Can a catholic recieve an anointing prayer from a non-catholic pastor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter allana
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry - should have said “being properly commissioned by the Church through Holy Orders.”

Whew! Thanks for bringing that to my attention! 😃
By your church, but since the questions was about non-Catholic clergy, then the proper commission is moot.
 
And what words are those exactly?
Well for starters, off the top of my head, how about," Thou art Peter (Cephas). Upon this rock, I will build my Church and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it". Of course I think a study of the History of the Early (Catholic) Church would be a prerequisite to an understanding of the line of descendency from St. Peter to the Popes.
 
As if your priests are always properly disposed? I think the Pope’s latest apology shoot that theory down, no doesnt it? Or are you trying to infer that those outside of the RCC are by default no properly disposed?
Thankfully, since it is God Himself who acts, the Sacraments do not depend on the disposition of the Priest himself. So, that kind of shoots down your little theory now, doesn’t it?

Please don’t insult us by pretending that all protestant, or any other denominations ministers are always properly disposed.

Now, as you may have noticed, this is a Catholic forum and a Catholic asked the question, so no, they ought not to do that. Even just a regular Catholic layman or woman, cannot do that.
 
Thankfully, since it is God Himself who acts, the Sacraments do not depend on the disposition of the Priest himself. So, that kind of shoots down your little theory now, doesn’t it?

Please don’t insult us by pretending that all protestant, or any other denominations ministers are always properly disposed.

Now, as you may have noticed, this is a Catholic forum and a Catholic asked the question, so no, they ought not to do that. Even just a regular Catholic layman or woman, cannot do that.
Well now, alhers, I suppose a Catholic COULD be anointed by a pastor of another Faith, but it would probably do little good spiritually for the Catholic at least. I don’t know how that would work for non Catholics unless the pastor could be proven to be a priestly descendent of St. Peter, ecclesiastically speaking of course.😉
 
As if your priests are always properly disposed? I think the Pope’s latest apology shoot that theory down, no doesnt it? Or are you trying to infer that those outside of the RCC are by default no properly disposed?
Just as the pastors of other faiths, our priests are not saints. Some are trying to be, but it is hard to know which ones until the full story is known. No excuses here as to what happened as a result of the warped humans who called themselves priests. As for my opinion, I think they should have been tried in a public courtroom. The Church was too easy on them.

If my memory serves me, I think Henry II had a little trouble with his Archbishop More because of a difference of opinion as to how a priest who is thought to be guilty of a crime can be tried. By the Church, or by the King’s magistrate? So the punishment meted out to those who recently were found to be guilty of sexual misdemeanors is not a new story for the Church. How would your church have handled the situation?
 
Well for starters, off the top of my head, how about," Thou art Peter (Cephas). Upon this rock, I will build my Church and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it". Of course I think a study of the History of the Early (Catholic) Church would be a prerequisite to an understanding of the line of descendency from St. Peter to the Popes.
You do realize of course that the Greek for the verse you are referring to uses tow DIFFERENT words for rock, right? One means a large rock, but the word petra for the rock upon the church is built mens a group of rocks. Name change is not the sole criteria, remember James and his brother were given a name by Jesus as well, Boanerges. Additionally, if Peter was the rock upon which the church would be built, why was he not the head of the church at Jerusalem, where the church began? It would only make logical sense if he were, but he was not.
 
Thankfully, since it is God Himself who acts, the Sacraments do not depend on the disposition of the Priest himself. So, that kind of shoots down your little theory now, doesn’t it?

Please don’t insult us by pretending that all protestant, or any other denominations ministers are always properly disposed.

Now, as you may have noticed, this is a Catholic forum and a Catholic asked the question, so no, they ought not to do that. Even just a regular Catholic layman or woman, cannot do that.
Shoots my theory down? No, not at all, it supports it, as it is indeed GOD who works, not the priest. Is not God free to work through whomever he wills, or dies your church not allow him to do so. Did not Jesus tell His disciples who were on the “its our group or nothing” kick that whoever is not against you is for you. Do not stop them. Remember that little instruction? I in no way implied that all clergy of ANY denomination are properly disposed, you just seem overly sensitive to the point of misintepretation. Wonder why that is. Seems nothing more than the usual control MO. Dont go anywhere else, yada yada. That being said, I find that the intent of the post herself was less than genuine.
 
Just as the pastors of other faiths, our priests are not saints. Some are trying to be, but it is hard to know which ones until the full story is known. No excuses here as to what happened as a result of the warped humans who called themselves priests. As for my opinion, I think they should have been tried in a public courtroom. The Church was too easy on them.

