B
bassmansteiny
Guest
Can’t read the full story because I don’t have a subscription to WSJ. Thanks for sharing with us though
Nope. It was not the moderators who made the post, it was you. I am done. Welcome to the Ignore bucket.So perhaps your complaint is against the moderators who allowed this thread to exist, not with me.
Who called him? Joining the military in this country is completely voluntary.Im sorry I used the wrong term. He was called to serve
The absence of official Church teaching to that effect is notable. That is because there is no such teaching.No you may Not vote Democrat when you are Catholic. There are many apologetics to answer the questions,
The original poster asked people’s view on the matter. Hence views are being offered.Just don’t try to make a blanket pronouncement that everyone else has to do as you do. Not your job and not your business.
Not really. One can say, for instance, they do not support smoking, but they do support the right of people to smoke in certain circumstances. This is not a euphemism for supporting smoking.The second is simply a euphemism for the first.
OH! Don’t throw me in that briar patch, Br’er Fox!Nope. It was not the moderators who made the post, it was you. I am done. Welcome to the ignore bucket.
You know, that is really inaccurate. It is the Democrats who have the most diverse party in Congress.of course not, the Dems only have issues with certain religions. The Dems have already targeted the nuns for contraception, they don’t need head coverings.
If that’s true (and having grown up in the Ozarks, I’m sure the “Dixiecrats” had plenty of opposition) at least they didn’t insist that Catholic chaplains “change their religion” like Hillary Clinton insisted that we do in order to accommodate abortion, or threaten them with ruinous fines like Obama did to the Little Sisters and other religious orders if they didn’t provide abortifacients to their employees and themselves.You know, that is really inaccurate. It is the Democrats who have the most diverse party in Congress.
Did you know that conservative Republicans blocked any Catholic priest from being chaplain of the House until about 2000? That’s a fact.
No one was asking them to sit there and hand out pills. As employers the plans were expected to include certain coverage, no one said they had to use it. Now I get the objection and I agree with the exemptions and in my opinion they should have been in place from the beginning, but no one was being asked to “provide abortifacients” any more than they were being asked to “provide” open heart surgery.if they didn’t provide abortifacients to their employees and themselves.
Not if they follow the party platform.The question is can a Democrat be pro Life?
So then, yes? I don’t know anyone who follows their party platform 100%.Not if they follow the party platform.