Those statements from our second grade catechism show that absolution occurs on its own **prior to **completion of the penance. Forgiveness is not contingent upon completion of the penance, at least not according to these statements we both memorized.
I don’t know how many times I can repeat the same thing. I guess this will be the last.
All Sacraments require matter and form in order to be imparted. The Sacrament of Penance is no exception.
**The matter in the Sacrament of Penance is the three actions of the penitant:
Contrition
Confession
Performance of Penance
The form in the Sacrament of Penance is the words of the priest:
I absolve you**.
All four of these things are necessary in order to impart the Sacrament.
So, the priest can say, “I absolve you,” and he can mean, “I absolve you,” but that absolution is contingent upon the action of the person confessing doing what they are supposed to do in order to receive the Sacrament.
One of the three things they MUST do is perform their penance.
Now, we were taught to perform you penance as soon as you leave the confessional.
Barring some completely unforseen force, some completely random act of God, that should imply that 99% of all penances would be completed at the time of the confession.
If a person “intends” to complete their penance, they WILL complete their penance.
Now, in the 1-2% of the time when that is not possible, and the person genuinely forgets to perform their penance, I would say they were not really properly disposed to receive the sacrament and they DID NOT receive the sacrament. How do you forget your penance?
I have covered the act of dying before completing the penance. You are forgiven.
So the idea that “intending” and accomplishing are two wildly different ideas, is not really valid, especially in light of the fact that their are other places, including the Coucil of Trent where this is spelled out much more clearly and unequivocally. No penance. No Sacrament.
As I said before, the priest did NOT absolve until penance was completed when there were public penances. That is not practical now that penances have become so lenient. But the spirit of the Sacrament remains unchanged. Penance is necessary for the absolution to be imparted. Penance is necessary for the Sacrament to be imparted.
In parting, everyone who receives the Sacrament of Penance learns about the Sacrament prior to reception. I learned that the performance of the penance was absolutely required in order to have received the Sacrament. My husband learned the exact same thing.
I don’t really know what the background of the people here is, but again, this is an issue that can be resolved by doing research.
I don’t understand why someone would want to dig in to a position that essentially states that performing your penance isn’t really necessary in order to have received the Sacrament.
**Obviously, if you honestly believe that, and you aren’t just here trying to argue with someone, then you can NEVER be properly disposed for the Sacrament by your own admission. If you don’t believe you HAVE to perform the penance in order to be forgiven, then why would you INTEND to perform the penance. It is simply a matter of choice, and you could just as easily choose not to. **
In fact, isn’t that just what you are advocating in this thread. Essentially you are saying to the person inquiring here: “don’t bother doing your penance, it isn’t really necessary, you’re still forgiven.”
I hope this person, although I very seriously doubt if this actually happened, does not believe you. And, although you can not seem to admit that you are wrong here, I hope you don’t really believe and act upon what you are saying, for the sake of your soul.
If you are Catholic that is, and have ever even gone to Confession.