Can I go visit everything at my local Mormon Temple?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jean_Marie_1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
oh wow, I never noticed, thats good to know. I always thought it was a good “nut shell” for things. so I guess I was on the right track and didnt know it. Although it does look like they can cut you off if you spout nonsense. ah well.
 
Thank you zerinus - that is one of the best and most enlightening articles I have read on the subject. I think the best way to learn about each other is to learn the language and culture each other use, and I think that article does that beautifully.
BTW, I need to admit I stand corrected on Mormons subscribing to the same teachings as Arius. Per that article, we do not, in fact our Doctrine even supports the Nicene creed, Roman Creed, Creed of the Apostles, Caesarean Creed, and Constantinopalitan Creed, assuming they were quoted correctly in that document. Our doctrine just does not support the Athanasean Creed, and some of the beliefs of “one being” as in the digit form however. So, Mormons do believe in the concept of the Trinity as it stands in those creeds, just not that Trinity of the Athanasean creed and as many Catholics believe today.

I did not realize before that article the true beliefs of Arius. I agree with everyone else here now - he was a heretic. Now that I understand what Arius taught, I just wanted to be clear Mormons do NOT agree with him.
 
BTW, I need to admit I stand corrected on Mormons subscribing to the same teachings as Arius. Per that article, we do not, in fact our Doctrine even supports the Nicene creed, Roman Creed, Creed of the Apostles, Caesarean Creed, and Constantinopalitan Creed, assuming they were quoted correctly in that document. Our doctrine just does not support the Athanasean Creed, and some of the beliefs of “one being” as in the digit form however. So, Mormons do believe in the concept of the Trinity as it stands in those creeds, just not that Trinity of the Athanasean creed and as many Catholics believe today.
LDS would certainly not have any problems with the Apostles Creed. But the other creeds add unnecessary materials to it that strictly speaking would not sit well with pure biblical theology, hence also with LDS doctrine.
I did not realize before that article the true beliefs of Arius. I agree with everyone else here now - he was a heretic. Now that I understand what Arius taught, I just wanted to be clear Mormons do NOT agree with him.
That is correct. LDS doctrine is not Arian by any means.

zerinus
 
BTW, I need to admit I stand corrected on Mormons subscribing to the same teachings as Arius. Per that article, we do not, in fact our Doctrine even supports the Nicene creed, Roman Creed, Creed of the Apostles, Caesarean Creed, and Constantinopalitan Creed, assuming they were quoted correctly in that document. Our doctrine just does not support the Athanasean Creed, and some of the beliefs of “one being” as in the digit form however. So, Mormons do believe in the concept of the Trinity as it stands in those creeds, just not that Trinity of the Athanasean creed and as many Catholics believe today.

I did not realize before that article the true beliefs of Arius. I agree with everyone else here now - he was a heretic. Now that I understand what Arius taught, I just wanted to be clear Mormons do NOT agree with him.
I believe that if you look at what abinadi says about God in the BoM (One God and his explanation for Jesus being called the son of God) and then add context by looking at the witnesses testimony in the beginning of the BoM (glory be the father, son, holy spirit, etc.) you can make a pretty strong case that Joseph and the early LDS started out Trinitarian. if you will read Lecture 5 of the Lectures on faith (used to be part of the D&C now the D&C intro still refers to it as “profitable” for teaching) you see a shift to a binitarian view (Two personages Father and Son, only son has a body and the holy spirit is their shared mind) it wasn’t until late JS/early BY that the LDS became henotheistic with a three Gods view of our world. The BoM shows people praying directly to
Jesus which fits with orthodox trinitarian view. nowadays only the fatehr is prayed to by mormons (although prayers are closed in jesus name) and the holy spirit is only invoked at baptism.
 
I believe that if you look at what abinadi says about God in the BoM (One God and his explanation for Jesus being called the son of God) and then add context by looking at the witnesses testimony in the beginning of the BoM (glory be the father, son, holy spirit, etc.) you can make a pretty strong case that Joseph and the early LDS started out Trinitarian. if you will read Lecture 5 of the Lectures on faith (used to be part of the D&C now the D&C intro still refers to it as “profitable” for teaching) you see a shift to a binitarian view (Two personages Father and Son, only son has a body and the holy spirit is their shared mind) it wasn’t until late JS/early BY that the LDS became henotheistic with a three Gods view of our world. The BoM shows people praying directly to
Jesus which fits with orthodox trinitarian view. nowadays only the fatehr is prayed to by mormons (although prayers are closed in jesus name) and the holy spirit is only invoked at baptism.
You believe what you want about my religion. I’ve told you what I believe, and have been taught to believe. I don’t need someone else to vouch for that.
 
