Cardinal Dolan Congratulates President Obama On Re-Election

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tietjen
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Look, Christ does not congratulate sinners. He tells them to repent.

Something tells me you voted for Obama.
Look, we are not Christ. We are not God.
Joh 8:7 When therefore they continued asking him, he lifted up himself and said to them: He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
No, but it’s not unusual have that accusation placed against anyone that critiques republicans, or anyone that displays a lack of love and charity against another human being, who happens to be a politician. I’m shocked when I see people take their political dislikes to an extreme as to turn their ‘critiques’ on men of the Church.
 
Making your opinion known is short of making your opinion superior over theirs.
I can’t help but notice the irony here. Aren’t you the one who is now making an opinion that goes against the Church…that what Canon Law allows for is wrong? Canon Law makes it very clear that we can express opinions that go against those in the heirarchy.
 
I can’t help but notice the irony here. Aren’t you the one who is now making an opinion that goes against the Church…that what Canon Law allows for is wrong? Canon Law makes it very clear that we can express opinions that go against those in the heirarchy.
No, I am not speaking against the Church. I have explained we make our opinions known to the Church, but our opinions have no authority over the authoritative men of the Church.

It’s a shame that partisanship would bring people out to criticize a good man of the Church. 😦
 
Look, we are not Christ. We are not God.

No, but it’s not unusual have that accusation placed against anyone that critiques republicans, or anyone that displays a lack of love and charity against another human being, who happens to be a politician. I’m shocked when I see people take their political dislikes to an extreme as to turn their ‘critiques’ on men of the Church.
So I guess you’re saying Christ would send a congratulations to Obama?
 
So I guess you’re saying Christ would send a congratulations to Obama?
Further placing words in another person’s mouth. Does that somehow prove your point? I’ll be perfectly honest, I do not know what our Lord would do. I can only go by what His instructions were to His followers. Care to show me where He instructed us to be less than charitable to another person?
 
Further placing words in another person’s mouth. Does that somehow prove your point? I’ll be perfectly honest, I do not know what our Lord would do. I can only go by what His instructions were to His followers. Care to show me where He instructed us to be less than charitable to another person?
no one is arguing that instruction of the ignorant should be uncharitable. One can speak truth in charity. If you follow your reasoning to its logical conclusion then no one ever has the right to admonish anyone of anything.
 
Further placing words in another person’s mouth. Does that somehow prove your point? I’ll be perfectly honest, I do not know what our Lord would do. I can only go by what His instructions were to His followers. Care to show me where He instructed us to be less than charitable to another person?
I never implied not being less than charitable.

I think Christ would ask Obama to stop his killing of the innocent.

Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”

I think Christ would have much to say about him.
 
no one is arguing that instruction of the ignorant should be uncharitable. One can speak truth in charity. If you follow your reasoning to its logical conclusion then no one ever has the right to admonish anyone of anything.
I have not said that, or insinuated that. I have said, ‘love and charity in all things.’ I believe Cardinal Dolan’s, and Pope Benedict’s, congratulations were charitable and an expression of love toward a fellow human being. We might notice that they did include messages of a dignity of life with the congratulations. The messages were not strictly congratulations alone. How anyone can judge them as remiss is beyond me.
In particular, we pray that you will exercise your office to pursue the common good, especially in care of the most vulnerable among us, including the unborn, the poor, and the immigrant.We will continue to stand in defense of life, marriage, and our first, most cherished liberty, religious freedom.We pray, too, that you will help restore a sense of civility to the public order, so our public conversations may be imbued with respect and charity toward everyone.
 
I never implied not being less than charitable.

I think Christ would ask Obama to stop his killing of the innocent.

Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”

I think Christ would have much to say about him.
I invite you to reread your posts in this thread.

What did Christ say about Pontius Pilate, or King Herod? Surely you realize the barbarism of the Romans who ruled over them in those days.

He gave those men He chose and appointed their instructions, and He gave instructions to the multitudes (laity) of those times.

Your first post stated: “I’m very disappointed in Cardinal Dolan. He should not have sent anything to Obama.”

A part of his message to Obama stated:
In particular, we pray that you will exercise your office to pursue the common good, especially in care of the most vulnerable among us, including the unborn, the poor, and the immigrant.We will continue to stand in defense of life, marriage, and our first, most cherished liberty, religious freedom.We pray, too, that you will help restore a sense of civility to the public order, so our public conversations may be imbued with respect and charity toward everyone.
 
I have not said that, or insinuated that. I have said, ‘love and charity in all things.’ I believe Cardinal Dolan’s, and Pope Benedict’s, congratulations were charitable and an expression of love toward a fellow human being. We might notice that they did include messages of a dignity of life with the congratulations. The messages were not strictly congratulations alone. How anyone can judge them as remiss is beyond me.
I think that what bothers people about the congratulations, is that many people (myself included) are heart broken over perceptions of abandonment on the part of the hierarchy. I am truly saddened over the outcome of the election because I see it as an assault against life, the family and my Church. I am afraid for the persecutions that I think will come and I look to our Bishops for protection, not for me, but for Holy Mother Church. We have moved way beyond the point of “oh BTW you know how we feel about abortion”, we are headed off the cliff and drastic measures are called for.
 
