V
a big part of the reason he got my vote in the primaryOne of Ron Paul’s campaign pledges was to abolish the IRS.
This is a very noble cause.
Does anyone know exactly when the IRS fined Catholic Answers? Was it during this presidency or the last? I just see that Catholic Answers filed suit on April 3, 2009.
i think it was during the bush adminastration over the bush/kerry race, but i could be mistaken. beaucracy is a slow thing so it could just be coming up now.Does anyone know exactly when the IRS fined Catholic Answers? Was it during this presidency or the last? I just see that Catholic Answers filed suit on April 3, 2009.
According to the story in the OP, the fine was in 2004 over a comment Keating made in one of his e-letters regarding the fact that John Kerry should not receive Communion because of his stance on abortion.Does anyone know exactly when the IRS fined Catholic Answers? Was it during this presidency or the last? I just see that Catholic Answers filed suit on April 3, 2009.
Well, the original story just says the e-letter was in 2004, not necessarily the fine.According to the story in the OP, the fine was in 2004 over a comment Keating made in one of his e-letters regarding the fact that John Kerry should not receive Communion because of his stance on abortion.
I don’t doubt the IRS would take 5 years to fine somebody, but I wouldn’t think Catholic Answers would wait 5 years to sue over it, but alas, I am not a tax specialist.In an announcement posted at the organization’s web site, Catholic Answers president Karl Keating explained that the IRS fined the group for a 2004 e-letter it wrote saying that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry should not be allowed to receive Holy Communion.
The IRS issued its fine in March, 2008 according to the legal complaint which was filed in court against the US government.Well, the original story just says the e-letter was in 2004, not necessarily the fine.
I don’t doubt the IRS would take 5 years to fine somebody, but I wouldn’t think Catholic Answers would wait 5 years to sue over it, but alas, I am not a tax specialist.
Given that it was a comment made by one Catholic about another Catholic, the IRSwas obviously meddling. The best thing to do would be to get rid of the old LBJ law that is the basis of their authority in the matter. As it it, the IRS acts arbitrarily, allowing black churches openly to endorse candidates while penalizing others.The IRS issued its fine in March, 2008 according to the legal complaint which was filed in court against the US government.
jamesmadisoncenter.org/CAKK/CAKKComplaint.pdf
(see page 8)
Thanks for this brief, Dale.The IRS issued its fine in March, 2008 according to the legal complaint which was filed in court against the US government.
jamesmadisoncenter.org/CAKK/CAKKComplaint.pdf (see page 8)
You are most welcome, Ani Ibi. I am glad that you, too, found it interesting.Thanks for this brief, Dale.
Ah yes, I failed to recognize that possibility.Well, the original story just says the e-letter was in 2004, not necessarily the fine.
I don’t doubt the IRS would take 5 years to fine somebody, but I wouldn’t think Catholic Answers would wait 5 years to sue over it, but alas, I am not a tax specialist.
Regardless, I hope everybody is making a donation, even if its small.
Hi Dale. Yes, I found it interesting. Long – as usual – but interesting.You are most welcome, Ani Ibi. I am glad that you, too, found it interesting.
One of the nice things about CAF is that we are able to easily share useful information.![]()
Yes, online forums definitely can strain a person’s patience. I’ve learned a lot here at CAF and am grateful it exists, but I have had to take time-outs occasionally because sometimes the inevitable internet goofiness becomes overwhelming.Unfortunately, so many (too many in my opinion) figure that they can bark at me, put words in my mouth, argue from ad hominem, refuse to read the material yet judge it nonetheless, try to play the expert and any number of things which I have learned to toss straight in the bully bag.