Candace Owens: Democrats want black people to fail

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because of the peer pressure they will more than likey never take the initiative to do any research. For many people it is easier to sit
down in front of the tv and let CNN or MSNBC or NBC tell you what to think and what you are to be outraged about. Aren’t they the nanny stations who are supposed to be looking out for their viewers?
 
Convert3 said:
Not correct. Global poverty is declining.
Click to expand...
I would suggest a complete reading of your report. Any decline in poverty is the result of implemented programs specifically aimed at the poor in relation to health, housing, and sustainable methods towards access to food, add education to this list.

Your suggestion that “trickle down” economics is the reason for declines in poverty over a specified period of time is faulty. It is due to implemented programs aimed at the poor! IF you are suggesting that trickle down brought the economic growth enabling a rise in the decrease in poverty you would need to prove that economic growth has been steady, and it has not. A decrease in poverty doesn’t happen overnight. Think about it. Economic growth that is dependent on trickle down would need to be a reliable consistent factor and it never will be.

Any decline is the direct result of implemented programs specifically designed for the poor at the bottom, not subject to reliance to those at the “top” which is inconsistent.

Bottoms up!~
 
Last edited:
No, decreasing in poverty doesn’t happen overnight. But it likely wouldn’t happen at all without capitalism bringing jobs and opportunities to the people who need them. Government can help, but often gets in the way. Government couldn’t do anything without those who make money paying taxes. Charities are much more efficient and effective at helping those in need.
 
But capitalism cannot survive without purchasing power brought to you by the consumer.

A consumer cannot buy the wares of the capitalist if they’re poor, and furthermore a decline over a long period of time as you suggest would need to demonstrate that economic growth didn’t waver!..Look at the stock market…it wavers.

That is what “out of poverty” means. It’s not reliant on a source that may or may not trickle down like a slave reliant on a master. Because of programs (yes, brought to you by your federal government) the person at the bottom can be reliant on themselves because of education and the tools that makes them employable.
 
The Democratic Party is still the party of slavery. The only difference is that they are restricted to enslaving people mentally. Look at how they treat any black man who is conservative or republican. They automatically brand him as an Uncle Tom. They want to own people intellectually and psychologically.
 
Being reliant on the government does not bring prosperity. Nothing has been more beneficial to raising people out of poverty than capitalism. Government spending is very inefficient and with all the money the US has poured into fighting poverty since Johnson’s War on Poverty, the results were poor. Creating jobs and wealth have done more. The Federal government did not raise people around the world out of poverty. Corruption has kept people around the world in poverty. Countries that have opened up to capitalism are the ones thriving and bringing their people out of poverty.
 
Convert3 said:
Being reliant on the government does not bring prosperity.
Click to expand...
My critique had nothing to do with “reliance” on government…nor “reliance” on a trickle down economics bringing a person out of poverty.

My claim is that programs including but not limited to health, education, vocational training, and the means of sustainable nutrition in 3rd world countries is what lifts persons out of poverty.

These things in turn are the means to freedom and non-reliant on what may or may not trickle down in any given time frame over the course of a persons life. They are employable and have health that allows them to provide for themselves and even enjoy life…they have a trade or vocation…they can move on if the corp. goes belly up, or they can move on and up if offered more money!~

The means to freedom and self reliance comes from within, not from what trickles down from the wealth of someone else.

Besides, as Pope Francis says…with trickle down instead of the wealth trickling down from the excesses, the glass gets magically bigger at the top.
 
Convert3 said:
Nothing has been more beneficial to raising people out of poverty than capitalism.
Click to expand...
This deserves a topic of it’s own.

As Chesterton says: The problem isn’t too much capitalism, the problem is too few capitalists!~

Education, health, a vocation, ones property even if owning the tools of the skills of ones trade is what rises persons out of poverty.

Vulture and crony capitalism have a bad name and rightly so, and due to this fact regulations impede shady practices. Like a referee they make fair the playing field. Again, rightly so.

Capitalism within a framework of regulated fair practice is Catholic teaching…unbridled capitalism is not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top