Can the Latin mass speak to all?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PastorBonus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PastorBonus

Guest
I am a fan of the Latin mass and would love to see it celebrated more universally. However one thing that bugs me when the Latin issue creep in is whether or not it can speak to every culture. Latin is a deeply European language and the Latin mass itself is very European. Can the Latin mass then speak to people in other countries in Africa and Asia?
 
Do people reckon Latin as “European?” In a sense it is, but I am not sure that is what immediately comes to mind.
 
Why not? It seems to have done in years past, else there would be a Ste Rose of Lima or S Martin de Pores or Ignatius Cardinal Kung Pin-Mei or … well, there are plenty more. 🙂
 
English is the lingua franca now.

Latin had its few hundred years.
 
Can the Latin mass then speak to people in other countries in Africa and Asia?
Yes and before the changes this was the Mass they would have had. The TLM has blessed many generations across an eon.
 
Latin was around in Asia and Africa as well. The only place it wouldn’t make sense to use is the Americas, but it did quite well here!

There is a great wisdom in the Church having its own language, and having a common language for a common Mass an unparalleled sign of unity.
 
This is not an EF issue. The OF should also retain Latin in the liturgy, as mandated in Vatican II.
 
I am a fan of the Latin mass and would love to see it celebrated more universally. However one thing that bugs me when the Latin issue creep in is whether or not it can speak to every culture. Latin is a deeply European language and the Latin mass itself is very European. Can the Latin mass then speak to people in other countries in Africa and Asia?
It can, but the key word is “can.” I tend to think that anyone can get a lot out of the Latin Mass (or the Mass in any language that is not their own) if they are willing and able to put in the time required to understand and process what all the things are.

But I also think the Mass in other versions can, and can more easily for people who are not already aware of the intricacies of the Latin Mass. For example, I see a lot of meaning in the (sometimes subtle, sometimes not so subtle) newer more correct translation of OF Mass into English, and there is no way I’d get that in the Latin.

The Latin Mass is extremely beautiful, and when I’ve attended it (as a person who is not used to it) I marveled at the beauty of this liturgy that I personally could not understand at all. It is my opinion (and no more than my opinion) that a sort of ideal situation would be to restore some of the beauty that the EF has to the OF while keeping the OF Mass in the vernacular so that the shades of meaning will be more easily accessible.

But yes. It absolutely can. And each person could work so that it did. But I (personally) think that a Mass in the vernacular speaks more easily.
 
I love the latin mass! Initially when my family was planning to convert from Protestantism, we went to the Novus Ordo mass for a few months. We learned about a traditional latin mass parish in our city when we were wondering where to do our RCIA. I thought maybe the traditional mass would be too much change from what I was used to as a Protestant, and that I would be more “comfortable” with the new mass. But it didn’t take me long to get used to the latin. Now, especially when I go to mass anywhere else, I wonder if I would have “made it” in the ordinary form. I doubt I and my family would be thriving as Catholics if we attended the OF mass. I thank God every day for His guidance; being a part of my parish has been an incalculable grace to me!
 
I am a fan of the Latin mass and would love to see it celebrated more universally. However one thing that bugs me when the Latin issue creep in is whether or not it can speak to every culture.
Should the Mass in Latin speak to every culture? Pope Saint Gregory the Great said to Saint Augustine of Canterbury concerning (introducing) liturgical customs in England, “let the minds of the English grow accustomed to it”. And they did. Our liturgy is sacred. So, let the culture adapt to the Latin liturgy, and not the other way around.
Latin is a deeply European language and the Latin mass itself is very European.
The Latin liturgy was common in Roman Africa long before it was common in Rome. We probably have Pope Saint Victor I, an African, to thank for the use of Latin in the liturgy in Rome. Latin was the language of the Roman Empire which stretched far beyond Europe. It is a fitting language for the Roman Church.
Can the Latin mass then speak to people in other countries in Africa and Asia?
The question should be, can the minds of the people grow accustomed to the Latin Mass? I believe they can.
 
I am a fan of the Latin mass and would love to see it celebrated more universally. However one thing that bugs me when the Latin issue creep in is whether or not it can speak to every culture. Latin is a deeply European language and the Latin mass itself is very European. Can the Latin mass then speak to people in other countries in Africa and Asia?
I really don’t think that Latin in particular is the issue. I think that any person can come to the understanding that the language being used is sacred, and therefore is supposed to be different than ordinary language. For example, Ge’ez is the language used by the Ethiopian Orthodox/Ethiopian Catholic churches. Though it may be their traditional language, it has been dead for centuries; nobody actually speaks it.

However, I think that the question should be–do the rituals and forms of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as it is speak to all cultures? Not sure if it’s heresy, but I’m going to go out and say “no.”
 
This is not an EF issue. The OF should also retain Latin in the liturgy, as mandated in Vatican II.
I once asked a lady at a bus stop where parishes were that had good Masses. She named a few, giving their locations. Of one she said that they do some latin there, which she guessed was ok, but, she said, “To me, that is going backwards.” I just looked at her like she had just spoken in a foreign language. I found it interesting that she did not mention the FSSP parish that was only a few blocks away.
 