If my memory serves me, I think Henry II had a little trouble with his Archbishop More because of a difference of opinion as to how a priest who is thought to be guilty of a crime can be tried. By the Church, or by the King’s magistrate? So the punishment meted out to those who recently were found to be guilty of sexual misdemeanors is not a new story for the Church. How would your church have handled the situation?
What do you presume my church to be? You are correct in your history, however, not being an Anglican, it means little to me.
 
“Force results in Rebellion, but Compromise can bring Peace.”

This signature concerns me, as it leads to negotiating the truth away in the interest of “peace” Such peace will inevitably be false. Examples of this is the political world of the past century are legion,

OP, much better that you learn and know your faith, defend your faith, and ask family members to participate, as much as they can, in the mass. That leads them to the fulness of truth. The truth may offend some. So? JOMO.

Christ’s peace be always with you.
 
Hi, i am a catholic who recently attended a thanksgiving at some family who attend one of those ‘evangalistic healing ministry’. At the end of the
service their pastor asked all the family members (myself included) to come forward for ‘prayer’, the pastor puts olive oil on his hand then places his hand on your forehead and prays for you. Now as a Catholic am i allowed to recieve such ‘anointing prayers’? If not why? Thanks!
What did you receive from it any thing? Did he pray in the name of Jesus?
 
OMG!!! Only priests can offer licit prayer now??? You guys are TOO much…read Proverbs about those who cause dissension…all you all do is dig your heels in to defend your denomination, all others be damned!
Go, receive that prayer, it is probably filled with more faith than you may get from somewhere else. Those heremay be afraid that the Holy Spirit may touch you and lead you to Truth, not their control.
Slow down! Have you heard of theological error? You know a church within a block or two which practices error in your eyes. Since this “anointing” is nothing more than a common prayer, and simulates the true Sacrament of anointing, why participate in what amounts to less? Why settle for a simulation? For a Catholic to participate in anything resembling a Sacrament, draws him or her away from the fulness of truth. This is error.

We are not a denomination. Please do not insult the Church of Christ with such a demeaning term. “Denomination” connotes “less”. Clearly, we have more, not less. More history. More Sacraments. More devotions to Christ. Actual Apostolic succession. Can you trace your ordination directly back to one of the Twelve? Every Catholic priest can. Big difference.

A priest has Apostolic succession and authority to administer the true Sacraments. The guy on the corner, no matter where he went to seminary, does not. Believe what you will and please allow us the same freedom. And, twisting scripture, whether Greek, Aramiac, or Hebrew, will only bring the “big guns” to bear upon you. Your interpretation is held by us to be error. Same opinion you currently hold about us. That’s all.
 
Shoots my theory down? No, not at all, it supports it, as it is indeed GOD who works, not the priest. Is not God free to work through whomever he wills, or dies your church not allow him to do so. Did not Jesus tell His disciples who were on the “its our group or nothing” kick that whoever is not against you is for you. Do not stop them. Remember that little instruction? I in no way implied that all clergy of ANY denomination are properly disposed, you just seem overly sensitive to the point of misintepretation. Wonder why that is. Seems nothing more than the usual control MO. Dont go anywhere else, yada yada. That being said, I find that the intent of the post herself was less than genuine.
the coach, you said in post # 14 “As if your priests are always properly disposed? I think the Pope’s latest apology shoot that theory down, no doesnt it? Or are you trying to infer that those outside of the RCC are by default no properly disposed”?
…and that is what I replied to in my post #23

You can do whatever you want in your own particular denomination, but as a Catholic, which the OP is, there is no need to go elsewhere, as we have the Fullness of Truth, Jesus HImself, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, and we have His word on that. Why would we need to go anywhere else for anything?

I am not saying **you **can’t do that if you choose to, I am saying that as a Catholic there is no reason to go elsewhree, no matter what state a Priest’s soul is in, God still acts through His Sacraments that He established and founded in His Church of which we Catholics are part of the Mystical Body of Christ.
 
Slow down! Have you heard of theological error? You know a church within a block or two which practices error in your eyes. Since this “anointing” is nothing more than a common prayer, and simulates the true Sacrament of anointing, why participate in what amounts to less? Why settle for a simulation? For a Catholic to participate in anything resembling a Sacrament, draws him or her away from the fulness of truth. This is error.

We are not a denomination. Please do not insult the Church of Christ with such a demeaning term. “Denomination” connotes “less”. Clearly, we have more, not less. More history. More Sacraments. More devotions to Christ. Actual Apostolic succession. Can you trace your ordination directly back to one of the Twelve? Every Catholic priest can. Big difference.

