P
pro_universal
Guest
The propaganda of a bunch of terrorist groups is not a good exemplar of a whole religion. Neither are the columns of a governmnet paper in a brutal dictatorship. That’s all that you posted from either source, MEMRI or Jihadwatch.Please prove - no, let’s make it easier for you - please show good reason how these are not examples of Muslim hatred of those for whom the hatred is expressed.
There are undoubtedly radicals in the muslim world who use religion to spew their hatred…but there are those in the Christian world too, the KKK and other nazi organizations being first among them. I don’t believe you think the existence of those groups justifies labelling all Christianity “evil and racist”…if not, why then does the existence of radical groups in Islam justify labelling that religion evil?
You missed my point. These examples of extremism are, just as the Catholic-Protestant violence was, examples of politics taking religion on as a mask. This is not a problem unique to any religion, and it has nothing to do with religion at base. That was why I brought up Israel…the conflict is about nationhood and arabs, and just as radical Israelis and westerners have demonized all of muslm history, so radical muslims have done the same in reverse. That doesn’t change the fact that the conflict and hatred turns on political power, not on religious teaching at its core.Maybe the BBC invented all those placards calling for the extermination of others. Maybe the Shoah-deniers in the Muslim world are correct, and those horrid Jews made the whole thing up. Maybe the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem never webt to Berlin, let alone consulted with Hitler on how to exterminate the Jews
meforum.org/article/14
The fact that before 1948, the only place in the world where Jews were not consistently persecuted and where they were protected, was the Muslim world. The Emir of Morocco specifically protected jews in his kingdom when the Germans were there. Even today, if you look at the constitution of Iran (yes, the insane religious radical governmetn of Iran), religious freedom for Jews is written into it. See Article 13 of the Iranian constitution.
Likewise, what were the British and French doing in the middle east in 1920? How did the people of South America end up speaking Spanish? How about North America…how’d they end up speaking english? I don’t see how the fact that there have been imperialists in Islam and expansion matters to this debate one bit.I suppose it’s possible that those afraid of Islam in the 16th century were hallucinating when the Muslim advance into Europe after 1453 took place - or rather, didn’t.
I’d like to know what exactly doesn’t make sense to you about the idea that politics might be a factor in the current violence more than religion. That’s where Jihadwatch and MEMRI go wrong, and that’s why it’s better to study history and look at sources that provide citations (like the one above) for your info. Relying on a religious studies ma’s blog for this is tantamount to relying on the advice of a psychologist for engineering questions.