K
Kaninchen
Guest
The Church certainly did in Spain.It seems in my opinion that Catholics could be allowed to support certain aspects of fascism.
The Church certainly did in Spain.It seems in my opinion that Catholics could be allowed to support certain aspects of fascism.
These are also characteristics of communist regimes.ultranationalism, totalitarianism, and scapegoating of the “Other”.
That depends on what stage of the process (including the pre-Civil War era) you’re looking at. Certainly any alternative would have meant the diminution of Church power and wealth in Spain.That’s because the realistic alternative in Spain at that time was a Communist regime.
No, Mussolini’s party was called the National Fascist Party (Partito Nazionale Fascista).The actual name of the party was “Movimento Sociale Italiano”.
It does. They’re the bourgeois, the capitalists, the imperialists and any counterrevolutionary. Ah, also, religion (every religion) is “the opium of the people” according to orthodox Marxists.Communism does not officially designate an opposing “Other” group to whom all evils are attributed, such as Nazism and it’s view of the Jews.
Point conceded.They’re the bourgeois, the capitalists, the imperialists and any counterrevolutionary
The only complication is the desperate desire of some on the Right to pretend that history can be reshaped in such a way as to be always able to blame somebody else.maybe politics is more complicated than a one dimensional line?
As someone who would like the USA to have a stronger welfare state, economic policy and statist policy don’t always go hand in hand, nor do they need be measured on the same political axis. National Socialists/fascists are hardly economic neo-liberals (free market). They preached an hierarchical society, but a collectivist one, too.Wesrock:
The only complication is the desperate desire of some on the Right to pretend that history can be reshaped in such a way as to be always able to blame somebody else.maybe politics is more complicated than a one dimensional line?
They certainly didn’t believe in state ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange which, to a European, defines ‘socialism’.National Socialists/fascists are hardly economic neo-liberals (free market).
Very old world conservative. In the USA what is conservative has a different meaning. On a scale with an absolutely free and unregulated market on the right and collectively owned property on the left, the Nazi’s typically fall to the left of where the USA and many European countries fall.Wesrock:
They certainly didn’t believe in state ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange which, to a European, defines ‘socialism’.National Socialists/fascists are hardly economic neo-liberals (free market).
Incidentally, the NSDAP wanted to ‘return’ to a world of peasant smallholder/artisan production in the “Tausendjähriges Reich.”
On a scale with what actually happened and what people at the time thought on the one hand and what is convenient to political propaganda within the USA today on the other hand, all that is revealed is that American Conservatives fall into the category of supporters of reactionary plutocracy.In the USA what is conservative has a different meaning.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master – – that’s all.”
Read Antony Beevor’s book The Battle for Spain, particularly the chapters on the Red and White Terrors. The Whites killed way more.That’s because the realistic alternative in Spain at that time was a Communist regime.