R
Ridgerunner
Guest
I think we are missing some information. In the article, it declares that it was church property. It also says it was inhabited by a family of 14. There is probably a way that is consistent, but the article doesn’t give us enough information to know.I did not know about this incident. It is most unfortunate. However, I think your statement about the lack of respect by the Israeli government, which is not perfect by any means, is too broad.
Arabs own land in Israel, but not many. Not many Jews do either. Most of Israel is owned by the State of Israel and is simply leased to the residents, not altogether different from the way it is in Hawaii where it’s virtually impossible to buy land and almost everybody leases. I expect it’s true in both places because they’re so tiny.
Palestinian land ownership is often unclear, because before Israel there was no central registry of land ownership. You were deemed to own something if you were there and nobody of consequence said you didn’t. If, of course, somebody of consequence said you didn’t, you would be moved out. In this country, we expect land ownership to be clear and capable of establishment. It’s not like that over there except in Israel itself, and then only after the establishment of the State of Israel.
But in some parts of the West Bank, ownership is clear. Here, for example, is a picture of the home of one Palestinian homeowner. google.com/search?q=munib+masri&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADFA_enUS486&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=fmCFUvuZDqHY2wXW2oHQAw&ved=0CDwQsAQ&biw=1024&bih=571 He owns 70 acres, which is a lot in that part of the world, and nobody contests it.
Impressed me.