D
Dusenberg
Guest
Not true. The mortality rate for the indigenous definitely rose during the Mission Period. It certainly wasn’t intentional or due to torture. It was largely due to disease and closer confinement (which precipitated the spread.) There was no widespread slaughter of natives by Yankees in Alta California.Thank you!
I think I posted this here but, if not, it’s on my blog.
Haters of Father Serra and the church make claims they were responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Indians.
The first mission was founded in 1769 and they were started to be taken away from the church in 1-]9/-]835. That is a period of 76 years! Those natives who died during that time were no more than what would have died of their own diseases, droughts, locust swarms, and hunger. And, if falling ill, had nobody to treat them back to help.
The truth be none, more natives were forced into serfdom after secularization where they were forced to work in rags and meager rations by those swearing allegiance to the newly independent Mexico.
Then came the Yankees! The slaughter was horrible - and unreported then and now. The current Indian reservations throughout California are the result of American government.
So, when detractors do their best to denigrate Reverend Father Serra, tell them to read the unbiased history and get it straight.
Serra’s detractors however infer that had the Church and Serra not come in 1769, that nothing would have changed and their Shangri-la (not that it really was) would have continued.
That’s simply not the case. Secular interests would have eventually annihilated the natives and their culture beginning in the 1820’s. It would have been ALL OVER for them by statehood in 1850. There wouldn’t be anything or anyone left of the native peoples at all today had it not been for Serra and the Church.