Allweather, do you pray to God?
My point being, we pray to God, in the name of Jesus. I think we have very similar doctrine, and we agree with that of the Nicene crede which says,

“We believe in one God, the Father,
almighty, maker of all things visible and
invisible; And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the substance of the Father”.

When we pray to God in the name of Jesus, we are in essence praying to both at the same time. Jesus serves as our mediator, advocate with the Father, and it is through Him, that we get to the Father. They are one in purpose and mission, and Christ is the God of our world, therefore our prayers have to go through Him.
 
jstayii

my hubby and I have made friends with a mormon couple and we will be going to a event together. My background I think I said is Baptist mainly. But given the “difference” of perspective on the Trinity vrs Three (hope you get what Im meaning) I take it you believe all that Christ did, said, died and is in Heaven? Just Hes not part of God? They are separate. Is this a “nutshell” if I can say that? I dont want to offend these people, as to date I didnt know there was this difference. Do Momorons speak about Christ in their lives and Him guiding you? 😃

oh sure now I reread the post above and I think some of my answers are there, but is there anything to add?? Also she speaks of her son on mission for 2 yrs. Is that training to be a missionary, do all go or just some. Or is it just a one time thing.
 
Allweather, do you pray to God?
I do. To God, to Jesus. When I go to adoration, I am in the presence of Jesus and I pray to him directly. Of course, I don’t need to be in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament to pray to Jesus. I call on him constantly, many times every hour, throughout each day.
 
My point being, we pray to God, in the name of Jesus. I think we have very similar doctrine, and we agree with that of the Nicene crede which says,

“We believe in one God, the Father,
almighty, maker of all things visible and
invisible; And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the substance of the Father”.
What translation of the Nicene Creed is that? It is different from the one we know and say at Mass. For instance, yours says “the Son of God” while ours says “the only Son of God.” And yours says “begotten from the Father” while ours says “eternally begotten of the Father.” These seem like they could be significant differences, but I’m not an expert in these matters. I realize there are different ways to translate things from one language to another, so I’m just wondering what the source of your version is.
When we pray to God in the name of Jesus, we are in essence praying to both at the same time. Jesus serves as our mediator, advocate with the Father, and it is through Him, that we get to the Father. They are one in purpose and mission, and Christ is the God of our world, therefore our prayers have to go through Him.
But they are separate beings in your view, correct? They are separate, distinct beings, rather than distinct personalities of the same being, God. Christ is the “God of our world” and is the messenger of prayers to Heavenly Father who is somewhere else, and there are other worlds with their own gods, just like Christ is the god of our world. Do I have that about right?

I’m trying to get a handle on the Mormon godhead. It is very difficult for me to grasp.
 
I believe that if you look at what abinadi says about God in the BoM (One God and his explanation for Jesus being called the son of God) and then add context by looking at the witnesses testimony in the beginning of the BoM (glory be the father, son, holy spirit, etc.) you can make a pretty strong case that Joseph and the early LDS started out Trinitarian. if you will read Lecture 5 of the Lectures on faith (used to be part of the D&C now the D&C intro still refers to it as “profitable” for teaching) you see a shift to a binitarian view (Two personages Father and Son, only son has a body and the holy spirit is their shared mind) it wasn’t until late JS/early BY that the LDS became henotheistic with a three Gods view of our world. The BoM shows people praying directly to
Jesus which fits with orthodox trinitarian view. nowadays only the fatehr is prayed to by mormons (although prayers are closed in jesus name) and the holy spirit is only invoked at baptism.
That’s very good. Again, Majick, you show that you really know your stuff.
 
