D
dmelosi
Guest
I asked if you knew any specifically.
No health insurance and no health care are 2 different things.
I asked if you knew any specifically.
I have noticed that plenty of people here have buttressed their opinions with accurate empirical data and you have not. No offense but you have listened to some liberal opinions about socal issues in the U.S. but have no empirical data to support anything you say. To not know about the amount of Medicaid fraud is one example among many.So your 70% figure was probably hyperbole or rhetoric. I doubted you were able to actually support that assertion, but you probably do not remember where you heard that information from. So where is your evidence that Medicaid fraud wastes 25% of its budget?
It can be, but in practice it is the same. Lack of insurance leads to delayed care which results in worse morbidity and higher mortality.No health insurance and no health care are 2 different things.
I think the post was aimed at me, as I was the one who was talking about New Orleans after Katrina. but I think the poster did not understand what I was saying, so the argument was aimed at me, but unfounded. The person thought I believed that the government was responsible for taking care of each individual person’s needs. I must have said something which gave that impression. It was not intended. I simply meant that the love given and shown by individual people and charitable organizations were the only source of good in New Orleans after Katrina…with the exception of the presence of the National Guard. And I was screaming at the Mayor of New Orleans for telling people that New Orleans was ready for them to come home when there weren’t hospitals, adaquate housing…meaning that there wasn’t enough housing to be found whether you could pay for it or not…there weren’t school facilities available…much less enough teachers, many places were totally unsafe after dusk, because the city had no electricity (which meant that people couldn’t come home to work on thier destroyed property).Was this post for me?
No you originally claimed the 70% figure. Yes there is Medicaid fraud, but the main weakness in that Heritage Foundation article is that it did not say what was the total budget of those programs. Could you use the Heritage Foundation’s information to support your original claim of 70%?I have noticed that plenty of people here have buttressed their opinions with accurate empirical data and you have not. No offense but you have listened to some liberal opinions about socal issues in the U.S. but have no empirical data to support anything you say. To not know about the amount of Medicaid fraud is one example among many.
Listen, this type of discourse is not where it’s at. I suggest you spend more time with your faith instead of engaging in left wing polemics. For me, I am going to disengage from this topic and get back to theology.
John
Ribozyme, what he is saying is that his friends son in law is a bum. Definition of a bum is someone who refuses to get a job if it isn’t a high paying with ego trip job. He refuses to lower himself into getting lawful employment that will at the very least help support the family that he procreated. Instead, if he can’t have it all immediately, he will sit on his duff all day and contribute nothing.Gee… you seem to take delectation when “inferior” people do menial tasks for the “superior” people who are economically well off.
Jack Atlus is correct: Poverty is nothing but humiliation.
I suppose one can give them a sense of pride when they are employed. I do not think being a servant for wealthier people will be conducive to that.Ribozyme, what he is saying is that his friends son in law is a bum. Definition of a bum is someone who refuses to get a job if it isn’t a high paying with ego trip job. He refuses to lower himself into getting lawful employment that will at the very least help support the family that he procreated. Instead, if he can’t have it all immediately, he will sit on his duff all day and contribute nothing.
Many men and women have less than corporate head jobs. They are not inferior, just as we who need their labor are not superior. That implication was never made.
Truth is, he was praising the guy who came to ask for work from him. When it comes to feeding and sheltering your family, the responsible thing is for pride to fly out of the window, and the father especially should do whatever he can to put food on the table. Not become a dependent of those who are doing whatever they have to.
***A single mother can only work so many hours in a day. And she pays for child care if she is earning enough. That is: not enough to pay for food, rent, utilties, transportation to and from work, and clothes for her children. Single mothers cannot get what you call “free medical attention” if they make more than $259.00 per month. I am unable to work all hours of every day because I have 3 young children that I must care for. I have to work only when my children are cared for. I cannot afford health insurance…period. Period. And even were I to find a high paying job, the pre existing conditions that I have would not be covered for 2 years…so I am still out of luck. And my spending habits have nothing to do with this. I am a person who can hold on to and make $20 stretch for many needs for 2 weeks. I hadn’t bought myself new clothes (Even undergarments) in about 5 years. All of my money goes to my kids needs. Needless to say, except for the few items someone else bought me something, I went without, except an occasional pair of $5 shoes from KMart.That is correct, you can have a full time 8 hour job and still not have enough to heat your house. Some people who are in the higher tax brackets sometimes do not have enough to pay their heating. Much depends on how a person chooses to spend the money they earn and how hard they want to work.
There are opportunites for almost all that want to work.
In most cases the poor have much better health care that they pay nothing for. There are those that are above the poor level that have trouble with dental and other care, but the poor can have whatever health care they need. There is much abuse that takes place at that level.
That is not how it is classified here, cannot compare it like that. It is based on income level here on who qualifies for the abundunce of free care.
There has to be some self responsibility.
Do we live in the same America? I think not. Unless an uninsured person qualifies for assistance, has the money to pay or experiences a medical emergency, he does go without health care.… and no one goes without health care.
