealing with human suffering of any religion.
Our Lord’s compassion for this particular man and His teaching concerning his affliction just reinforce this all the more.
Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum.
Jumping way ahead here, in 39, Jesus said “and that those who see may become blind”.[39] Jesus said, “For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind.”
[40] Some of the Pharisees near him heard this, and they said to him, “Are we also blind?”
[41] Jesus said to them, "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, `We see,’ your guilt remains.
I’ve been watching that juggler for 5 minutes, and he hasn’t even dropped one ball!!!:juggle:
And with just one finger on the mouse:thumbsup:I’ve been watching that juggler for 5 minutes, and he hasn’t even dropped one ball!!!
Man, I’m impressed!!!
I’m still here, but can’t think of anything intelligent to post! We need our leaderHellllllooooo, churchy where are you…
Well, in almost all of this portion of the John’s Gospel, Jesus is showing that He is the fulfillment of all the Jewish Holidays. John is showing how all these holidays pointed toward Him.Looking at the last five chapters, one could get the impression that Jesus only healed on the Sabbath. Any thoughts why both the healings are on the Sabbath, no non-Sabbath healings (miracles, but no healings)?
Pentacost was also originally a Jewish holiday which took a new meaning when it was fulfilled after Christ’s Resurrection and Ascension.Well, in almost all of this portion of the John’s Gospel, Jesus is showing that He is the fulfillment of all the Jewish Holidays. John is showing how all these holidays pointed toward Him.
He does a lot of things around the Passover as well. The water to wine during the first one. The creation of the loaves of bread on the second Passover. Does that remind you of anything? Yes, this shows that Jesus will e the fulfillment of the Passover. And then, of course, the Passion on the third.
Then he does his healings on the Sabbath, which creates so many conflicts with the Pharisees. But it shows that Sunday, the day of His Resurrection, will be the day that we all of us can be healed.
The “Let those who thirst come to me” and “I am the Light of the World” show that Jesus is the fulfillment of the Festival of Lights.
Well, yeah, but I don’t recall any references to it in John’s Gospel.Pentacost was also originally a Jewish holiday which took a new meaning when it was fulfilled after Christ’s Resurrection and Ascension.
I’m still here, but can’t think of anything intelligent to post! We need our leader![]()
[SIGN]Oh SNAP![/SIGN]CM, don’t make me whoop out the “Message” Bible and start posting the next chapters!!! :bigyikes:
I said, you are gods'? [35] If he called them gods to whom the word of God came (and scripture cannot be broken), [36] do you say of him whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world, You are blaspheming,’ because I said, `I am the Son of God’?I don’t know about anyone else, but this really describes me when it comes to so many of the folks that come around me with non-Catholic ideas that they say are in the Bible. Door to door “witnesses” and such especially.[1] “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter the sheepfold by the door but climbs in by another way, that man is a thief and a robber;
[2] but he who enters by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.
[3] To him the gatekeeper opens; the sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.
[4] When he has brought out all his own, he goes before them, and the sheep follow him, for they know his voice.
[5] A stranger they will not follow, but they will flee from him, for they do not know the voice of strangers.”