What translation of the Nicene Creed is that? It is different from the one we know and say at Mass. For instance, yours says “the Son of God” while ours says “the only Son of God.” And yours says “begotten from the Father” while ours says “eternally begotten of the Father.” These seem like they could be significant differences, but I’m not an expert in these matters. I realize there are different ways to translate things from one language to another, so I’m just wondering what the source of your version is.
There are many different versions and translations of the Nicene Creed. There is also the difference between the original Nicene Creed and the amended version of it by the Council of Constantinople, which is also called the Nicene Creed. This article in the Wikipedia does a good job of explaining the different versions:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed

The article that I had linked to earlier also gives good background information about the subject.
But they are separate beings in your view, correct? They are separate, distinct beings, rather than distinct personalities of the same being, God.
That is correct.
Christ is the “God of our world” and is the messenger of prayers to Heavenly Father who is somewhere else, and there are other worlds with their own gods, just like Christ is the god of our world. Do I have that about right?
No, you don’t get that right. First of all Christ is not just “the God of our world”. He is the God of all worlds; for all worlds were made by Him, and through him, and of Him, and for Him. Secondly, He is not the “messenger of prayers to Heavenly Father who is somewhere else”. That is Catholic doctrine, not Mormonism. In LDS theology, there is no such thing as someone being the “messenger of prayers” to someone else. When we pray to Heavenly Father, He is omnipotent and omniscient, and He hears our prayers. He doesn’t need a secretary else to “carry our prayers to Him”. That is the kind of thing that Catholics believe in, not LDS. And thirdly, there aren’t any other “worlds with their own gods”. As I told you before, Jesus is the creator of all worlds and the God of all worlds, and that is all that there is to it.
I’m trying to get a handle on the Mormon godhead. It is very difficult for me to grasp.
You got even that bit of it wrong. The Mormon Godhead is the easiest of all to “grasp”. It is the nonsensical absurdities of Trinitarianism that is difficult (in fact impossible) to “grasp”.

zerinus
 
So when one prays you can pray to Jesus

or you can pray to God

And only when someone is baptisted you pray to the Holy Spirit

Is this right?
 
jstayii

my hubby and I have made friends with a mormon couple and we will be going to a event together. My background I think I said is Baptist mainly. But given the “difference” of perspective on the Trinity vrs Three (hope you get what Im meaning) I take it you believe all that Christ did, said, died and is in Heaven? Just Hes not part of God? They are separate. Is this a “nutshell” if I can say that? I dont want to offend these people, as to date I didnt know there was this difference. Do Momorons speak about Christ in their lives and Him guiding you? 😃
Kitty Chan, I think you’ve about got it all right. I think if one were to really read some of the early creeds, you would find the Mormon Doctrines on the Godhead agree with many of them, in fact. We simply do not believe the Godhead to be one in digit form, as somehow modern-day Christianity has come to interpret. We also believe that God and Christ both have a divine, perfected, resurrected body. We get this because we believe a modern day Prophet (Joseph Smith), called of God, actually saw God the Father and Jesus Christ in the flesh, in modern times - it is because of this that Mormons tend to have a few more little (or big, however you feel about the significance of them) details about the Godhead. Feel free to ask your friends any questions you might have as well - I don’t think they would get offended by your questions. They will probably welcome them and be happy to answer them and discuss them with you.

Re: our belief in Christ, you have it correct. In the Book of Mormon it says, “And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins.” (2 Nephi 25:26) Mormons try to live to that standard. I hope what I have said here isn’t offensive to you either, Kitty Chan. 🙂
oh sure now I reread the post above and I think some of my answers are there, but is there anything to add?? Also she speaks of her son on mission for 2 yrs. Is that training to be a missionary, do all go or just some. Or is it just a one time thing.
All Young men in the Mormon church are encouraged to serve a 2 year mission. They usually go when they are 19 years of age, serve for 2 years, and the location is determined by the Prophet or an Apostle of the Lord. While there, they spend all their time, talents, and efforts preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ. That would also be a good topic to ask them about. A Mormon mother is usually proud of their son serving a mission, and usually loves to talk about it. 🙂
 
So when one prays you can pray to Jesus

or you can pray to God

And only when someone is baptisted you pray to the Holy Spirit

Is this right?
We pray to the Father, in the name of the Son in our individual, personal prayers and public prayers. We baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
 
