The proposal is not to do anything too dramatic. If we look at the percentages, they’re talking about increasing the number of Hispanic children from 3% to 6%. That’s not a take over of Catholic schools.
I think that another consideration is the fact that Catholic schools in the USA were founded for poor children. When Elizabeth Ann Seton founded the Catholic School system it was part of a campaign on the part of Bishop John Carrol to ensure that Catholics got a free education, because there were not schools for them to get a good education that was within their means. The Catholics at the time were mostly Irish and English farmers.
Today, the poorest Catholic sector is the Latino sector. This continues an American Catholic tradition of educating the poorest Catholics.
I think that what happened was that Catholic schools became the privilege of the wealthy, not just in the USA, but in many countries in the Americas. There is a real need to recover the original missionary role of the Catholic school. That role was to poor kids.
The three great founders of Catholic education: Don Bosco, John Baptist de La Salle and Elizabeth Ann Seton had a vision of Catholic schools educating the masses of the poor, not the middle classes or higher. If we stop to think of who makes up the poorest group of Catholics in the USA, it is the Latino and the Haitian population.
So, raising the number of students from 3% to 6% is not that much of a miracle. It sounds like a lot, but it’s really not.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF
