Catholic church accuses BBC of 'anti-Christian' bias

  • Thread starter Thread starter Netty1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pardon me, but this is a “surprise?”

Really???:eek:

I’m “surprised” the BBC hasn’t come out with a program named “This Week-With Richard Dawkins.”
 
Stupid BBC. Wouldn’t it be good if we could all go live at the Vatican? 😃
 
I always find it laughable when people defend the BBC as an objective and trustworthy news source because it is outside the US media bias. It’s as though people outside the country are somehow magically unbiased.
 
I read online news from the U.S., Germany, and other countries. I have found the BBC to be generally accurate in its coverages. I particularly like their international coverage of matters the major news media in the United States seems to miss or gloss over.
 
OriginalJS said:
I read online news from the U.S., Germany, and other countries. I have found the BBC to be generally accurate in its coverages. I particularly like their international coverage of matters the major news media in the United States seems to miss or gloss over.
Click to expand...
A BBC representative admitted that the BBC was bias against Christianity and they will find a religious editor.
 
OriginalJS said:
I read online news from the U.S., Germany, and other countries. I have found the BBC to be generally accurate in its coverages. I particularly like their international coverage of matters the major news media in the United States seems to miss or gloss over.
Click to expand...
I agree. For any news that does not involve religion (which is probably upwards of 90% of total news), I’ve yet to find a better source than the BBC (and to be perfectly honest, there are no mainstream media outlets that cover religion very well, so it’s not a real good baseline to use when they all score an F). Especially for news outside of North America and Europe, there’s simply no one else even in their class.
 
The BBC is the voice of the British establishment, which has been anti-catholic since the time of Henry 8th. It is increasingly secularist in its approach, but after 30 years of religion-based war in N. Ireland, costing over 3000 lives, and the emergence of islamist groups and their absurd claims and demands, so is the greater part of the country.

Channel 4 has an on-going infatuation with homosexuality and libertarianism, and promote Dickie Dawkins quite heavily.

Christianity in general, and catholicism in particular, are the only minority groups that anyone is allowed to denigate without censure.

But, in truth, most of the things that damage us are self-inflicted. The damage done by errant priests is greater by far than any done by outsiders to the faith.
 
The BBC is also more than JUST anti-Christian; it is also heavily anti-Israel and very pro-Hamas/Palestinian as well, with a smattering of Anti-Semitism thrown in as well.
And its opinion of America and American actions worldwide is well, to quote somebody earlier in the thread, “establishment.” 😊
PBS for Anglophile Snobs.
 
The CBC in Canada is just as bad, I watch both.

The CBC lionized Henry Morgentaler, an abortion pioneer and it all but cheered homosexual faux-marriage as “progress” while also being biased towards embryocidal stem cell Frankenresearch.

Our urban secular elites know best – the new paternalism.
 
Canuckistani said:
The CBC in Canada is just as bad
Click to expand...
Add Australia’s ABC and you’ve got the full set. They are quite reliable and objective on most issues, but viciously anti-Catholic on anything which touches on Catholicism even in passing…
 
Thyme said:
A BBC representative admitted that the BBC was bias against Christianity and they will find a religious editor.
Click to expand...
Really? This is good news and can only make the BBC better. I usually watch the BBC to get a different perspective from what is generally shown in the U.S. and I find it helpful, but I have to admit, after watching a recent broadcast concerning the sex abuse scandals that took place in the Church, I found there was very little perspective or fairness and I was disappointed. I thought that particular broadcast, at least, was biased against the Church and the Holy Father.
 
They do not have an anti-Christian bias, instead they lack a PRO-Christian bias. Which to some is the same thing.
 
cyberwolf001 said:
They do not have an anti-Christian bias, instead they lack a PRO-Christian bias. Which to some is the same thing.
Click to expand...
Anti-Christian bias - Rather self explanatory, but simplifying it even further, we get hatred, aggression and general (also intentional) misrepresnentation of the facts. Panaroma can be an example of this.

Pro-Christian bias - Promoting and favouring in the viewpoint of the Christian religion, may or may not be destorted.