40.png
zerinus:
No, you don’t get that right. First of all Christ is not just “the God of our world”. He is the God of all worlds; for all worlds were made by Him, and through him, and of Him, and for Him. Secondly, He is not the “messenger of prayers to Heavenly Father who is somewhere else”. That is Catholic doctrine, not Mormonism.
I don’t think that would be fair to say that that is Catholic doctrine. In fact, I didn’t mean to suggest that it is. If you believe that it is, then you’re mistaken. I’m trying to get a grasp of Mormon views of God. Apparently these are hard to pin down, because, as Majik has described earlier, the Mormon doctines have varied over time, and based on what others have written here, not all Mormons agree on this subject. You, Zerinus, seem to represent a very conservative point of view, while some others, like why me, are more liberal. I wonder if there aren’t variations in your respective understandings on the Mormon gods and their various functions.
In LDS theology, there is no such thing as someone being the “messenger of prayers” to someone else. When we pray to Heavenly Father, He is omnipotent and omniscient, and He hears our prayers. He doesn’t need a secretary else to “carry our prayers to Him”. That is the kind of thing that Catholics believe in, not LDS.
Again, that wouldn’t be Catholic doctrine at all, at least not the way I have been made to understand it. I was groping around for the particular Mormon doctrines, and suggesting my own admittedly incomplete and erroneous conceptions of them. I reckon we would agree that God “is omnipotent and omniscient”
and that He hears our prayers, and doesn’t need a “secretary ‘else carry our prayers to Him’” but Catholics don’t believe that, either, so if that’s your idea of Catholic doctrines then you are mistaken.
And thirdly, there aren’t any other “worlds with their own gods”. As I told you before, Jesus is the creator of all worlds and the God of all worlds, and that is all that there is to it.
Very well. While I’ve got you on line on this subject, could you clear up the matter of Kolob for me? What is Kolob? Where is it? Who, if anyone, lives there? What does it have to do with Mormonism?
You got even that bit of it wrong. The Mormon Godhead is the easiest of all to “grasp”. It is the nonsensical absurdities of Trinitarianism that is difficult (in fact impossible) to “grasp”.zerinus
I won’t disagree with you on that! The Mormon ideas about God are utterly simple, in fact, childishly so, if your statements here are to be believed as representative of Mormon doctrines, which I’m not at all sure they are. Unfortunately for Mormons, they are largely wrong, but that is another subject for another thread.
 
Kitty Chan, I think you’ve about got it all right. I think if one were to really read some of the early creeds, you would find the Mormon Doctrines on the Godhead agree with many of them, in fact. We simply do not believe the Godhead to be one in digit form, as somehow modern-day Christianity has come to interpret. We also believe that God and Christ both have a divine, perfected, resurrected body. We get this because we believe a modern day Prophet (Joseph Smith), called of God, actually saw God the Father and Jesus Christ in the flesh, in modern times -
Well, at least its cleared up basically in my head regarding the Trinity or the Three (is there a way you refer to them) And what you think of Jesus. Id rather have a explaination than speculation.

Have to leave Joseph Smith with my jury thinking about things and eating take out. Cant wrap my mind around him at the moment. You are not offensive at all. I know more how to talk to these friends, you know what with being Canadian and all eh? Must be polite 😃 I just didnt want to start a religious war in a crowd lol to tell you the truth we will probably be having fun to worry about too much.

And good observation about her son, shes mentioned him several times already, I can see shes a proud momma. Are those a one time deal for 2 yrs or can they go into full time missionary? A girl in my office went to Thailand for missionary and said there were Morman missionaries there too. I have a feeling it was a popular place for all missionaries.
 
We pray to the Father, in the name of the Son in our individual, personal prayers and public prayers. We baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
Do you baptize babies like catholics?
 
And good observation about her son, shes mentioned him several times already, I can see shes a proud momma. Are those a one time deal for 2 yrs or can they go into full time missionary? A girl in my office went to Thailand for missionary and said there were Morman missionaries there too. I have a feeling it was a popular place for all missionaries.
Small world - I was a full-time missionary in Thailand too. I wonder if I knew her. I was there from 1996 to 1998. Yes, it’s a one time deal for 2 years. Once you’re older and kids have left the house, etc., you can choose to go again with your spouse though for another couple years - it’s not a lifetime thing though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top