Catholic priest Pennsylvania scandal

  • Thread starter Thread starter CatholicGirl1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The media over the last umpty-ump years now has slowly eroded moral scrutiny. Partners, and SSA (always initials: LGBTQ), teach the children in school all about the sex habits of the alphabet (instead of the alphabet). “I have two mommies, I have two daddies”. When voices today try to lessen any attention paid to these sexual “choices”, those “born that way” get out there to support their choices. We know better and it has been taught to all through Our Lord. Don’t support and don’t advertise sinful acts. Be of courage - God is not pleased with cowards.
 
Well, that’s good, right? You don’t want him there if he’s a danger to the community.

Also, what does a kid having “two mommies” have to do with a priest breaking his vow of celibacy or committing sins of violence against children?
 
Last edited:
The two Mommies or Daddies are used to teach the children to accept this in their home. Did you not know of this? There are children’s books written for this purpose. It is being forced on society beginning with the children. Good thing Our Lord has enough millstones!

Regarding the priest being removed, nobody knows why. So, we don’t know if he was a danger or not. The secrecy and coverup must end and the prevention must be strengthened.
 
Last edited:
You do realize those 300 hundred were spread over 7 decades and almost all of the cases happened prior to 2002? The vast majority of the cases have had the statute of limitations expire. The report makes it clear that it post 2002, things have improved drastically.
 
And it has absolutely nothing to do with the crisis. The most fiery denunciations of pedophilia I’ve ever read are from LGBT people.
 
What, should the LGBTQ crowd that you say denounce pedophilia be praised? Don’t think so.
 
Flagged, because you are not only way off topic of the thread, which is about “Catholic priest Pennsylvania scandal”, not about homosexuality, but also you are getting weird and insulting as well.

Have a great day.
 
Last edited:
No, I am Catholic and one who can see corruption that needs to be removed from the Church. Collapsing, doesn’t mean dying and ending, but it does mean falling in on itself, which seems to be slowly happening. God will purge his Church.
 
Last edited:
It’s so easy to blame ‘homosexuals’ for this… but the reality isn’t so easy. There is no one single group or thing to blame except the depravity of man.

How many heterosexual people commit sexual sin? How many TV shows glorify and praise pre-marital and promiscuous relationships?

If sexual sin in and of itself is the reason for child abuse then we must blame EVERYONE, including heterosexuals who are sinning just as much (if not more since they’re ALSO using contraception).

Bearself, you are far more patient than I would have been with that one.
 
“Homosexuals” are to some Catholics today what “communists” were to Joe McCarthy.

In any event, there is no logical way to connect “homosexual” anything to priests who are molesting, raping and impregnating young girls.
 
Well, its good to know how some people think. Would not have guessed your passion for the subject ahead of answering your question. No further exchange shall be necessary. Wave the flag if you feel the need.
 
Rod Dreher was a Catholic journalist who converted to Eastern Orthodoxy.
 
ConstantLearner said:
Homosexuals do not necessarily have an obsessive need for sex
Click to expand...
From the gay men I have known throughout the years, I’d have to disagree with this statement. They were all extremely promiscuous, and made sexual references in casual conversation constantly. Do some research on studies showing how many partners the average gay man has had, most of them with people they didn’t even know.
 
bmaz said:
From the gay men I have known throughout the years, I’d have to disagree with this statement. They were all extremely promiscuous, and made sexual references in casual conversation constantly.
Click to expand...
Have you considered all the gay men that you didn’t know were gay, because they didn’t tell you? I assure you that your broad generalization is unfounded. It is surely the case that gay men are more promiscuous on average than straight men, however. The reason is obvious, I would think: more availability.
 
If I’m honest… I used to think it was actually due to abuse. Those who are sexually abused tend to express their sexuality far differently than those who aren’t (male OR female).

I’m not saying abuse causes homosexuality but when I personally meet sexually aggressive people my first thought is that they were abused at some point.

I REALIZE I AM PROBABLY WRONG> Just a different perspective.
 
I have a fair number of queer friends, mostly women but some men. These people despise anything that remotely resembles sexual abuse, rape, harassment, or the normalization thereof. As much as they might be misguided on other issues, their willingness to condemn even those on their side is refreshing.
 
Been my experience too. The people in my life who SUPPORTED these kinds of sins were all heterosexual.
 
I’ve never asked a gay man about his sex life, but by the same token, none have ever volunteered any information about their sex lives. If they are more active than straight men, that’s probably because men are more willing to do whatever than women are. Therefore, maybe the gay men are as active as the straight men would be if the straight men were gay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top