A priest has Apostolic succession and authority to administer the true Sacraments. The guy on the corner, no matter where he went to seminary, does not. Believe what you will and please allow us the same freedom. And, twisting scripture, whether Greek, Aramiac, or Hebrew, will only bring the “big guns” to bear upon you. Your interpretation is held by us to be error. Same opinion you currently hold about us. That’s all.
Of course you are a denomination, nothing more. Tracing apostolic succession means what? Paul’s churches wouldnt have necessarily been able to, so what does that mean? Other Catholic churches other than the RCC can, so what does that mean? Ordination is to come from God, is it not? More devotions to Christ? You mean mroe words and rituals? Well, we know what Jesus felt about that, now dont we? Yes, the apostolic success gives authority for YOUR sacraments, it means little outside of your denomination. Big guns? Bring them. I have not twisted Scripture in the least. The Greek is the Greek. You have formulated an entire Papal structure on what, one verse out of four Gospels? Yes, you are right, you DONT want to go there. God is not to be contained in your little box. The Gospels speak very differently.
 
the coach, you said in post # 14 “As if your priests are always properly disposed? I think the Pope’s latest apology shoot that theory down, no doesnt it? Or are you trying to infer that those outside of the RCC are by default no properly disposed”?
…and that is what I replied to in my post #23

You can do whatever you want in your own particular denomination, but as a Catholic, which the OP is, there is no need to go elsewhere, as we have the Fullness of Truth, Jesus HImself, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, and we have His word on that. Why would we need to go anywhere else for anything?

I am not saying **you **can’t do that if you choose to, I am saying that as a Catholic there is no reason to go elsewhree, no matter what state a Priest’s soul is in, God still acts through His Sacraments that He established and founded in His Church of which we Catholics are part of the Mystical Body of Christ.
Yes you are right, as a Catholic, she is to submit to control. However, and I will say it again, the OP is suspect anyway in terms of intention.
 
Yes you are right, as a Catholic, she is to submit to control. However, and I will say it again, the OP is suspect anyway in terms of intention.
I would submit, and as a Catholic, do submit to Jesus anytime. You go ahead and think you are right about us and I will go ahead and stay in Jesus’ CHURCH, that He founded. We are NOT a denomination. We are the CHURCH, One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic. St. Paul is one of our greatest Saints and Martyr’s.
 
Of course you are a denomination, nothing more. Tracing apostolic succession means what? Paul’s churches wouldnt have necessarily been able to, so what does that mean? Other Catholic churches other than the RCC can, so what does that mean? Ordination is to come from God, is it not? More devotions to Christ? You mean mroe words and rituals? Well, we know what Jesus felt about that, now dont we? Yes, the apostolic success gives authority for YOUR sacraments, it means little outside of your denomination. Big guns? Bring them. I have not twisted Scripture in the least. The Greek is the Greek. You have formulated an entire Papal structure on what, one verse out of four Gospels? Yes, you are right, you DONT want to go there. God is not to be contained in your little box. The Gospels speak very differently.
Sorry to hear that your heart is set against learning the truth about Christ’s church. That is indeed a shame. Your categorical statements of alleged “fact” make you appear superior in wisdom and knowledge to Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp and, in fact, all of the early church fathers. Do you believe you are superior to them?

Where on earth do you think we got our faith? Man? Yes! The man named Jesus. We have the faith that was handed on from Christ to the Apostles, and from the Apostles to their successors, up to this day. It is indeed tragic that so many have been lead astray by the spirit of antichrist (not you, of course) and have come up with their own, personal, order-from-the-menu faiths.

It pains me to remind that each of your “arguments” have been heard here a thousand times, and dismantled as just as many. So, what is your real purpose here? To learn? I hope so.

Please take the time to learn about what you criticize.
 
“If anyone prays with heretics, he is a heretic.”
St. Agatho I, SCN:XXI:635

"No one can pray with heretics and be a Catholic. "
St. Agatho, SCN:XI:635

I assume you mean Pope St. Agatho (d.680). Clearly many popes, including Benedict XVI, are heretics. Well, Vatican II did happen and actually did some good. Among the good is a strong commitment to ecumenicism. Perhaps some history would help to communicate my basic point. In 1960, Archbishop Ritter of St. Louis declared (and ordered the declaration read from the pulpit) that no Catholic student may attend a non-Catholic institution [of higher education] unless written permission was obtained from the Archdiocese which would be granted only “for just and serious reasons.” (Time Magazine June 20, 1960)

I suspect that Pope Agatho would agree (though I have never made a study of of the writings of seventh century popes) even though the Catholic Encyclopedia describes him as a “affable and charitable man.” This is the sort of reasoning that reflects a lack of trust in the Catholic integrity of the laity. Archbishop Ritter was not speaking of faith or morals, nor (I suspect) was Pope Agatho). Picking and chosing quotations from a 2000 plus year Church history is not good practice. I think the thought and practice of more recent Popes is more useful. Or, perhaps some posters to this thread would prefer a return to the edicts of Archbishop Ritter.

