Can Catholics Vote Democrat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adawgj
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I haven’t voted democrat in ages and will never do it.
There is something so evil about it. It is now a hardcore leftist propaganda machine.
I look at candidates. Occasionally I find one that is on the Republican side, but I never find one that is on the democrat side.

I also remember how the democrat administration vetoed partial birth abortion. Really? They had no problem sticking a tube into the skull of a half born baby?

I prefer to vote a mosquito into office before I vote for a party that if not put on check would condone infanticide.

To kill anyone is to kill God. Over and over and over…
 
But the legislature actually imposed the tax right?
Yes, it increased the funding and imposed the tax. I wonder what would have happened had the legislature done nothing. Could the court have fined the legislators jointly and severally for failing to introduce and pass a new funding bill?

In any case, the question has now arisen again, but it may be compromised in the legislature without a lawsuit this time. In most states, only legislatures can impose taxes. I don’t see how a court could even direct that a particular amount of funding be passed by a legislature.
 
The students suffer because government administers the schools.
That’s why they are called government schools. Its time to get rid of them completely. More money gets spent on them every year, and every year the students learn less. I am tired of my tax money being wasted.
 
I have enough problems with both parties that I generally don’t bother voting. Even a Catholic party probably wouldn’t satisfy me. What would a Catholic party’s stance on the capital gains tax be? Rick Santorum is super-Catholic but I didn’t like his stance on the War in Iraq, gays in the military, and probably some other issues.

Can Catholics vote Democrat? Yes. But most Catholics should really find both parties very hard to vote for.
 
Maybe a private school then?
I was actually thinking about after school tutoring once DD is out of college and expenses go down (I won’t need quite as much of a high paying / high pressure job then and can simplify)
 
I have enough problems with both parties that I generally don’t bother voting. Even a Catholic party probably wouldn’t satisfy me. What would a Catholic party’s stance on the capital gains tax be? Rick Santorum is super-Catholic but I didn’t like his stance on the War in Iraq, gays in the military, and probably some other issues.

Can Catholics vote Democrat? Yes. But most Catholics should really find both parties very hard to vote for.
I see no reason why Catholics should find it hard to oppose a party that supports intrinsic evils. Only the Dem party does that. There is little likelihood that some will find any party to their personal tastes, as your post illustrates. But for me, it isn’t a matter of that. It’s a matter of “being counted” when it comes to opposing intrinsic evils. Political nihilism does not do that.
 
Not too surprisingly, it was a blessing in disguise to the unaffected Kansas side suburbs as people fled the KCMo school district.
.
Otherwise known as white flight.

I don’t want my kids going to school with those kids.
 
Don’t get me wrong: I wouldn’t mind teaching middle or high school kids…and I would probably be very, very good at it. However, not with the curriculum that is used (at least in public schools around here) and certainly not under the restrictions that are used (at least in public schools around here).
It’s the GOP who supports our teachers being force to teach material simply so kids can pass a test- stifling teaching flexibility and engendering critical thinking in our children.
 
I see no reason why Catholics should find it hard to oppose a party that supports intrinsic evils. Only the Dem party does that. There is little likelihood that some will find any party to their personal tastes, as your post illustrates. But for me, it isn’t a matter of that. It’s a matter of “being counted” when it comes to opposing intrinsic evils. Political nihilism does not do that.
That’s bunk.

If Conservatives idea that a Catholic Party" means “teaching” folks how to “make better choices”, “work harder”, and “pick themselves up by their bootstraps”, then that is no Catholic Party.

It sounds like some folks just want a hyper-Republican Party- or just another Tea Party that says “Hey we agree with the Pope”. We could call it the Tea Party for the Pope- The TTP Party.

Maybe run Michael Voris for President eh?

There is nothing in Catholic Social Teaching constantly pushing for lower taxes, more autonomy for businesses, and the reduction of Government Social Programs.

In other words my Catholic Party and others’ Catholic Party would be Pro-Life, opposed to same sex marriage, and euthanasia, but would have virtually NOTHING, and I do mean NOTHING else in common.

