Hello there,
I have been what they call a “church hopper” for years. My mom started me off on this when she took me to baptist churches and than to pentecostal churches, not being able to decide which one she liked better

. I entered the fray when I became an adult. I had what to most people would have been a minor event (A girl that I liked had married someone else) become a major heartache for me, and it lead to a deep sense of grieving and loss. I started to study with quasi Christian groups such as the Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses, but finally deciding that I was a Seventh Day Adventist at heart. I stayed there, but while I believed, I certainly didn’t live according to what they believed in. I listened to Rock Music, Ate meat, and Smoked both weed and tobacco. Later, I became even more confused, and started to investigate the new age (Particularly Shamanism- attracted to it because of a Techno band that promoted that religion) After this, I decided I needed a “Compromise” between new age claims and the traditional Christian beliefs that I grew up with, and decided to become a baptized mormon. I stayed with that church until I read a book called “Transformed by truth” by Joseph Tkach, Junior. It described how a group that used to be a cult turned around to embrace fundamentalist christians. I joined them and was happy for a while - but soon got tired of the judgementalism and pride that this particular church engaged in. I also got tired of it in another church that I was going to that was close to the VOA apartment complex I lived at. A friend of mine, An Agnostic, talked about how in his church, they had marched in the Civil Rights movement and how they church that he had gone to wasn’t opposed to people thinking for themselves. That’s how I embraced Catholocism, because a good friend of mine saw how unhappy I was and was willing to help me out. I still get confused sometimes, but I am infinitely more happy and content in the Catholic church than I have ever been in any other church. They are less apt to judge, for one thing- and their approach to scripture is quite refreshing. Instead of believing the bible dropped out of the sky and should be interpreted in a fundamentalist way (Except, of course, John 6 and John 20:23, which according to Fundamentalists, are merely figurative), A contextualist tries to first discover what type of literature he or she is investigating and tries to best understand what it was saying to the people who it was written to. I enjoy this inspiring and refreshing approach to Bible Study. Have a good day to all, and God bless…
Tommy