Catholic Church accused of ignoring 'laundry slaves'

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timidity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder what he is looking for.
Just a guess based on some research: as a child he was placed in foster care and abused, so this is his way of dealing with it. He’s done this kind of thing about the Anglican Church and the local government there, so at least he isn’t one of those “Catholics are pedophiles” types.
 
There was an article about this in the local newspaper this morning, but I can’t find an online version to link to. Apparently he disrupted Mass at two city churches on Sunday. The police were called to one of the churches, but they didn’t take any action against him.

I don’t know where to go to get more information about this, but I’ll post back here if I can find anything.
 
I asked the University Catholic chaplain about this issue today after Mass. He said that the girls at Mount St Canice were generally there by court order, and were usually of the bad sort. They were basically kept there by order of the court, and one of their duties would have been working in the laundry, which is where a lot of the diocese’s laundry would have been done. So they weren’t really slaves in the sense of being “owned”, but they were probably kept their against their will somewhat.

However, father also said that the girls generally loved the sisters, and so I think that speaks volumes about whether or not they were or could be called, “slaves”.
 
I wonder what he is looking for.
Byz Cath you wonder what he is looking for? Easy!
There is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ to me made in these accusations. The Catholic church is fair game today, anyone wants to buy a holiday house without working for it, accuse the church of something and be assured that your holiday hosue dream becomes a reality. Veracity has little to do with it. Justice has little to do with it. $$$$$$$$$$$
GraceAngel.
 
Byz Cath you wonder what he is looking for? Easy!
There is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ to me made in these accusations. The Catholic church is fair game today, anyone wants to buy a holiday house without working for it, accuse the church of something and be assured that your holiday hosue dream becomes a reality. Veracity has little to do with it. Justice has little to do with it. $$$$$$$$$$$
GraceAngel.
That hardly sounds charitable. Remember that rash judgment is a sin. You should assume that his intentions are good whenever possible.
 
I asked the University Catholic chaplain about this issue today after Mass. He said that the girls at Mount St Canice were generally there by court order, and were usually of the bad sort. They were basically kept there by order of the court, and one of their duties would have been working in the laundry, which is where a lot of the diocese’s laundry would have been done. So they weren’t really slaves in the sense of being “owned”, but they were probably kept their against their will somewhat.

However, father also said that the girls generally loved the sisters, and so I think that speaks volumes about whether or not they were or could be called, “slaves”.
Thanks for the local insight!
 
Thanks for the local insight!
No problem. Personally, I would chalk this one up to hysterical leftist activism; the kind that is killing aboriginal children. That’s probably quite a read if you’re not familiar with the “Stolen Generation” myth. I call it a myth because the popular representation in the media of the so-called “Stolen Generation”, seems to me to be completely false. The result of this is that government agencies are absolutely paranoid about removing children from dangerous aboriginal homes, because they will be lambasted for it in the media.

I mention this, because I suspect that the activist mentioned in the story has probably gotten his ideas from the Stolen Generation bandwagon. Believe me, it is quite a bandwagon!
 
IHe said that the girls at Mount St Canice were generally there by court order, and were usually of the bad sort. They were basically kept there by order of the court, and one of their duties would have been working in the laundry, which is where a lot of the diocese’s laundry would have been done.
This is a little off-topic but didn’t Ireland have a similar arrangement? I seem to recall a 60 Minutes episode (investigative television program) about it.
 
That hardly sounds charitable. Remember that rash judgment is a sin. You should assume that his intentions are good whenever possible.
Hello Timidity, you be charitable and let me have an opinion. Please and thank you.
GranceAngel.
 
Hello Timidity, you be charitable and let me have an opinion. Please and thank you.
GranceAngel.
So your admitting that your accusations are actually just an opinion, and not based on fact? Then why indeed would you put such an opinion in writing - where it can be read by anyone and taken as fact - when it is anything but fact? Timidity did do the charitable thing in correcting your sin. It is always charitable to correct someone’s sin.
 
So your admitting that your accusations are actually just an opinion, and not based on fact? Then why indeed would you put such an opinion in writing - where it can be read by anyone and taken as fact - when it is anything but fact? Timidity did do the charitable thing in correcting your sin. It is always charitable to correct someone’s sin.
They are a bit more than an opinion they are a fact but I dont want to go into that thank you very much.
And stop playing semantics. Again thanks.
GraceAngel.
 
Warning: Please discuss the topic, not each other. Thanks for your cooperation.
 
This is old, old news. The head of the order publicly apologized for the misdeeds a year or so ago.
 
They are a bit more than an opinion they are a fact but I dont want to go into that thank you very much.
And stop playing semantics. Again thanks.
GraceAngel.
Well you were the one that said it was an opinion. So how do you know it’s a fact? What’s your source?
 
Hi, I realize this thread is quite old but, having stumbled upon it, I feel I need to set the record staright. There has been conjecture on this page about whether laundry ‘slaves’ ever existed at Mt St Canice in Tasmania - the general consensus seeming to be that any adverse claims have been made from those seeking compensation. Other people have asked for ‘proof’ from people trying to be fair minded on the subject. I am here as ‘proof’ this place existed in the manner it has been described, where women of all ages (12 - 70+) were subjected to a regime of prayer, silence and hard work for no wages. Some priest has claimed we were ‘bad’ types of girls it appears, therefore deserving of this fate. Lord help us all if this is the opinion people in the church have and no wonder those poor lost souls cannot receive any compensation for years of upaid work and deprivation. I also read he claimed the girls ‘loved’ the sisters. Oh, please, we have all heard of the Stockhom syndrome haven’t we? Again, a condition created through sensory deprivation and forced dependence, is not what one wold call ‘love’.
I am a much older woman now, one who has never sought compensation for the stolen years of my life, so I have nothing to gain by telling untrurths. As a writer, I receive mail on a regular basis from women all over the world, including Mt St Canice, seeking closure from past experiences in convents through the writing of their stories. It is sad their original abuse has to be compounded by now being labelled liars in their older years.
These things did happen and, until their is due recogntion and reparation, an apology is worth nothing.
Merlene
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top