Catholic Church founded by Jesus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glenn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is this the sort of thing you’re looking for? If so, there’s way more of it than we could ever hope to post here. That’s why I’ve directed you to a couple of books that’ll hep you out.
Yes, I think these things will be helpful. But initially, I only knew the question. I did not know the answer, or what form it would take. In one sense, I guess I was looking for personal testimonies, because I am not sure how I can sort out all the arguments for and against in my own mind.
 
I guess I was looking for personal testimonies
Heh, that’s kinda funny. Usually personal testimonies are the least-accepted form of evidence XD.

You’re going to be hard pressed to find anything from the early years of the Church that explicitly references the Catholic Church because, at the time, there was no need to distinguish. It wasn’t until the heresies and later schisms that we had to be more specific. St. Irinaius does call the Church capital-C Catholic. I believe his is the first recorded instance of it, though he does so with a casualness which implies that it was a universally-understood descriptor. People just spoke of The Church, and history tells us that that church was the Catholic Church.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think you are asking a serious question. Do you expect us to comb through the New Testament, the Didache, the Epistle of Clement, Irinaeus, Eusebius, and all the rest of them, and cut and paste a few paragraphs that we hope you may kindly condescend to find acceptable as what you call “actual evidence”? Or, if that’s not what you’re asking, then what are you asking, exactly?
I’m not expecting anything from you. I simply asked the question, and I would hope you would answer it in the way that you think is most appropriate. I did not mandate how you should do that. But all you are doing is judging me and insulting me by telling me that my question is not serious.
 
But all you are doing is judging me and insulting me by telling me that my question is not serious.
The problem is that, to us, your question doesn’t really make sense. You are asking for historical evidence while seemingly rejecting historical evidence. We tell you what the evidence is, but then you say that’s not what you’re looking for.

I think there is a problem of language here, where you are intending something that isn’t coming across in your question. You are using generalities to ask for something specific, so we don’t know how to respond satisfactorily; that, or you don’t really know what you’re looking for. If you don’t know what you’re seeking then it’s hard for us to provide it, and it gets very frustrating when our attempts are rejected without further clarification.

The other issue is that many trolls post questions like yours and then spend their whole time just saying “no” to anything we put forward. It can be a little jading, and it makes it hard to take the question seriously when it looks like the same thing is happening.
 
Last edited:
The problem is that, to us, your question doesn’t really make sense. You are asking for historical evidence while seemingly rejecting historical evidence. We tell you what the evidence is, but then you say that’s not what you’re looking for.
I never rejected the sources specified. I just asked what evidence those source provided?
you don’t really know what you’re looking for.
That is probably true. I just asked the question. I don’t know how it is best answered. “How” was the operative word in my question. I was hoping you would tell me.
The other issue is that many trolls post questions like yours and then spend their whole time just saying “no” to anything we put forward. It can be a little jading, and it makes it hard to take the question seriously when it looks like the same thing is happening.
I think that someone saying “no” does not mean that they are not searching.

I did not come on this forum to be combative. But it seems that some individuals were armed and ready.
 
I never rejected the sources specified. I just asked what evidence those source provided?
I realize that, that’s why I was trying to link you to it. The issue is that, in a sense, you seem to be asking us to do your homework for you. We’re happy to do a bit and get you started but this is a personal journey you’re going to have to take. It’s a life-long journey, really an eternal one if you’re doing it right. 😛 I recommend picking up that book about the ECFs if you’re trying to start back at the beginning. The Vatican website also has some of these writings, and are working on digitizing more of them.
That is probably true. I just asked the question. I don’t know how it is best answered. “How” was the operative word in my question. I was hoping you would tell me.
It’s hard to answer the “how” for someone else. For me, the history of the Church is clear evidence, as are the Eucharistic miracles. I don’t really need much more than that. I have a lot more, but I don’t need it. I don’t know what you need, I can’t really know how to help, so I’m doing the best I can by you. My best advice is to ask the Holy Spirit to give you what you need. It might take a while, you’ll have to be persistent, but I guarantee you’ll get your answer.
I think that someone saying “no” does not mean that they are not searching.
40.png
Glenn:
I did not come on this forum to be combative. But it seems that some individuals were armed and ready.
It tends to mean that when they give no further explanation, no clarification, or just go back to repeating their initial premise without considering anything that’s been said. I’m not accusing you of that, there have just been a few poster in the history of the forums that fit that label. Eventually people tend to stop responding to them because they never even consider what’s said to them, they just repeat themselves over and over again no matter what. They actually strike me as sadly similar to some of the character’s in C.S. Lewis’ The Great Divorce," people who, no matter how blindly obvious the answer is, can’t seem to see it.

Again, not accusing you of that, just saying that’s where a few people’s frustration may be coming from. I do hope you don’t leave, we’d love to continue helping you, we just need to work out what form that help need to take.
 
Last edited:
I think this discussion is a bit difficult because I, for one, do not understand what you mean by “evidence”. To me, the sources are the evidence; read ahead, and see what you think.

But I think, like @ProdglArchitect, that you’re expecting something else. The trouble is I can’t p(name removed by moderator)oint what. Can you help us here ?
 
