B
Blue_Horizon
Guest
OK, how so?Thank you,
I do understand the construction, I just find it flawed.
OK, how so?Thank you,
I do understand the construction, I just find it flawed.
The ends do often justify the means. Otherwise war would always be considered evil.Greetings CAF!
I understand that the ends do not justify the means, like you can’t kill and torture someone to save the world. But one thing that has never been explained to me concerning this expression is why? Why don’t the ends justify the means?
I can’t really make sense of it. I agree with it, but it’s like I’m agreeing with something that I don’t even have any knowledge of.
Could anyone clear up my dilemma?
Thanks,
Facite
Why not open the shutters … lets talk about misleading Germans to save Jews. Lying is but one way of misleading - there are other ways that are acceptableI’m not a theologian but in a class on Catholic belief that I once took this was discussed at some length. Someone brought up an example of lying to the authorities in Nazi Germany to protect Jewish victims. We were told that lying is lying and that we must not assume that we–rather than God–are in charge of a situation. Another way of saying it is that God told us not to lie. He didn’t add the word “unless” at the end of the statement. I admit that there are situations when it is hard to accept that the absolute truth is more beneficial than a lie. However, if we trust in God then we must not be so full of pride that we decide that what we think is greater than what God knows. To me, telling the absolute truth is one of the most difficult things that we are asked to do in this life. (sigh…)
I would tell a thousand lies to save an innocent life, and would consider myself to be doing it out of love for the jew. I am outraged that you care more about telling the truth to evil people than saving human lives. And what are these ‘other means’ of misleading? Besides, if it’s misleading, then it’s basically lying.Why not open the shutters … lets talk about misleading Germans to save Jews. Lying is but one way of misleading - there are other ways that are acceptable![]()
Wow, did I say that did I?I am outraged that you care more about telling the truth to evil people than saving human lives.
I’m only telling you what I was told–that a lie is a lie. Frankly, I’d like to think that if I had lived in Hitler’s time in Germany that I would have been brave enough to protect Jewish families. I understand being afraid–but still, I hope that I would help them. :bounce:I would tell a thousand lies to save an innocent life, and would consider myself to be doing it out of love for the jew. I am outraged that you care more about telling the truth to evil people than saving human lives. And what are these ‘other means’ of misleading? Besides, if it’s misleading, then it’s basically lying.
Also, for Roscoe Turner, I have a question. Suppose you were a doctor and you had five patients that need essential organ transplants quickly, and the only way you can get them the organs they need is to take those of another patient (the five patients all need different organs, so you could save them all by killing just this one person). What would you do in this situation?
I’m only telling you what I was told–that a lie is a lie. Frankly, I’d like to think that if I had lived in Hitler’s time in Germany that I would have been brave enough to protect Jewish families.:bounce: I understand being afraid–but still, I hope that I would help them.I would tell a thousand lies to save an innocent life, and would consider myself to be doing it out of love for the jew. I am outraged that you care more about telling the truth to evil people than saving human lives. And what are these ‘other means’ of misleading? Besides, if it’s misleading, then it’s basically lying.
Also, for Roscoe Turner, I have a question. Suppose you were a doctor and you had five patients that need essential organ transplants quickly, and the only way you can get them the organs they need is to take those of another patient (the five patients all need different organs, so you could save them all by killing just this one person). What would you do in this situation?
There are fathers and babies on both sides of a war. Both are defending their families.Giving examples of unjust war – is well doing just that. One is not to “bomb babies” one is to protect babies.
Such has nothing to do with understanding just war except that one sees examples of unjust war. So one knows what a just war is not.
I refer you and all reader to the what the Church teaches about a just war. And it is NOT that war is something to engage in like say going to the movies or going out for a dinner. It something that should over all be avoided. But in this world that is fallen -where evil men kill whole races of people and attack your country to murder your children and wives and those of your neighbor -there yes can be a just war (taking into account again all that defines such).
Jesus expects Fathers to defend their children from murderer.
(I will leave you for now-it does not seem to go anywhere – – again time is limited–may pleasant dreams be had by all.)
NoAlso, for Roscoe Turner, I have a question. Suppose you were a doctor and you had five patients that need essential organ transplants quickly, and the only way you can get them the organs they need is to take those of another patient (the five patients all need different organs, so you could save them all by killing just this one person). What would you do in this situation?

Some hints:If the ends never justify the means, then why send our soldiers out to war in the name of goodness for the people who are dying at the hands of an evil government? Why have countless wars been fought in the name of Christ?
Roscoe,There are fathers and babies on both sides of a war. Both are defending their families.
Can you give an example of a just war? Or is this something fanciful that has no real relevance to our lives.
I am very familiar with the wars of the Old Testament - I don’ think they pass the smell test for a just war either.Roscoe,
Read the old testament. Full of wars, and many directly sanctioned by God for the Israelites to fight.
Here is one quote from Nehemiah directly advocating self defense.
Nehemiah 4: 13
Therefore I stationed some of the people behind the lowest points of the wall at the exposed places, posting them by families, with their swords, spears and bows. 14 After I looked things over, I stood up and said to the nobles, the officials and the rest of the people, “Don’t be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your families, your sons and your daughters, your wives and your homes.”
The bible teaches that it is acceptable to fight for our families, sons and daughters, wives and homes. Please give up your unfounded notion that self defense is unbiblical.
As for just wars in modern times, I will agree that many modern wars should not have been fought. But are you going to mount an argument that the allies in WWII should not have fought the Nazis?
Deuteronomy7:16[34] And we took all his cities at that time, killing the inhabitants of them, men and women and children. We left nothing of them: [35] Except the cattle which came to the share of them that took them: and the spoils of the cities, which we took:
Joshua 6:21[16] Thou shalt consume all the people, which the Lord thy God will deliver to thee. Thy eye shall not spare them, neither shalt thou serve their gods, lest they be thy ruin.
Doesn’t sound like[21] And killed all that were in it, man and woman, young and old. The oxen also and the sheep, and the asses, they slew with the edge of the sword.
34 A new commandment I give unto you: That you love one another, as I have loved you, that you also love one another.
Well, you’ll have to take that issue up with God when you meet Him.I am very familiar with the wars of the Old Testament - I don’ think they pass the smell test for a just war either.
“Gott Mit Uns” The Nazi’s thought God was on their side as well.Well, you’ll have to take that issue up with God when you meet Him.
But in the meatime you can answer my question above: are you going to mount an argument that the allies in WWII should not have fought the Nazis?
That’s not an answer.“Gott Mit Uns” The Nazi’s thought God was on their side as well.
The Church’s stance was neutrality.That’s not an answer.
Please answer my question.