Lack of a Pro-Christian bias - Promoting and favouring many viewpoints without the hostility and hatred and deliberate distortion of the facts for the Christian viewpoint.

If it’s showing hostility towards something, and is either distorting any factual basis or is deliberately hostile without it’s ‘equality’, then it’s definetly anti.

The Director General of the BBC, granted is apparently Catholic, however alot of the BBC are infested with left-wing viewpoints which are anti-English Tradition and anti-Christian.

Also being anti (not lack of pro) they push censorship, but if you don’t believe that, take a look: dailymail.co.uk/news/article-411846/We-biased-admit-stars-BBC-News.html

God Bless,

Christopher.
 
CGDouglas said:
Anti-Christian bias - Rather self explanatory, but simplifying it even further, we get hatred, aggression and general (also intentional) misrepresnentation of the facts. Panaroma can be an example of this.

Pro-Christian bias - Promoting and favouring in the viewpoint of the Christian religion, may or may not be destorted.

Lack of a Pro-Christian bias - Promoting and favouring many viewpoints without the hostility and hatred and deliberate distortion of the facts for the Christian viewpoint.

If it’s showing hostility towards something, and is either distorting any factual basis or is deliberately hostile without it’s ‘equality’, then it’s definetly anti.
Click to expand...
Yes I know my definitions very well thank you. I got a High School degree an everything. (From a High School in a Red State in a Red County that had a conservative bias and was skilled at sneaking prayers and bible study into the curriculum no less!)
The Director General of the BBC, granted is apparently Catholic, however alot of the BBC are infested with left-wing viewpoints which are anti-English Tradition and anti-Christian.
Click to expand...
Also being anti (not lack of pro) they push censorship, but if you don’t believe that, take a look: dailymail.co.uk/news/article-411846/We-biased-admit-stars-BBC-News.html
Click to expand...
God Bless,
Click to expand...
Christopher.
Click to expand...
I listen to the BBC very often along with Conservative sources it’s rare for me to hear them even mention a Christian story. When they do they mention both sides, which to some WOULD be Anti-Christian.
 
cyberwolf001 said:
Yes I know my definitions very well thank you. I got a High School degree an everything. (From a High School in a Red State in a Red County that had a conservative bias and was skilled at sneaking prayers and bible study into the curriculum no less!)
Click to expand...
Not sure what this has to do with a High School degree, it’s common sense, and you don’t need a degree for common sense. Also if you knew the definitions, then you’d know that lacking of a pro on matters does not equate anti. A lacking of a pro-side for Christianity can still induce ‘equal’ (which the government is supposed to support) views of the Christians, you know, their actual views? Where as an anti just goes staight for the opposition.
40.png
cyberwolf001:
I listen to the BBC very often along with Conservative sources it’s rare for me to hear them even mention a Christian story. When they do they mention both sides, which to some WOULD be Anti-Christian.
Click to expand...
The BBC isn’t just limited to the news, it covers dramas, documentaries and so forth.

An American listener would know more about it that an native Englishman, is that what you’re trying to say? A Christian story is seldom mentioned (unless it’s about being hunted down by Muslims, or expelled from an work area for praying), and when it is, just like the recent scandal abuse, it jumps aboard like The Times. Furthermore if you want to see deliberate bias, watch their Panorama episode on the sexual abuse within the Church. Maybe they ‘accidentally’ misread the documentation, but yet somehow managed to misrepresent the data presented.

Even in the previous link I sent, the BBC stars admitting that they are liberally biased on religion and politics. And if you know English History, you would know that the liberal establishment tried and is trying to break away from the Traditional England and is pushing for a Republican England, and in it’s anti-Tradition, it is also anti-Christian.

Archbishop John Sentamu in 2006 stated that Christians took more “knocks” in BBC programmes than other faiths, Robin Aitken names Christians as BBC’s ‘in-house pariah groups’.

And as along with the previous link in the previous post, here’s an additional link:

thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23371706-yes-we-are-biased-on-religion-and-politics-admit-bbc-executives.do

Also:
The BBC smears a devout Roman Catholic European.

Please feel free to actually read these links, and actually understand when BBC officials themselves actually come out to admit such an act.

God Bless,

Christopher.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top