ConstantLearner:
I don’t think that would end harassment or abuse anywhere. Butterflies gonna fly, birds gonna sing, molesters gonna molest, no matter where they are.
We already do what you suggested. We have laws, some even carrying the death penalty, against all sorts of crimes, and people continue to commit them in ever-increasing numbers.
Of course I agree to some extent. You can’t eliminate a determined predator who is immune to the prospect of punishment. But on the other hand, let’s take another crime, say embezzlement. You don’t have a corporate culture that simply transfers an embezzler to another department or branch. You don’t have situations (I hope) where all the people in the accounting department are aware that “Steve” is embezzling, but they ignore it. And you don’t have a situation where potential, hopeful embezzlers say to themselves, “I’m going to work for Corporation X because I know I can embezzle and get away with it.” All I’m saying is you need to take immediate action as an organization to distance yourselves from criminals or all kinds.
Except for the part about the Church being a “hospital for sinners.” If Corporation X had a mandate or mission to rehabilitate embezzlers and the company merely disavowed and distanced itself from all embezzlers, treating them as untouchables, it wouldn’t be a very effective way to rehabilitate them, would it?
The world’s mandate is to write off pedophiles and be done with them. It is a modern take on the Old Testament prescription to stone those guilty of serious sin.
Where the problem really lies is with the perception that the Church not only couldn’t do much in the way of healing or saving these individuals from committing serious sin, it actually enabled those who committed serious sins to carry on without doing anything to heal or save them from themselves nor their victims from them.
The secular world’s perception of the final “solution” is a far simpler one – public exposure, trials, jailing, and compensation to the victims – the perpetrators are a lost cause that need no further attention after prosecution and trial.
For the Church, the task is not quite so simple. The eternal well-being of both the victims and the perpetrators are at stake.
Does that mean abuser priests should have been sheltered and victims left without recourse?
No. However, the solution coming from the Church should not be merely the one coming from the secular world. That simply reinforces the notion that the Church has nothing to offer beyond what the world can already provide.
As always, priests, bishops and the laity should be looking to the Holy Spirit for guidance, not relying on the world to be the infallible guide.