C
Celeste88
Guest
KathleenElsie said:**IMO For many years the Democratic party stood for social justice and was a good thing.
Then the 1960s came and they embraced the “culture of death.” They still talk about social justice and I believe many members think they can ignore the “death” issue in the name of social justice. But we could not. We changed parties because of the “death” platform. This issue “trumps” all other issues in our opinion.
The other party is not perfect. But as a Catholic that wants to vote in the primary elections in Pennsylvania I need to be a member of one of the two main parties. We were registered as independent for a few years and found we were disenfranchised. The only time we could vote in primary elections was on issues and propositions. We would rather not be members of any party. But, we want to vote and have our votes count.We still vote for social justice issues. The November elections are not party only votes.
We refuse to have our names on the membership where “death” IMHO is its main platform. Just as we would not join the Masons nor other anti-Catholic Church teachings organizations, we won’t add our names to the democratic Party. If they stopped supporting the “death” and “anti-family” issues then we would re-think our position.
**
I am not sure by what you mean that in the 1960’s they embraced the culture of death. Do you mean the escalation of the war in Vietnam at the time? Certainly killing 58,000 of our country’s young men would contribute to the culture of death…but then weren’t Republicans , i.e. Nixon involved in this war also?