CARAVAN heading to The U.S.A ( POLL )

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seagull
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Salmonslayer said:
Besides, given that they were Protestants from England they were all heretics anyway, so their supposed Christianity is dubious to start.
Click to expand...
We don’t call Protestants heretics . You are in direct conflict with the Catholic Church if you do
 
The church does not regard Protestants as heretics anymore. The church also does not regard Jews as treacherous anymore.
The Church has held positions over the centuries that it does not, today.
We have the Holy Spirit to guide us.
Read a few more current Vatican documents.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_...ecree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html

Also look into the work of the travelling Pope. The man who is now a saint.

Stay away from dubious internet web sites.
 
Last edited:
Good advice, especially for those new in the faith whose spiritual formation isn’t that well formed or informed.

They could be led astray.
 
Sorry about that, I adjusted the link, try it now

Protestants are one group of our seperated brethren. That’s what we call them, not heretics.
 
Last edited:
Please stop calling Protestants heretics. You are in direct confrontation with Catholic Church teaching. And it is very uncharitable.

Stop the word play.

You might want to look at documents concerning the recent commemoration of the reformation too. Don Ruggero has posted about it.
 
Last edited:
A last name would have helped. 🙂

Nobody on CAF is qualified to determine whether or not these asylees are “worthy” of entry.
 
blackforest said:
A last name would have helped. 🙂

Nobody on CAF is qualified to determine whether or not these asylees are “worthy” of entry.
Click to expand...
This isn’t about asylum, nor is it about immigration. It is about a joint globalist/UN plan to normalize mass migration in order to erode national boundaries and sovereignty.

This “asylum” ruse is to emotionalize the issue to garner widespread support from those who, if they knew the ultimate end objectives, would never agree to the program.

It is about the wealthy super-oligarchs having open pathways to more power and wealth.
 
blackforest said:
A last name would have helped. 🙂

Nobody on CAF is qualified to determine whether or not these asylees are “worthy” of entry.
Click to expand...
The fact that these individuals have gone to a location other than a designated port of entry appears to disqualify them as legitimate asylees, and subjects those responsible for transporting these individuals to a fine of $3000 each.

(a) It shall be the duty of every person, including the owners, masters, officers, and agents of vessels, aircraft, transportation lines, or international bridges or toll roads, other than transportation lines which may enter into a contract as provided in section 238 , bringing an alien to, or providing a means for an alien to come to, the United States (including an alien crewman whose case is not covered by section 254(a) ) to prevent the landing of such alien in the United States at a port of entry other than as designated by the Attorney General or at any time or place other than as designated by the immigration officers.

Any such person, owner, master, officer, or agent who fails to comply with the foregoing requirements shall be liable to a penalty to be imposed by the Attorney General of $3,000 for each such violation,…

https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-8331.html#0-0-0-316
 
I wanted to edit my post to cancel the link but i cannot edit it because the forum says that i have exceeded the maximum number of edits and i have to wait 16 hours… 😦
If a moderator deems it inappropriate despite my warning (which is why i wanted to cancel it, i shouldn’t have posted it in the first place) then please edit the post.
 
When the Democrats put as much energy into getting the interpreters and others who helped during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq over here, maybe I will then listen to them about letting vast numbers of unvetted migrants, refugees, and/or asylum-claimers in.

Doesn’t having a rule that all anyone who enters illegally has to do when caught to be able to stay is to claim asylum strike anyone as odd?
 
HarryStotle said:
This isn’t about asylum, nor is it about immigration. It is about a joint globalist/UN plan to normalize mass migration in order to erode national boundaries and sovereignty.
Click to expand...
No. It’s about seeking asylum. Not a vast conspiracy theory.
Annie said:
When the Democrats put as much energy into getting the interpreters and others who helped during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq over here, maybe I will then listen to them about letting vast numbers of unvetted migrants, refugees, and/or asylum-claimers in.
Click to expand...
A good number of them already do come over here on a special visa. I’ve worked with them personally in my parish’s refugee ministry. Are there some being denied admission?

The asylees currently arriving from Central America are only unvetted until government officials vet them.

So far, they’re staying in shelters in Tijuana. Has anyone other than Breitbart claimed that they’ve “entered illegally?”
 
Last edited:
blackforest said:
A good number of them already do come over here on a special visa. I’ve worked with them personally in my parish’s refugee ministry. Are there some being denied admission?
Click to expand...
Apparently only 3,200 of an estimated 40-50,000 have been able to get the SIV, according to this 2016 article
blackforest said:
The asylees currently arriving from Central America are only unvetted until government officials vet them.
Click to expand...
Since I referenced the law, I thought it was clear that I was talking about the legal situation in general rather than the particular situation of those in the caravan.
 
Last edited:
Annie said:
Apparently only 3,200 of an estimated 40-50,000 have been able to get the SIV, according to this 2016 article
Click to expand...
Ugh. Unfortunately, these hurdles routinely plague refugees and asylees. I’ve met families who had officials demand marriage licenses and other documents from cultures that don’t even issue them.

It’s not a partisan issue but a bureaucratic one, although yes, it would be wonderful to see some bipartisan reform take place.
Annie said:
Since I referenced the law, I thought it was clear that I was talking about the legal situation in general rather than the particular situation of those in the caravan.
Click to expand...
It was unclear, given the specific topic of the thread, but thank you for clarifying. Speaking generally, I prefer allowing people to apply for asylum regardless of where they enter. Trump recently passed a law, however, requiring specific ports of entry. This will inevitably overwhelm our already broken immigration system.
 
People from Honduras have to apply to Mexico [not the USA].

Fill out the paperwork, get the medical exam, get the police clearances, take a number, wait your turn.
 
blackforest said:
Speaking generally, I prefer allowing people to apply for asylum regardless of where they enter.
Click to expand...
Then crying “Asylum!” becomes a get in free card.

It really astounds me that so many Americans think of people from less developed nations as innocent and naive and really really good, like 4-year-olds.

If people in the US don’t think that word gets around in Latin America as to how to scam the system, then it is the Americans who are being innocent and naive.
 
blackforest said:
Trump recently passed a law, however, requiring specific ports of entry. This will inevitably overwhelm our already broken immigration system.
Click to expand...
How so? We will either have the same number applying for asylum, but all in one place and without the necessity of our going out and finding them, or we will have fewer applying for asylum, which would reduce the load.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top