With all respect, Cardinal Dolan should have apologized to his flock.
Huh? This flock should be apologizing to Cardinal Dolan!

With over 64 million Catholics in the US, and we couldn’t elect a president who espouses views consistent with our Church,** we** need to be apologizing to our leaders for our failure to follow their lead!
 
I think that what bothers people about the congratulations, is that many people (myself included) are heart broken over perceptions of abandonment on the part of the hierarchy. I am truly saddened over the outcome of the election because I see it as an assault against life, the family and my Church. I am afraid for the persecutions that I think will come and I look to our Bishops for protection, not for me, but for Holy Mother Church. We have moved way beyond the point of “oh BTW you know how we feel about abortion”, we are headed off the cliff and drastic measures are called for.
Unless, God’s will has been done…in order that we return to His command to seek conversions of the heart, as opposed to pulling a lever and having legislation attempt to enforce morality, which does not remove the desires.

ETA: Church persecutions have existed to before the Christian Church. God has used trials and tribulations throughout mankind’s history to correct man’s faith in Him.
 
Unless, God’s will has been done…in order that we return to His command to seek conversions of the heart, as opposed to pulling a lever and having legislation attempt to enforce morality, which does not remove the desires.

ETA: Church persecutions have existed to before the Christian Church. God has used trials and tribulations throughout mankind’s history to correct man’s faith in Him.
Do you mean that Catholics who voted against Obama were going against God’s will because it is His intent that his Church must be persecuted in this place and time?
 
Do you mean that Catholics who voted against Obama were going against God’s will because it is His intent that his Church must be persecuted in this place and time?
No I did not mean that. I was thinking out loud, so to speak, that maybe all is as God wills it be, in order to have us return to His command to seek out conversions of the hearts and minds. I would assume all is according to His purpose.

As for persecution, man’s history is full of trials and tribulations placed by God to get man to return his faith to Him. Who hath the mind of the Lord? His ways are not our ways?

What about the first few hundred years of the Church’s history?
Rom 11:33 O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and of the knowledge of God! How incomprehensible are his judgments, and how unsearchable his ways!
Rom 11:34 For who hath known the mind of the Lord? Or who hath been his counsellor?
Rom 11:35 Or who hath first given to him, and recompense shall be made him?
Rom 11:36 For of him, and by him, and in him, are all things: to him be glory for ever. Amen.
Just because it’s not as we desire does not mean God didn’t answer prayers. Sometimes the answer is no.
 
Do you mean that Catholics who voted against Obama were going against God’s will because it is His intent that his Church must be persecuted in this place and time?
Did you really get that out of what I said?
 
Did you really get that out of what I said?
Well, yes. You had replied to Marci who was lamenting the election outcome because she saw the result as an assault against life, family, and the Church.

Your reply was “Unless, God’s will has been done…” referring to Gods desire for a change of heart, and referencing prior persecutions.

Now I don’t deny at all that God may cleanse his Church through suffering and hardship. That may indeed be his intent. He can surely bring good out of evil. Still, not knowing the divine will, I still believe that we ought to do what we can to protect life, family, and the Church, and the political process is not excluded from our area of action as laity.
 
Well, yes. You had replied to Marci who was lamenting the election outcome because she saw the result as an assault against life, family, and the Church.

Your reply was “Unless, God’s will has been done…” referring to Gods desire for a change of heart, and referencing prior persecutions.

Now I don’t deny at all that God may cleanse his Church through suffering and hardship. That may indeed be his intent. He can surely bring good out of evil. Still, not knowing the divine will, I still believe that we ought to do what we can to protect life, family, and the Church, and the political process is not excluded from our area of action as laity.
Of course we should. Let’s just hope it’s not the political process being the reason of hardships. It does in a way place men before Him, at least some do place an amazing amount of trust in them.
 
If a person is approached in what could be a humiliation, as a public correction, it could entrench them in their wrongness. To do that makes one complicit in the wrongs from that point on.

How would you react if your priest called you out on a sin on the steps of your Church, with news reporters ready for the ‘breaking news?’ Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

There is no teaching for men to publicly chastise, or correct another person’s faults. To do so could easily be viewed as lacking in love, and most certainly charity.

We need to let our clergy do their job and have faith in them.
The teaching of fraternal correction, of which you speak, can be done in public if the offense was public and the public was somehow unduly scandalized and needed to know the truth for some important reason.

There’s a difference between say, the Benghazi situation, which looks like a cover-up and the papparazzi running around taking pictures of celebs misbehaving.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top