Why not listen to the wives of the priests we have now. I heard one of the wives say it was a really bad idea. She is living that life so she should know.
A priest has to be available to his parishioners at all times, even on Christmas Eve if one is dying. I think it would be harder than being married to a doctor and that is hard enough.
I understand your point and I agree that we should leave celibacy as a major part of the priesthood, but this is not a good argument.
I’ve worked 30 years in the electric utility business, the last 7 as a manager. Do you have any idea how many birthdays and Christmas Eves and football games, weddings, Sunday Masses, fishing trips, )I think you get the picture) that I missed working as a lineman?
Priests do not get anywhere near the calls in the middle of the night as linemen on call 24/7/365. There are times I don’t see my wife awake for two or three weeks at a time during hurricane restoration. I have traveled out of state on storm repair duty for up to five weeks at a time (North Mississippi ice storm of ’94), yet we still have a great marriage.
What about husbands who work in the oil field and are gone for up to three months at a time?
I’ve seen this argument made here repeatedly and it holds no water in reality. To think that a man who is at his home in bed with his wife sleeping cannot respond to a sick call like the same man sleeping in his celibate bed at a rectory in the same efficient and affective manner is just plain insane.
I think the issue is that he is sleeping in the bed with a wife.
Again I repeat, I am not arguing to change the discipline, simply suggesting to not using this argument because it is not legitimate. Neither am I saying not speak to the wives, just don’t make the argument about being available at all hours because a married man can just as easily as a celibate man.