Catholic Priest: Backers of Obama Should Attend Confession

  • Thread starter Thread starter sertelt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t think there is any catholic out there that isn’t aware that Obama is a pro-abortion candidate.

It only means one thing, the issue of abortion is not that important to them, a lot of them may even agree to it.

This is the reality of it.
 
You have actually put it in a nutshell.
It is the ‘will of the people’ Yes.
It is sterile railing at politicians. Yes. Of course, the subject of this post is more towards railing against Catholic voters.
No politician is going to present himself as a proponent of a policy which the people will not accept. When you choose a candidate, you choose a package deal of issues. One can include an unpopular position on an issue if mixed with popular positions on hotter issues.
Indeed, they will lie to hide any such policies. Not always necessary to hide at all. Just mix a few bad issue positions with enough popular issue positions, and the American public will be force to drink the bitter-sweet concoction.
It is not the politicians you need to change, but the hearts of the people.Yes, as the politicians only represent the prevailing views of the people.
This can only be a slow and step-by-step process, of presenting reasonable, and acceptable alternatives. In the context of Roe v Wade, we are just seeking to return the abortion legislation to the states. Shouldn’t need a slow process at all if it were put to a referendum vote, instead of package deal candidates.
If what you present, is seen by the people at large as unreasonable, then all your arguments are not only seen as sterile, they are in fact sterile. Yes.
 
And don’t forget the large number of folks who made the racist choice of voting for/against him because he was black.
So true. It seems to me that a vote for Obama was a form of racism. The black population is dwindling due to the genocide of abortion. What is more bigoted than that.
 
I have a question that stems from this whole idea that it was acceptable for a catholic to vote for Obama. There was another world leader who was democratically elected a few decades ago that didn’t mind killing mass quantities of people. There is a difference between the two, though, and so I ask this question: If Hitler had come out before his election and said that he wanted to kill all European Jews then would your voting for him have been sin-free if you voted for Hitler because his economy worked better?

I only ask this because that’s what we did. Some embodiment of evil stepped up to the podium and said, “I’m going to take your tax dollars and kill your women and children, but I’m not George Bush.” So we voted for killing babies because the other guy was McSame. I don’t understand how a rational human can even attempt to justify this idea.
You are exactly correct. I call them dumb & numb (don’t speak & don’t feel) Catholics because they act as if the abortion issue is an academic issue. There’s a radical Pro-Lifer whose views are too militant but, his feel for the horror of this holocaust is right on. He has a video of a lion attacking a man, I suppose at a safari park, taken from within a car where the wife & children are screaming. If you turn off the sound, then you watch it and somehow you can be numb about what you see. If you turn on the sound, though, all of a sudden the spectacle makes you cringe and your emotions run high, as you hear the sheer terror & horror of those who are close to the victim. That is the problem with getting people to view the horror for what it is — the sound is off. The point of this radical Pro-Lifer, Neal Horsely, is that this is what we should be feeling for that human being that is in the womb.
 
I don’t think there is any catholic out there that isn’t aware that Obama is a pro-abortion candidate.

It only means one thing, the issue of abortion is not that important to them, a lot of them may even agree to it.

This is the reality of it.
I think there are many Catholics who weren’t aware of Obama’s Pro-abortion position because of the hierarchy’s lack of speaking. People here would have known because it was discussed VERY freely but for the average Catholic, it isn’t something that gets discussed.
 
You have actually put it in a nutshell.
It is the ‘will of the people’
It is sterile railing at politicians.
No politician is going to present himself as a proponent of a policy which the people will not accept.
Indeed, they will lie to hide any such policies.
It is not the politicians you need to change, but the hearts of the people.
This can only be a slow and step-by-step process, of presenting reasonable, and acceptable alternatives.
If what you present, is seen by the people at large as unreasonable, then all your arguments are not only seen as sterile, they are in fact sterile.
You said it better than I could. I believe as you, that
it is not the politicians you need to change, but the hearts of the people. The question and the resolution of abortion connot be settled at the voting polls. 👍 👍 👍
 
You said it better than I could. I believe as you, that
it is not the politicians you need to change, but the hearts of the people. The question and the resolution of abortion connot be settled at the voting polls. 👍 👍 👍
Joe, If there was a referendum which explicitly asked voters to say “yes” or “no” as to whether Roe v Wade should be overturned, would you say “no”? That is, return the abortion argument to the states.

My understanding is that before Roe v Wade was decided, the abortion rate was about 100,000 per year. After Roe v Wade, after a year or two warm-up period, the abortion rate increased 10 to 15 fold. Why? Because abortion clinics popped up everywhere, and abortion was promoted as a ‘responsible’ answer to an unwanted pregnancy.
 
