C
chrysostim83
Guest
Exactly right as usual, Dakota.
To go on a bit in the same vein, it must be possible to distinguish different sorts of love by more than their object. Otherwise no one would be able to see a difference between the love they have for their friends and the love they have for their siblings; they wouldn’t even be able to see the difference between the love a man has for a sister and the (chaste) love her fiance might have for her!
Hopefully everything is starting to make sense. If someone says what distinguishes gay people is the sort of love they tend to experience for members of their own sex, it is a non sequitur (given where we’ve gotten to) to object that a man can love his brother without being gay. The objects are the same, as far as biological sex goes, but the types of love are totally different.
To go on a bit in the same vein, it must be possible to distinguish different sorts of love by more than their object. Otherwise no one would be able to see a difference between the love they have for their friends and the love they have for their siblings; they wouldn’t even be able to see the difference between the love a man has for a sister and the (chaste) love her fiance might have for her!
Hopefully everything is starting to make sense. If someone says what distinguishes gay people is the sort of love they tend to experience for members of their own sex, it is a non sequitur (given where we’ve gotten to) to object that a man can love his brother without being gay. The objects are the same, as far as biological sex goes, but the types of love are totally different.