Not on. . . . .
Role of Government
Education
Environment
Religious Freedom
Immigration
The role of the Military
Regulation of Businesses
Gun Control
Medical Insurance
Social Supports
Dealing with Racism, oppression, and institutionalized discrimination

We would be as far from the East is from the West- at least if what I get from CAF posters actually reflects their thinking.
 
It’s the GOP who supports our teachers being force to teach material simply so kids can pass a test- stifling teaching flexibility and engendering critical thinking in our children.
And here I thought Common Core was a Dem idea. Who knew. 🤷
 
It’s the GOP who supports our teachers being force to teach material simply so kids can pass a test- stifling teaching flexibility and engendering critical thinking in our children.
Those weren’t the restrictions to which I was referring.

Having said that, though, if you’re complaining about “no child left behind”, please remember: that bill passed 384 to 45 (with 10 democrats and 34 republicans voting against), while it passed 91 - 8 in the Senate (with 2 democrats and 6 republicans voting against)

If that’s not bipartisan, I don’t know what is…🤷

I actually agree in principle with your criticism…in principle.
 
I would prefer that the government grants or loans didn’t exist at all. They have the effect of raising tuition costs for everybody.
So then you also prefer to get rid of the mortgage interest deduction on your income tax? That’s a pretty huge giveaway that benefits only a fraction of the most needy – those who have the means to save for a down payment. The rest of the deduction goes to people who own houses and who really don’t need the help from Uncle Sam. Oh yeah, and the deduction inflates prices on houses too!

I guess you’d also prefer that the government get out of the business of road building too, since since the constant impulse to build more road and add more lanes just erases the price signal associated with travel by motor vehicle. And developers price the improvement in travel time associated with building a new road between undeveloped land and a job center. They’re willing to pay more for that undeveloped land, so the road has inflated prices! Same thing for port dredging, bridge building, airport construction, and other government infrastructure projects.

I’d suppose you’d also suggest that we get rid of the tax deduction for employers on their employees’ health insurance. All that extra insurance beyond what the market will bear results in higher demand for health care. That raises prices too!

While we’re at it, why don’t we get rid of the subsidy for security on private property. Police protection of your home from burglary or invasion surely means that you can claim a higher price for it, which is kinda unfair since you could use that extra money to hire your own security guard. Fire departments too!

Heck, while we’re at it, the existence of a military distorts the market as well, by providing subsidy to everyone and preventing them from having to arm themselves. Of course, our naval patrols in the Persian Gulf are also artificially driving down the price for oil, which disadvantages other energy sources not so dependent on the military protection of shipping lanes.

Clearly, I’m being satirical here. Unless you’re a radical libertarian or anarchist, you’re not going to call many of these government programs an improper use of government money. The point is that the U.S. economy is not a truly free market. The government is involved in regulating the economy, from the Federal Reserve’s setting of interest rates to your town’s zoning your neighborhood a residential area.
 
I don’t think anyone denies there is a role of the government but waste certainly is a frequent occurrence in government run programs.
 
If Conservatives idea that a Catholic Party" means “teaching” folks how to “make better choices”, “work harder”, and “pick themselves up by their bootstraps”, then that is no Catholic Party.

It sounds like some folks just want a hyper-Republican Party- or just another Tea Party that says “Hey we agree with the Pope”. We could call it the Tea Party for the Pope- The TTP Party.

Maybe run Michael Voris for President eh?
Michael Voris is a monarchist.

Keep in mind that after the 2012 election, there were plenty of threads here on CAF talking about how Franco wasn’t really such a bad guy, and how democracy just doesn’t work. The people who put him in power were a combination of monarchists (Carlists) and fascists (Falangists). But he was stridently Catholic, so that was OK to many. Never mind the mass graves. Or Guernica. Or the extrajudicial murders.

The irony with Church Militant types is that the Pope himself is preaching against the politicization of the Church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top