You are exactly correct. I call them dumb & numb (don’t speak & don’t feel) Catholics because they act as if the abortion issue is an academic issue. There’s a radical Pro-Lifer whose views are too militant but, his feel for the horror of this holocaust is right on. He has a video of a lion attacking a man, I suppose at a safari park, taken from within a car where the wife & children are screaming. If you turn off the sound, then you watch it and somehow you can be numb about what you see. If you turn on the sound, though, all of a sudden the spectacle makes you cringe and your emotions run high, as you hear the sheer terror & horror of those who are close to the victim. That is the problem with getting people to view the horror for what it is — the sound is off. The point of this radical Pro-Lifer, Neal Horsely, is that this is what we should be feeling for that human being that is in the womb.
So true. I don’t know that I could support militant actions, but I do know that Obama has supported forms of infanticide. What then? If abortion or birth control somehow becomes mandatory then what do we do?
 
So true. I don’t know that I could support militant actions, but I do know that Obama has supported forms of infanticide. What then? If abortion or birth control somehow becomes mandatory then what do we do?
It could very easily go in that direction as our history progresses. The whole discourse seems to be about changing hearts & minds versus imposing Christian ideology on society by banning abortion. I think both are absolutely necessary. We not only have to stop the mass bleeding abruptly by law, but we must also change hearts & minds by uncompromisingly teaching right from wrong in our Catholic Church as the one true church. This means denying Holy Eucharist to professed abortion advocates. This means driving home the idea that killing the human being in its earliest development stage in the womb IS EQUAL to killing a person who is born at any stage in their life. It means driving home the priorities of the various political issues and, give a clear understanding of each of the issues in terms of their weight in making decisions.

Most of all, as this priest is trying to accomplish, it is to teach Catholics that when something is a grave matter, it is the grave sin of wanton neglect to not conform your views to the views of the Magisterium of the Church who speaks infallibly for Jesus Christ. To not do so, is blasphemy of the Holy Spirit which is the unforgiveable sin.
 
I think we all have to remember, when wringing our hands over why so-and-so was chosen bishop, that Jesus chose Judas to be one of his 12.

The point is that God will take evil actions and make them good. He did it at Calvary, he did it on 9/11. Everything in God’s creation is good, we just don’t have the eyes of God to see what good he’s doing.

There’s a reason Obama was allowed to be president. We don’t know it yet.

I wouldn’t have voted for Obama if he were the only man available for the job, but I know I have to have faith in God and let him work in his own way.
 
I would say that in some cases, backers of Obama should attend confession but not in all cases. But then again, who am I to disagree with a priest? :confused:
 
It could very easily go in that direction as our history progresses. The whole discourse seems to be about changing hearts & minds versus imposing Christian ideology on society by banning abortion. I think both are absolutely necessary. We not only have to stop the mass bleeding abruptly by law, but we must also change hearts & minds by uncompromisingly teaching right from wrong in our Catholic Church as the one true church. This means denying Holy Eucharist to professed abortion advocates. This means driving home the idea that killing the human being in its earliest development stage in the womb IS EQUAL to killing a person who is born at any stage in their life. It means driving home the priorities of the various political issues and, give a clear understanding of each of the issues in terms of their weight in making decisions.

Most of all, as this priest is trying to accomplish, it is to teach Catholics that when something is a grave matter, it is the grave sin of wanton neglect to not conform your views to the views of the Magisterium of the Church who speaks infallibly for Jesus Christ. To not do so, is blasphemy of the Holy Spirit which is the unforgiveable sin.
It is about changing hearts and minds. I wonder how many abortion advocates would be so vocal if they knew they’d be denied the Eucharist? Well, my hope for them is for conversion. We converted Roe (well, thank God He did) and many more. But if they’re unrepentant, then God will deal with them.
 
It is about changing hearts and minds. I wonder how many abortion advocates would be so vocal if they knew they’d be denied the Eucharist? Well, my hope for them is for conversion. We converted Roe (well, thank God He did) and many more. But if they’re unrepentant, then God will deal with them.
It is about changing hearts and minds, but it is also about saving lives right now. What statistical count do we need to have the abortion issue take precedence over economic choices.
 
I absolutely agree. The emergency brake needs to be engaged. But we all know (and some use this as an exuse to allow abortion), abortions will happen, legal or not.

Changing minds and hearts into seeing the evil of premarital, or extramarital sex, showing that this is where the evil of abortion has its roots, and then working down the line to the final result of abortion, making people see it’s a baby not a fetus-these are the things that will really impact the evil we’re talking about.
 
I absolutely agree. The emergency brake needs to be engaged. But we all know (and some use this as an exuse to allow abortion), abortions will happen, legal or not.

Changing minds and hearts into seeing the evil of premarital, or extramarital sex, showing that this is where the evil of abortion has its roots, and then working down the line to the final result of abortion, making people see it’s a baby not a fetus-these are the things that will really impact the evil we’re talking about.
Yes. How to do it other than being a good Catholic and a good example, I don’t know. It seems that the forces in our public education system and in our popular media seem to be reinforcing our free sex culture.
 
