“If she destroys the frozen embryos isn’t that killing human lives? Wouldn’t she have an obligation to make sure those embryos are born? Do two wrongs make a right?”
I’m not sure there is an obligation to do a transfer of the remaining embryos, but it certainly does not improve the situationo abandon the frozen embryos, and destroying them or “donating them to science” is totally out of the question.
The sin is in the initial manufacturing process, not the transfer. (Moral theologians, correct me if I’m wrong.) That may ease the OP’s mind.
Am I right in thinking that they can licitly either:
- leave the embryos safely frozen
- transfer the embryos