V
Via_Dolorosa
Guest
Thank you for your informative synopsis. Can anyone argue with this?I have to disagree with your comments. You’ve simply read your prejudices into what Bishop Dowling was talking about and in the process ignored what the entire article is really all about.
Speaking from a South African perspective which I suspect none of us on this thread knows the least about, he rails against centralized authority that is so rigid that local churches (i.e. national synods) aren’t given enough freedom to address issues of concern for their countries or their dioceses. The tools are there - principles of Catholic social teaching. What’s apparently lacking in Dowling’s view is the freedom to apply them to their own situation.
It’s viritually impossible for people in this country to grasp what issues are of significant concern in other countries. That’s what Catholic social teaching is there for - to provide the local church with the means to read the signs of the time in their context.
His introductory comments are intended to call into question a form of traditionalism that fails to recognize the tremendous damage done in many countries by the sex abuse scandal. Unfortunately, the bishops in many countries lost all kinds of moral credibility because of it. To pretend that wearing elaborate liturigcal vestments will translate into authentic worship is absurd - that’s his point.
Another thread on this post seems to discount what young adults are searching for. On one hand Dowling speaks of his pastoral experience in Europe where young, well-educated adults are profoundly aware of grave injustices in the world and are searching for something or someone to help rally support for their concerns. On the other hand he also mentions the other phenomenon of the attraction of young adults to the more traditional spiritual and moral guidance of the church. He didn’t dismiss it. He simply implies that Catholic social teaching will be a draw for many. And from my experience that is definitely true. We really have a lot to offer for young adults, their interests and their passions. Young adults are the future of the church. To simply dismiss their concerns is to shoot Christ’s church in the foot.
His comments re: the prohibition of discussion by the Vatican of topics like married clergy or the ordination of women were intended as examples of where there has been a reactionary backlash in the church starting from the Roman curia who are apparently unable or unwilling to listen. Somehow some in the curia believe that talking about such things is going to stop people from discussing them. It’s as one person observed “the battered wives syndrome”…beat somebody down long enough to silence them and then pretend there is no problems.
For those on this thread who dismiss such concerns that he raises then you are challenged to offer a way of drawing a wide group of people - young adults - into the church. Wearing elaborate liturgical garments is hardly appealing on any score.
Re: rags - hmmm - one of the few persons to recieve a stigmata Francis of Assisi was not known to concern himself with elaborate liturgical dress. While respectful liturgical garments are necessary - a retreat into the past with greater concern for outlandish liturgical wear - and it doesn’t matter whether its donated or not (BTW - I wonder what the person’s intentions and priorities are in paying such elaborate sums for liturgical wear - it wouldn’t be the first time that weathly donors tried to control the church and undermine its’ spiritual and moral leadership) does very little to lead a person to authentic holiness.
Finally, as Dowling notes at the conclusion of his talk - the real crisis is bridging the gap between traditionalists and so-called progressives. Talking past each other has unfortunately become an ingrained habit. Belittling or pointing accusatory fingers at those who believe a whole host of issues are not being addressed constructively does nothing. It only becomes yet another way of pretending to live in an stable church when in fact deeper questions (and here I’m not simply talking of ordination issues) are left unattended.
Marriages on the rocks don’t suddenly fix themselves when the couple involved don’t talk to each other. Bumpy roads in the life of the church aren’t going to disappear because significant matters are no longer talked about either.