Yes. How to do it other than being a good Catholic and a good example, I don’t know. It seems that the forces in our public education system and in our popular media seem to be reinforcing our free sex culture.
It has to start at home. We need to teach children, grandchildren, and those people around us to detach from the world more. It’s impossible to do so totally, but for the most part, stop watching television, listening to the radio, going to the movies. I went to a family gathering where every kid there had some sort of Gameboy. They were sitting around playing games, not interacting with each other (except two of the girls were connected playing a pet game with each other). What ever happened to interacting with family around a meal, a little music in the background???

I recently found that detachment from individual things (my most recent example is cigarettes) and asking Jesus for help to overcome that particular thing, is a good exercise. I did it with porn, now I did it with tobacco, I’m examining to see what’s next…there’s always something.
 
It is about changing hearts and minds. I wonder how many abortion advocates would be so vocal if they knew they’d be denied the Eucharist? Well, my hope for them is for conversion. We converted Roe (well, thank God He did) and many more. But if they’re unrepentant, then God will deal with them.
Well - the ones that are instinctively rebels - meaning they are told go left and they go right just because they were told to go left - will certainly remain vocal. Sadly - that is a lot of the “I’m entitled” crowd. Some of them are so obnoxious about “their entitlements” that they would go so far as to physically force the issue if they thought it would get them their way. Then the question quickly becomes, “Now what?” It is one thing for the priest to stand up there and refuse to give them nothing more than a blessing, but what happens if they go so far as to reach into the container and try to take the host? And yes - some would do exactly that!
 
I think there are many Catholics who weren’t aware of Obama’s Pro-abortion position because of the hierarchy’s lack of speaking. People here would have known because it was discussed VERY freely but for the average Catholic, it isn’t something that gets discussed.
On the contrary I think they were very aware of it, it’s just that they don’t think it’s an important issue.

Many catholics practice contraception, many of them are pro-choice, and many of them support gay-marriages.

It’s true that in the end many will say to God, “Lord, Lord…” but God will just answer them back “Away from me…” (Matthew 7:21-23)
 
On the contrary I think they were very aware of it, it’s just that they don’t think it’s an important issue.

Many catholics practice contraception, many of them are pro-choice, and many of them support gay-marriages.

It’s true that in the end many will say to God, “Lord, Lord…” but God will just answer them back “Away from me…” (Matthew 7:21-23)
I agree with you - I think many were fully aware. They also thought it was more important to vote for Obama because he was black, because of the economy, because several of the bishops said no, or any number of other excuses. Sadly - all indicators after the election are that many of our bishops did exactly the same thing.

Many Catholics do not understand the Church’s teachings because they have been poorly catechized for the past 40 years and many priests only preach on touchy-feel, warm and fuzzy feel good stuff that has absolutely no moral relevance whatsoever. Ultimately - both of these go right back to the bishops…those who demand excellence, generally get it, and they usually have the vocations to back that up. If you doubt me - check out the following for Archbishop Burke - the diocesan seminary for the Archdiocese of St. Louis was full to overflowing when he was the archbishop there - and other orthodox bishops like Bishop Bruskewitz. Look at the religious orders that are more traditional in their approach and the ones that are more closely engaged in the “spirit of” nonsense that came out of Vatican II. Which ones are getting the vocations?

The solution - from our point - is to teach ourselves as much as we can about the faith and teach our children the same - as much as we can teach them, and instill in them the desire to continue learning. The more they know, the harder it will be for their faith to be corrupted by the woefully ignorant.
 
Actually what the bishop said was correct. The priest was wrong, if that is what he actually said. Voting for a candidate because he supports abortion is a sin.

Voting for a candidate who supports abortion, for other reasons, is not a sin. That was the statement issued by the the Conference of Bishops. It is based on moral philosophy and Catholic moral theology. Catholics were called upon to vote for the greater good.

There are two degrees of culpability, one is major and one is minor and carries no sinfulness.

Formal culpability is when one supports a position such as abortion, because it is one’s intent to use it or allow others to do so.

Material culpability is when one supports a person for other reasons and that person happens to support abortion. Materially one is associated, because one voted for that person, but one is not guilty of supporting abortion.

As the Bishop said, many people voted for this president for economic reasons, because they felt that the abortion issue was not going to be resolved at the polls no matter which way they voted. So they chose to address the economic issue and deal with the abortion issue on a different battleground. These people have no reason to go to confession. They did not vote for abortion or abortion rights.

The ideal would have been to vote for candidate who was closest to the pro life position, but that is not a guarrantee that a change would come about. If there were such a guarrantee, there would have been a moral obligation to vote for that candidate, because you must always choose the highest good that is possible. But many people do not believe that the other candidate would be able to change the status quo. They believe that it has to be taken to the States to change it. They’re probably right. An ammendment to the Constitution is hard to get by. The Supreme Court has had plenty of conservative justices over the years and abortion is still around.

I hope this clarifies what the Bishop was trying to say.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top