G
GeorgeSword
Guest
I thought you might be interested to know that we were banned from the forum this morning just for being Catholics. That said, in a post discussing our banning, most of the members seem to think it was unjustified:
why was he banned?
i am nobody, but i had no problem with him being here.
he couldn’t change my beliefs any more than a muslim could.
if you don’t subscribe too or want to see his posts, don’t click on them.
banning him is censorship…
This is a private forum, I think that it is in the best interests of the people who started it (Newton2012, and Dudev) to keep it on target with it’s stated name. The Watcher Forum. I’m all for open debate but linking all those sites and then rebutting our questions with very poor answers or no answers at all is a poor usage of this forum and a hinderance to this forums purpose.
Censorship? I think not. He can go somewhere else and spout that stuff. How’s that censorship? Gee, if somebody came on here and started talking about making chocolate chip cookies and told us that we need to make chocolate chip cookies or we’d all die would banning them be wrong? No! His posts had about the same effect.
Let’s get back to watching instead of being distracted with this Jesuit confusion maker.
I hate catholicism!!!
Enoch
P.S. But I love the people.
A catholic missionary?lol.
But I do have to wonder, do we not seek to spread the conspiracist anti-catholic dogma?
I’ve accepted that this is my lot, but often I hear a sanctimonious tone against the Rcc.
As believers we should be armed and ready, but I hear a lot of plain old nastiness against them. It reminds me of how the Jews viewed the samaritans. Though the attack on their idolatry was justified, I don’t think that it was Christlike to treat them as dogs. Jesus didn’t either.
It just doesn’t seem sincere to add token statements of love ( as afterthoughts) after really treating a person badly. If Pablo is violating the rules and purpose of the board then he should go. If he’s rude then he should also go. But I’ve heard rudeness towArd him too… Should that be overlooked?
It just seems like a double standard toward uncomely conduct.
why was he banned?
i am nobody, but i had no problem with him being here.
he couldn’t change my beliefs any more than a muslim could.
if you don’t subscribe too or want to see his posts, don’t click on them.
banning him is censorship…
This is a private forum, I think that it is in the best interests of the people who started it (Newton2012, and Dudev) to keep it on target with it’s stated name. The Watcher Forum. I’m all for open debate but linking all those sites and then rebutting our questions with very poor answers or no answers at all is a poor usage of this forum and a hinderance to this forums purpose.
Censorship? I think not. He can go somewhere else and spout that stuff. How’s that censorship? Gee, if somebody came on here and started talking about making chocolate chip cookies and told us that we need to make chocolate chip cookies or we’d all die would banning them be wrong? No! His posts had about the same effect.
Let’s get back to watching instead of being distracted with this Jesuit confusion maker.
I hate catholicism!!!
Enoch
P.S. But I love the people.
A catholic missionary?lol.
But I do have to wonder, do we not seek to spread the conspiracist anti-catholic dogma?
I’ve accepted that this is my lot, but often I hear a sanctimonious tone against the Rcc.
As believers we should be armed and ready, but I hear a lot of plain old nastiness against them. It reminds me of how the Jews viewed the samaritans. Though the attack on their idolatry was justified, I don’t think that it was Christlike to treat them as dogs. Jesus didn’t either.
It just doesn’t seem sincere to add token statements of love ( as afterthoughts) after really treating a person badly. If Pablo is violating the rules and purpose of the board then he should go. If he’s rude then he should also go. But I’ve heard rudeness towArd him too… Should that be overlooked?
It just seems like a double standard toward uncomely conduct.