Cardinal Kasper on the Final Synod Document

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pulvis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Pulvis

Guest
ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/cardinal-kasper-exhortation-could-be-published-saturday?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NCRegisterDailyBlog+National+Catholic+Register#When%3A2016-03-16+17%3A59%3A01

“Cardinal Walter Kasper has said Pope Francis’ eagerly anticipated summary document on the Synod on the Family could be published as soon as this Saturday, and that it will mark the “first step” in a reform of the Church that has taken nearly two millennia to achieve.
According to the Italian newspaper Il Terreno, the German theologian told an audience in the Italian city of Lucca on Monday evening that in a “few days (March 19)” a document of about “two hundred pages will be released”.
It’s not clear if, by saying “released”, Cardinal Kasper meant that the document, called a post-synodal apostolic exhortation, will be published on Saturday, or be signed by Pope Francis and published later once it is translated, as usually happens with such documents.
Until now, sources in Rome have said the document will be signed on March 19, the Feast of St. Joseph, but the actual date of publication has remained unknown.
The cardinal, whose theology Pope Francis has often lauded, went on to say that in the document the Holy Father will “definitively express himself on family issues addressed during the last Synod, and in particular on the participation of the divorced and remarried faithful in the active life of the Catholic community.”
He added that the apostolic exhortation will represent “the first step in a reform” that will mark the “turning of a page” in the Church’s history “after 1,700 years.”
"We must not repeat past formulas and barricade ourselves behind the wall of exclusivism and clericalism,” Cardinal Kasper told a packed aula in Lucca’s Real Collegio, adding that the Church must live in the current times and “know how to interpret them.” He then spoke about giving more opportunities for women to serve in Church administration.

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edwa...on-could-be-published-saturday/#ixzz43AOnZSsl"
 
He added that the apostolic exhortation will represent “the first step in a reform” that will mark the “turning of a page” in the Church’s history “after 1,700 years."
What happened 1,700 years ago and has never been “reformed”?
We must not repeat past formulas
Why not? Is that a universal directive?
and barricade ourselves behind the wall of exclusivism and clericalism
Who has done that and who is now proposing it?

Dan
 
“He added that the apostolic exhortation will represent “the first step in a reform” that will mark the “turning of a page” in the Church’s history “after 1,700 years.”"

This kind of talk in a time when we are at a huge faith crisis, is very scandalous and breathes against dogma.

I doubt even the Pope feels this way.
 
No one can speak for the Pope except the Pope. I doubt the Pope thinks anything like folk want him to. He is Peter and on this rock your Church is founded.
 
Think you’ll need another source since this comes from a blog.
 
I for one am happy that we have men like Cardinal Walter Kasper in our Church. He gives me hope for the future. Too often I see Catholics expressing a hope in the past and despair for everything else. Fear and despair are incompatible with Christianity.
 
Rahner dismantled the Sacrament of the Eucharist.

Kasper is dismantling the Sacrament of Marriage.

Somehow we need to put a stop to this now, or deal with the next person who will try to dismantle the Church.
 
“He added that the apostolic exhortation will represent “the first step in a reform” that will mark the “turning of a page” in the Church’s history “after 1,700 years.”"

This kind of talk in a time when we are at a huge faith crisis, is very scandalous and breathes against dogma.

I doubt even the Pope feels this way.
As you noted, it is truly awful and scandalous. I’m dreading this exhortation. I have slim to no hopes that it will help the faith or the faithful.
 
As you noted, it is truly awful and scandalous. I’m dreading this exhortation. I have slim to no hopes that it will help the faith or the faithful.
I believe it will help the faith, but it has to be taken as whole and in context. If people take only one liners and twist them they can make it out to be whatever they want, which does an injustice to faith and sacndelizes others.
 
Rahner dismantled the Sacrament of the Eucharist.

Kasper is dismantling the Sacrament of Marriage.

Somehow we need to put a stop to this now, or deal with the next person who will try to dismantle the Church.
Nothing of a sort. The Eucharist is the Eucharist plain and simple, as is Marriage.

To dismantle either would to be to dismantle the Church.
 
Personally I listen to the views of Jesus on the issue of the eucharist (do this in memory of me) and marriage ( thinking about adultery is a sin too in his book, but then he did come to save sinners and he was making a point to the over pious)
 
Personally I listen to the views of Jesus on the issue of the eucharist (do this in memory of me) and marriage ( thinking about adultery is a sin too in his book, but then he did come to save sinners and he was making a point to the over pious)
One example I am talking about is Cardinal Kaspers proposal to give Communion to the divorced and remarried. But thinking about it, that is more of an effort to dismantle the Eucharist although it has a double effect of dismantling Matrimony.
 
I’m divorced but not remarried. The divorce was not of my choosing. Would Jesus have punished me for anothers sin ?
 
I for one am happy that we have men like Cardinal Walter Kasper in our Church
Same here, though I also have to say I am glad we have men like Cardinal Sarah as well (I mention him because I saw him on another thread).
 
I’m divorced but not remarried. The divorce was not of my choosing. Would Jesus have punished me for anothers sin ?
Well, he didn’t add “except if they leave you” as an exemption in the passage.
 
I’m divorced but not remarried. The divorce was not of my choosing. Would Jesus have punished me for anothers sin ?
Hello,

No, certainly you would/should not be punished for another’s sin.

The fact that we are talking about “another’s sin” means that he/she did wrong: it was a sin against your marriage. Since we are talking about “your marriage”, then the Church would say that you cannot “marry again.”

If you attempted to do so, that act would be your choice and certain consequences would follow from that action.

Dan
 
I’m divorced but not remarried. The divorce was not of my choosing. Would Jesus have punished me for anothers sin ?
While I am closer to change on this than I am on the status quo, I would point out that there are many times we have to bear the consequences of the sin of another person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top