I realize that, that’s why I was trying to link you to it. The issue is that, in a sense, you seem to be asking us to do your homework for you. We’re happy to do a bit and get you started but this is a personal journey you’re going to have to take. It’s a life-long journey, really an eternal one if you’re doing it right.
If the answer requires homework on my part, that is all I needed to know. But as I said before, I don’t know what will turn the lights on for me. It may be something simple that someone says, an experience that they share, or a prayer.
It’s hard to answer the “how” for someone else. For me, the history of the Church is clear evidence, as are the Eucharistic miracles.
I would not expect you to answer for me. You can only answer for yourself. But I can listen to your “how” and learn from that. Ultimately, it has to be the Holy Spirit. I have to admit that I have been wrestling with this question, and I don’t know if I will be able to sort it all out intellectually. I’m just asking God to show me the truth.
 
If the answer requires homework on my part, that is all I needed to know. But as I said before, I don’t know what will turn the lights on for me. It may be something simple that someone says, an experience that they share, or a prayer.
Oh yeah, it requires homework. Tons and tons and tons of it. Sorry, not exactly the most reassuring answer, but we’re talking about the most important question in human history. There’s no way answering it wouldn’t require a bit of homework 🙂

If you think it’d help, I’d be happy to share the experience that led to my reversion. Most of those experiences are deeply person and involve feelings that simply can’t be communicated through words. They’re also usually pretty specific to the individual. Still, I’d be happy to share if you think it might help.
I have to admit that I have been wrestling with this question, and I don’t know if I will be able to sort it all out intellectually.
I’ll just help you out here and say that you probably won’t be able to. There are very, very few people who have been led to the Truth purely by intellect. The intellect can lead us there, it can even provide overwhelming evidence, but eventually you’ll still have to make a choice about what to believe. It wouldn’t matter if we laid out every possible reason to believe, if a person doesn’t want to believe then nothing can convince them.

You definitely don’t seem to be in that camp though, so I expect you’ll find your “how” eventually, just gotta keep asking. Remember, Jesus tells us

Luke 11:10
For everyone who asks, receives; and the one who seeks, finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.
I’m just asking God to show me the truth.
Then for that, I direct you to one of my favorite people in the whole Bible.

MK 9:24
Then the boy’s father cried out, “I do believe, help my unbelief!”
This is the example we should all follow, even the most faithful among us, because in the end we can all be lead to a deeper faith in God.
 
Last edited:
Just adding to what @ProdglArchitect and @OddBird said in their last few posts.

@Glenn, your tone of voice from the outset has sounded challenging. There is a reason why some of us have been suspicious about your intentions. From time to time we see threads here along the lines of “Show me what you call ‘evidence’ to support this or that Church teaching about Adam and Eve/Moses and Aaron/David and Goliath/Peter and Paul, and I’ll shoot it down. I’ll show you it doesn’t prove anything at all.” Once bitten, twice shy.

Please bear in mind that the shelves are groaning under the weight of the books that have been written, and are still being written, year in and year out, on the history of the Church. What kind of evidence, exactly, are you expecting a bunch of anonymous posters on a comments thread to provide, that you have failed to find in the libraries?
 
Last edited:
Can we break it down thusly?

Christianity did not exist prior to Jesus Christ.

Jesus began his public ministry and gathered the Twelve Apostles.

Jesus presided over/celebrated the Last Supper and was crucified the next day.

His followers referred to themselves as Christian.

Their practices grew into what we refer to as Catholicism.

Other than those facts, all of the writings mention in previous replies, there’s really no other “source.”
 
I think this discussion is a bit difficult because I, for one, do not understand what you mean by “evidence”. To me, the sources are the evidence; read ahead, and see what you think.

But I think, like @ProdglArchitect, that you’re expecting something else. The trouble is I can’t p(name removed by moderator)oint what. Can you help us here ?
Does anyone understand what I was saying?

If you want to see the sources as the evidence, that is fine. But to me, the fact that these sources exist is not the evidence. The evidence is in what they actually taught. That is all I was asking for. Now, if there is something succinct that they taught that affirms that the Church founded by Christ was Catholic, that is great. Jesus said, “I and the Father are one.” That’s all I need to answer that question; I affirm that Jesus is God. But there may not be anything quite so succinct in the Church Fathers about the founding of Church, so if I need to spend time meditating on what the sources taught–the evidence–then that is fine as well.
 
@Glenn, your tone of voice from the outset has sounded challenging. There is a reason why some of us have been suspicious about your intentions. From time to time we see threads here along the lines of “Show me what you call ‘evidence’ to support this or that Church teaching about Adam and Eve/Moses and Aaron/David and Goliath/Peter and Paul, and I’ll shoot it down. I’ll show you it doesn’t prove anything at all.” Once bitten, twice shy.
I think I understand. I can see how you were interpreted my question as disputing the evidence, but that was not my intent. I assumed that the historical sources had something to say that was pertinent to my question. I just want to know what that was.
 
Okay, @Glenn. I think we’re on the same wavelength now. Let me break down your original question into two parts, to see if this will help us move forward.
  1. What is the evidence showing that Jesus founded a church?
  2. What is the evidence showing that the church that Jesus founded is the same church that calls itself the Catholic Church today?
May we assume that you know the answer to question 1 and are only seeking the answer to question 2?
 
What kind of evidence, exactly, are you expecting a bunch of anonymous posters on a comments thread to provide, that you have failed to find in the libraries?
Just a community of believers who are sharing their thoughts…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top