I
igor32kiev
Guest
I like both Catholics and freemasons. Is it possible to be both a Catholic and a freemason?
Absolutely not! As Catholics we only have one master: the Trinity.I like both Catholics and freemasons. Is it possible to be both a Catholic and a freemason?
Yes, I also agree with you. It seems to me that Freemasons are much the same as Jesuits in a way that they except multiple manifestations of God. And they are very democratic in their elective procedures, unlike Catholics in general. They also do really help each other in diffucult moment and I can put it in contrast with Catholics from whom personally I received no assistance at all. Freemasons are former Catholic monks themselves for they stem from The Knights of Temple, a Catholic Order that was slandered by bad men in Catholic Church and declared heretics.The Freemasons accept multiple manifistations of God. Christianity does not. The official teaching on Jesus Christ is that he was not divine. He was a man only. There is one degree in the Scottish rite where the initiate denounces the salvation of Christ. If a police officer who is a mason knows of a fellow mason who is a criminal, he is obligated to keep the secret. If he has a warrent for him the officer must give the criminal a warning he is comming.
I know what I am talking about.
Freemasons are former Catholic monks themselves for they stem from The Knights of Temple, a Catholic Order that was slandered by bad men in Catholic Church and declared heretics.
noI like both Catholics and freemasons. Is it possible to be both a Catholic and a freemason?
please provide evidence of what you say here. I have never seen any thing that has been put out by the church that would make it ok to be a mason. Pope John Paul II with in the first year of his becoming Pope restated that Catholic where to have nothing to do with the Masons. It has never been and unless the Masons make drastic changes in their basic principals will never be ok for a catholic to be a mason. I is not a witch hunt it is a desire to keep the faithfully from being envolved in anti Christian groups.Yes, I also agree with you. It seems to me that Freemasons are much the same as Jesuits in a way that they except multiple manifestations of God. And they are very democratic in their elective procedures, unlike Catholics in general. They also do really help each other in diffucult moment and I can put it in contrast with Catholics from whom personally I received no assistance at all. Freemasons are former Catholic monks themselves for they stem from The Knights of Temple, a Catholic Order that was slandered by bad men in Catholic Church and declared heretics.
As it appeared just a few decades ago, all acusations against them were lifted by independant Catholic committee apointed by Pope. And in 1983 they were not listed among heretics any more, no Catholic Church document since has ever described them as dangerous anti-Catholic organization and they were simply not mentioned at all if not for a letter by Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith issued by then Cardinal Ratzinger which unlawfully denied them communion and it contradicted all church canons which had more superior importance.
Many people among Cardinals in 1970s and early 1980s were Freemasons, even State Secretary of Vatican himself (Prime Minister) and what can be called as Minister of Finance (Head of Institute for Religious Affairs). What we have now is a second turn of the witch hunt, a detraction from Enlightenment path chosen by Church since Second Vatican Council, and persecution of the innocents.
You need to read the actual cannon Law. Being a member in good standing of the FreeMasons removes your ability to receive Communion. This is from the wiki site you postedIf you are interested to get a full insight into the controversy of masons belonging to Catholic Church, you can see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry_and_Catholicism
Here it is written that new Canon Law 1983 does not prohibit freemasonry. And Canon Law is a supreme law of Catholic Church, as we can see from proclamation of Pope Jaun Paul II that issued it according to principles of Second Vatican Council: vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_25011983_sacrae-disciplinae-leges_en.html
You can read of Prime Minister of Vatican who was a member of masonic lodge: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Marie_Villot
Here you can read of masonic lodge that he was a member of: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due
And here you can also read of Finance Minister of Vatican who was also a freemason and remained in this position up until 1989: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marcinkus
This was followed by the 1983 document Quaesitum est, issued by Pope John Paul II. To quote:
“The faithful, who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion…”[35]
Sorry, if you join, you are in a state of sin.This is the authoritative interpretation of the Vatican’s position on this subject.
You really are clueless and by the way since when was Wikipedia an authoritative Church document. Give me a break! If you really are a Catholic, which I doubt, then you would be reading Church documents so you can know what the teachings are. If Wikipedia is your only source of research and information you would be advised never to make any comments.If you are interested to get a full insight into the controversy of masons belonging to Catholic Church, you can see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry_and_Catholicism
Here it is written that new Canon Law 1983 does not prohibit freemasonry. And Canon Law is a supreme law of Catholic Church, as we can see from proclamation of Pope Jaun Paul II that issued it according to principles of Second Vatican Council: vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_25011983_sacrae-disciplinae-leges_en.html
You can read of Prime Minister of Vatican who was a member of masonic lodge: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Marie_Villot
Here you can read of masonic lodge that he was a member of: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due
And here you can also read of Finance Minister of Vatican who was also a freemason and remained in this position up until 1989: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marcinkus
I know you did not address this to me. I’m just sitting next to you (figuretively speaking) and giving you an elbow nudge saying “the reason you have never seen anything put out by the Church that would make it ok to be a mason is because der ain’t nuttin”please provide evidence of what you say here. I have never seen any thing that has been put out by the church that would make it ok to be a mason. …
I will try one more time to explain. If you are a member in good standing with the FreeMasons, cannon law prohibits you from receiving communion. There. Now, can you be a CAtholic in good standing and not go to communion?In his document issued against Freemasonry John Paul II did not specify that he was using his infallible power. The last infallible decision was issued in 1950:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility
So, as you see 1983 Canon Code is of superior importance over this decision by Pope, because it was issued as a result of a decision of Second Vatican Council to make some improvements in Church Law. All decisions of Ecumenical Councils are infallible in any case.
It means that it is not obligatory for a Catholic to accept this decision of Pope and as Freemasonry is not banned by 1983 Canon Code you can be both a Catholic and a Freemason if you like. Are you sure that it was only “editorial ommitment” that caused Freemasonry not to be included in a list of anti-Church organizations? Maybe, a more deep insight of Council Elders into this problem was revealed to us by 1983 Canon Code. It was no more than a direct saying: Freemasonry is allowed.
Are you joking?Here it is written that new Canon Law 1983 does not prohibit freemasonry. And Canon Law is a supreme law of Catholic Church, as we can see from proclamation of Pope Jaun Paul II that issued it according to principles of Second Vatican Council: vatican.va/holy_father/jo…-leges_en.html