Hospitals have to treat anyone who shows up . In addition the poor are covered by Medicaid. The overwheloming majority of people who lack health care are either are covered are temporarily out of job or , have the funds to pay for insurance but declined to do so. Mostly the young.Do we live in the same America? I think not. Unless an uninsured person qualifies for assistance, has the money to pay or experiences a medical emergency, he does go without health care.
Society’s most vulnerable should not be dependent only on emergency care - it’s a recipe for poor quality of life and financial disaster for the whole health care system.
The single worst malaise of our health care system I believe, is the failure to provide comprehensive, free or low cost preventive health care (including health education) so that less people end up with health emergencies or complicated illnesses.
I repeat. An adult (single mom of 4 with no help from father) who makes more than $259.00 per month in the state of louisiana is inelligable for free health care. The government couldn’t care less where that $260.00 per month is going to.Many personal experiences, but can you tell me specifically of those poor that cannot get healthcare for free?
The purpose of employment is to earn money to meet at least the needs of the employee’s responsibilities, within reason. The pride recieved from a menial job comes from knowing that you have done all that you could possibly do to take care of yourself and family…not lie around waiting for someone to take care of your needs and those of your family. You don’t have to have a high paying job to feel that sense of pride.I suppose one can give them a sense of pride when they are employed. I do not think being a servant for wealthier people will be conducive to that.
http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/photos_images/news_images/04-2008/chinese-poster_lg.jpg
Look at this propaganda poster. Look how it makes the person proud of his job. How could we instill that sense to people? Are most jobs in the hospitality or service sector provide a feeling of a contribution to society (and not merely enriching the managers of the company)?
BRAVO !!! BRAVO !!!Do we live in the same America? I think not. Unless an uninsured person qualifies for assistance, has the money to pay or experiences a medical emergency, he does go without health care.
Society’s most vulnerable should not be dependent only on emergency care - it’s a recipe for poor quality of life and financial disaster for the whole health care system.
The single worst malaise of our health care system I believe, is the failure to provide comprehensive, free or low cost preventive health care (including health education) so that less people end up with health emergencies or complicated illnesses.
Ribozyme posted:
I doubt “most people” base their perception on anything on one set of writings. People are more complex then that.I suppose most people base their perception on poverty in America from the writings of Robert Rector.
You are TOTALLY wrong in your statement!Hospitals have to treat anyone who shows up . In addition the poor are covered by Medicaid. The overwheloming majority of people who lack health care are either are covered are temporarily out of job or , have the funds to pay for insurance but declined to do so. Mostly the young.
You are TOTALLY wrong in your statement!
Going to the Emergency room does not equal treatment…
Nobody said they got equal treatment. The question was are people in America denied medical treatment. The answer is no.You are TOTALLY wrong in your statement!
Going to the Emergency room does not equal treatment…
So do you think the poor’s treatment is inadequate?Nobody said they got equal treatment. The question was are people in America denied medical treatment. The answer is no
Nobody said anything about equal treatment. I said going to a hospital does not equal recieving treatment. In other words, just because you go to a hospital does not mean that they are going to fix the problem. They are only required to stabalize your condition. And many times, that is all that the emergency physician can do. If you have more than a simple infection, you are told to go to your family doctor to recieve treatment for your problem. High blood pressure…stabalize it, and send to family physician. Heart pain…stabalize it and send to family physician. Only, poor people don’t have family physicians because they cannot afford to go to the doctor!Nobody said they got equal treatment. The question was are people in America denied medical treatment. The answer is no
In a perfect world everyone would have basic medical care, I would like to point out the fact that millions die every year from lack of basic medical care…you have no such problem.Lets say we re distribute all the money in the world to provide basic health care, fact is if we did their would be no money left over to treat patients with a poor prognosis, people who run up a million dollar bill and die anywayYou are TOTALLY wrong in your statement!
Going to the Emergency room does not equal treatment. I have been several times to the Emergency room for kidney stone attacks, for kidney stones too big to pass. I needed to go to a doctor and have medical procedures…which the hospital nor doctors are obliged to give if I do not present them with money up front and paid many times in full. You are talking upwards of $10,000.
I am poor!!! And if I, as a single mother of 4 with no help from the father of my children, earn as much as $260.00 per month, I am inelligible for Medicaid. Rent, food, utilities, my kids need for uniforms and school supplies and shoes are not even considered important. Anything earned above $259.00per month makes me inelligible for state health care.
And, even charity hospitals charge money for their services. I currently have a $500 bill with a charity hospital for one emergency room visit…which did not take care of the actual problem. They just identified the probable problem and took away the pain.
All other hospitals charge even more. They are only required to stabalize your condition if you go to the emergency room.
And I run into people all of the time who are not “young”, and are working themselves into the ground to support their families…and still can’t afford health care costs. It isn’t a matter of having the money and being unwilling. It is about the phenominal cost of health care. Employers keep most of the employees at a part time level just to keep from having to offer health insurance. that means that an employee works just short of 40 hours per week, but is still not given the option of health or retirement benefits.