I have attended non-Catholic funeral services and weddings and ecumenical services with my fellow Catholic parishioners. I have been prayed for and blessed by Protestant Ministers and I have prayed for them and with them for our common causes (They know where I stand as an orthodox Catholic.) The OP did not seek out a non-Catholic communion or the annointing (Nor do I, for the record). It is also not clear if the OP did participate regularly in such services which would be a different story. Nor is it clear why the OP was at the service. Catholic submission to the Church is not the same as, say, the submission of extreme jihadists to Allah.
 
Yes you are right, as a Catholic, she is to submit to control. However, and I will say it again, the OP is suspect anyway in terms of intention.
Interesting…as a former Catholic and a ‘reverend’ you use some pretty harsh word!
 
i know what you mean. I can’t think of the text off the top of my head, but I remember reading in the Catechism of the Catholic Church that the people born into Protestantism, who are therefore Protestant through no fault of their own, are not heretics. I’m glad that, being a former Protestant for 18 years, Jesus led me back home to his Church. For those who are still Protestant and have not had that tug in their lives, I take comfort in knowing that Christ still loves them and has a place for them in his Kingdom. I’d be deeply saddened if we were taught to believe that Protestants who didn’t accept the Catholic Church were going to hell. That is more a Protestant mentality than a Catholic one. There are many Protestant groups who believe that we are going to hell, yet we believe that, apart from Rome, they still have a chance for salvation.

[Edited]
[Edited]

If someone knowingly rejects the tenents of the Catholic faith, the opportune word being knowingly, they are indeed heretics. That would include millions upon millions of the separated brethren

There seems to be this delusional belief that ONLY Baptized Catholics who fall away from the faith can be heretics and that simply is not true. In Christianity, heresy is a "theological or religious opinion or doctrine maintained in opposition, or held to be contrary, to the Roman Catholic Church and to some degree the Orthodox Churches.

The protestants are not in any way considered to be Orthodox and are not even part of any established Church by definition. It is of great interest to note that 2 Peter Chapter 2 gives a vivid description of heresy and heretics, and it comes very very close to the situation that we have today. Very close indeed.

Something I think people should give credence to.
 
Of course you are a denomination, nothing more.
You say so.
Tracing apostolic succession means what? Paul’s churches wouldnt have necessarily been able to, so what does that mean? Other Catholic churches other than the RCC can, so what does that mean? Ordination is to come from God, is it not?
You know scripture. But, when you cherry-pick, remember that each cherry has a pit.
More devotions to Christ? You mean mroe words and rituals? Well, we know what Jesus felt about that, now dont we?
Well, you certainly do! Tell us, please! Do you have Christ in the Flesh in your church? Not in printed form, squeezed between the covers, but in the Flesh. Tell us about your contemplative prayers. Tell us about your Adoration. Tell us about your church’s martyrs. Tell us about your Saints.
Yes, the apostolic success gives authority for YOUR sacraments, it means little outside of your denomination.
It is a genuine shame that the Sacraments which Christ instituted mean little or nothing to you. If what Christ did means so little, how much can Christ Himself mean?
Big guns? Bring them. I have not twisted Scripture in the least. The Greek is the Greek. You have formulated an entire Papal structure on what, one verse out of four Gospels?
Pardon me, but the authority of the Catholic church was instituted by Christ and is well documented in the Gospels, in Acts and all of the writings of the early church fathers. You have drunk deeply of the well of anti-Catholic bigotry.

The 2,000 year old church is a product of its founder, Jesus Christ. He gave unprecedented power to the Apostles, knowing what they would do with it. Are you wiser than Christ? You appear to have done little outside of second-guessing our Lord.
Yes, you are right, you DONT want to go there. God is not to be contained in your little box. The Gospels speak very differently.
Yes, they apparently tell you to disregard Paul; to disregard Peter; to disregard all of the twelve, to disregard all of the the early Bishops and fathers of the faith, as well as any form of continuity in your church. The gates of hell have not, and will not prevail against the Catholic church. Luther took his best shot. He’s dead. She’s still there. Satan in all of his forms has taken his best shot. He has been rebuffed. She’s still there.

IMO, you love the concept of Christ. It’s His reality that troubles you.

If you want to do the world a favor, bring the Protestant world together, then come back and we’ll talk. Word.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top