This is not an EF issue. The OF should also retain Latin in the liturgy, as mandated in Vatican II.
Disagree. Performing the liturgy in the vernacular is and can be an enormous blessing to Catholic worship. Ask yourself this: is it more important that, as an American, I could go into a church in rural Nigeria and understand the liturgy word for word, or is it more important that anyone anywhere, Catholic or not, could go to mass and understand what was happening?

I would say, unquestionably, the latter. A person’s own language has a capacity to speak to them and to influence them in a way that something foreign does not.

Stick with the vernacular. By all means, adapt a more reverent liturgy (I’m unsatisfied with both EF and OF)…but keep the vernacular. The only reason we use Latin is because it was the dominant language spoken at the time the church was founded. If Christ were living and dying and charging in these times, and St. Peter was founding the church in these times, applying the same standard as we did with Latin, then everything would be in English.
 
Latin is awesome!!

I wish they kept it in the Novus Ordo even. I love the EF and NO. I feel that Latin makes for a more mystical expierence.
 
Interesting question. It makes sense that the Latin language would sound more “foreign” to Asians than to Western Europeans, since the sounds that make up their languages are very different than ours. Is that a bad thing? I don’t think so, because one of the benefits of a “dead” liturgical language is that it lends to the liturgy a sense of mystery and transcendence. The Latin might be a little harder for Asian priests to learn and pronounce (just as it would be hard for English-speaking priests to learn an ancient Chinese dialect); but they have been doing this for some time now, as far as I know successfully. As to the ceremonial, people don’t generally know what all the symbolism of the Mass (of whatever missal) means anyway, until you explain it to them. And what it conveys also has to be explained. In short, whatever liturgy you use, people will have to be catechized as to its meaning.
 
Latin is awesome!!

I wish they kept it in the Novus Ordo even. I love the EF and NO. I feel that Latin makes for a more mystical expierence.
The mystery of the mass should be found in what is actually taking place - the transformation of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. I point out again, when the mass started, Latin WAS the vernacular. We shouldn’t need to cloak the mass in incomprehensible (to most people) linguistics in order to make it reverent. We need a faith and a worship that can reach directly out to people and pull them in and give a clear relation to modern life. We need people to leave the mass seeing directly how it connects to them, and why they need to come back next week.

One of the areas we’re being absolutely clobbered by Protestants is in how connected people feel to the service. Going back to mandated Latin isn’t going to help. Yes, I like the EF. But I would love the EF if it were in English.

A reverent, audible, comprehensible liturgy is what we need.
 
The mystery of the mass should be found in what is actually taking place - the transformation of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. I point out again, when the mass started, Latin WAS the vernacular. We shouldn’t need to cloak the mass in incomprehensible (to most people) linguistics in order to make it reverent. We need a faith and a worship that can reach directly out to people and pull them in and give a clear relation to modern life. We need people to leave the mass seeing directly how it connects to them, and why they need to come back next week.

One of the areas we’re being absolutely clobbered by Protestants is in how connected people feel to the service. Going back to mandated Latin isn’t going to help. Yes, I like the EF. But I would love the EF if it were in English.

A reverent, audible, comprehensible liturgy is what we need.
And, is there no point to be made that the Latin liturgy was largely incomprehensible to most people for over 1000 years?

I am not saying that there is nothing to be gained by vernacular. That would be silly. But the Church did get along just fine for a very long time with a liturgy that was mostly not understood aurally by the people.

I mean, really. If I could have a Latin ordinary every Sunday, I’d be in paradise. I’d shut up forever! =p
 
The mystery of the mass should be found in what is actually taking place - the transformation of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. I point out again, when the mass started, Latin WAS the vernacular. We shouldn’t need to cloak the mass in incomprehensible (to most people) linguistics in order to make it reverent. We need a faith and a worship that can reach directly out to people and pull them in and give a clear relation to modern life. We need people to leave the mass seeing directly how it connects to them, and why they need to come back next week.

One of the areas we’re being absolutely clobbered by Protestants is in how connected people feel to the service. Going back to mandated Latin isn’t going to help. Yes, I like the EF. But I would love the EF if it were in English.

A reverent, audible, comprehensible liturgy is what we need.
I agree. The trend back toward Latin was part of the reaction to all the liturgical abuses that were happening but wrongly blamed, IMO, on the vernacular. Granted, the vernacular facilitated some of the looseness. So did the faulty translation and the foot-dragging to correct it. If I can’t understand the Latin, how would I know if the words being used are correct or not anyway? Hearing the vernacular permits hearing it incorrectly and opens the door to correction of abuses. It may take awhile and it did take awhile. If the abuses were in Latin, I wouldn’t know. And what I don’t know wouldn’t hurt me. I think it’s better for more people to be able to understand. I realize some people love Latin and it’s good if there is some accomodation for that. I also realize some people understand Latin and it is very beautiful also. My dad understood it and loved it.
 
40.png
YoungTradCath:
I mean, really. If I could have a Latin ordinary every Sunday, I’d be in paradise. I’d shut up forever! =p
I agree! And if I didn’t need to go to work to make a living, I would be there faithfully every single morning, every day of the year. This to me would be heaven.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top