L
lucybeebee
Guest
When did the OF start using cantors? What is the purpose of this role?
The only place that we need a cantor is for the Psalm & Gospel Acclamation. Nowhere does it call for someone to ‘lead’ the singing. The choir should be able to do that quite nicely without someone waving their arms at the people.When did the OF start using cantors? What is the purpose of this role?
At the three churches where I have served as cantor, the Psalm and Gospel Acclamation were the only things we did with the arm-waving, as you call it. The cantor would sing into the microphone for the hymns if the choir wasn’t present (they only sang for the “big” Mass on Sunday morning), but there were no gestures toward the congregation for hymns or for the Mass parts. Maybe it’s different where you are. Anyway, at the 7:30 a.m. Mass, those people did not sing (maybe they weren’t awake yet?) – if I hadn’t sung into the microphone, it would have been just the piano/organ. I used to call that Mass “Carrie’s solo recital hour.”The only place that we need a cantor is for the Psalm & Gospel Acclamation. Nowhere does it call for someone to ‘lead’ the singing. The choir should be able to do that quite nicely without someone waving their arms at the people.
If I remember correctly, right around 1970. I can remember when my parish first used them and thinking to myself “Who is this guy?”. There were no female cantors back then. The cantor’s primary purpose was, as was pointed out, to proclaim the Psalm and the Gospel Acclamation either singing or speaking depending upon if it was a sung Mass or not.When did the OF start using cantors? What is the purpose of this role?
If you played the piano for Mass, you would very quickly realize the purpose of a cantor.But what’s the purpose of a cantor? To my knowledge there was no such position prior to 1969 or so? Why was this believed to be needed?
Half the time they don’t sing even when they DO have a cantor!Simply put, when there is no cantor, the people don’t sing
How many Sunday Masses do you have at your parish? Mine has five. We don’t have five choirs, nor is it fair to expect the choir to show up at all five to keep a handful of people happy. Thus, the use of cantors. sighBut why do the people need to be singing in the first place? Couldn’t the choir do that instead?![]()
Having a choir is a recourse intensive ministry. It is hard to get people to first go out for it, practice for it, and sing as often as possible. Choir members are volunteers with lives too. Having cantors allows the choir members to not be burned out and to have better performances when they are scheduled (usually Christmas, Easter, Confirmation, etc…).But why do the people need to be singing in the first place? Couldn’t the choir do that instead?![]()
I can’t imagine worshipping God without singing.But why do the people need to be singing in the first place? Couldn’t the choir do that instead?![]()
Except for the post-Communion hymn, the hymns can all be sung by the choir alone. So too the Gloria & the Psalm if it is sung straight through by the psalmist without a response.I can’t imagine worshipping God without singing.
I believe that the various documents outlining the rubrics of the Mass call for singing by the congregation whenever possible. It is right to give praise to the Lord our God and use the voices that He has given us (even when those voices sound like frogs and katydids!).
Yes and no. It depends on the parish. In my small, country, farming parish, they never had a cantor and just little organ. At one point they didn’t even have an organist or any other musician. They don’t even have an amplification system installed. It’s all natural sound. During all the years I have attended mass, no matter what time of the year, the congregation sang their hearts out.The congregation is not going to sing without a cantor.
The 5 March 1967 Instruction Musicam sacram had:But what’s the purpose of a cantor? To my knowledge there was no such position prior to 1969 or so? Why was this believed to be needed?
Unfortunately, many of the cantors I’ve come accross at various parishes have had little or no vocal training and not even any real instruction on how to be a cantor. In my opinion, if the Church really wants to give true importance to the role of the cantor, She needs to take Her quote seriously.The 5 March 1967 Instruction Musicam sacram had:
“21. Especially where even a small choir is not possible, there must be at least one or more cantors, **thoroughly trained to intone at least the simpler chants that the congregation sings and to lead and sustain the singing.**Even in churches having a choir it is better for a cantor to be present for those celebrations that the choir cannot attend but that should be carried out with some degree of solemnity and thus with singing.”
In most places this is true. Where I come from, though, you still occasionally find older folk who won’t sing with a cantor. I’m struggling to put it into words but for some congregations well-used to singing hymns they knew and loved, the cantor when introduced seemed like a fifth wheel. (To address the OP, my first hazy memories of cantors at the OF are from about 1972.) They’d been singing all their lives without being led, and so they concluded that when the cantor sang this must be a new, extra thing to which they were supposed to just listen. My father reacted that way, even to choirs. It was counter-cultural for some of his generation, especially as Catholicism was traditionally “the religion of the scullery” and many parishes were made up of dirt-poor blue-collar families - no spare pennies to spend on music when you have more children than pairs of shoes for them. One of my Anglican organist friends found this too when he got a post at a big inner-city Catholic church - the days his cantor couldn’t be there, everyone sang and if the cantor led them, they went quiet. So he doesn’t use one anymore except for the psalm. Fewer and fewer places are like that, as time goes by, though.Cat is absolutely correct. The congregation is not going to sing without a cantor.