T
twb1621
Guest
unfortunately I have seen it…Do you know that actually happened or are you speculating?
unfortunately I have seen it…Do you know that actually happened or are you speculating?
I have the tendency to agree with you. Extremely strong feelings on abortion such as this tend to be rooted in the individuals personal life and personal choices, choices that they have walked into on their own violation or have been thrust upon them. For these poor souls, to be pro-life is a condemnation of themselves. For being a part of such an act, or even a silent by-stander; they have justified their actions in such a way as to make them supporters of abortion, and therefore satisfy the crying out of their conscience. These souls need help in finding a way to forgive themselves and find their way back to the arms of our savior.unfortunately I have seen it…
No, I am not looking to bait you or anyone for that matter. Anyone who has intimately been involved with the act of abortion must be made aware that with sincerity of heart in repentance, no sin is stronger than the forgiveness and mercy of God. Those of us who are strong in the commitment against such violations of the love of God must make our devotion to the love and Truth that is our Lord a visible part of our life style so that others who may need to see Catholics true to their faith before gaining the strength themselves to make such a commitment have that support to stand with them. Sorry if that was a bit winded… Those who are repentant are surely forgiven with such a commitment as Jesus himself showed many times. We are never to hate the sinner but only the sin and none of us are without sin. Therefore, we are that support group but others must be able to see us just as is said in gospel, the Church must be visible.I have the tendency to agree with you. Extremely strong feelings on abortion such as this tend to be rooted in the individuals personal life and personal choices, choices that they have walked into on their own violation or have been thrust upon them. For these poor souls, to be pro-life is a condemnation of themselves. For being a part of such an act, or even a silent by-stander; they have justified their actions in such a way as to make them supporters of abortion, and therefore satisfy the crying out of their conscience. These souls need help in finding a way to forgive themselves and find their way back to the arms of our savior.
That and the fact that abortion is not an issue in light of abstinence. With abstinence there is no need for abortion, only counseling and some medical intervention in case of rape, ectopic pregnancy and the like (I don’t think that we need to go farther into this issue, please do not try to bait me).
Currently only one human being has walked this earth who can say that pregnancy resulted in spite of abstinence; and aren’t we glad she did not choose abortion?![]()
How do you know why such a person walked out? Did you talk to them afterwards and they told you the reasons or are you just making assumptions.unfortunately I have seen it…
going by the looks of disgust, rolling of eyes and shaking of head during the homily and the fact that the person finally just got up before the homily was over and walked out of the Church, they were not shy of wanting their displeasure known . Of course it had to do with abortion and Obhama’s standing on the matter.How do you know why such a person walked out? Did you talk to them afterwards and they told you the reasons or are you just making assumptions.
I wonder if some of these people realize just what the choice is they are making…Getting up and walking out of church during a homily is one of the most disrespectful things I’ve heard of. If the person feels that strongly about abortion then hopefully they never come back to a Catholic Church. You can’t be a Catholic abortionist. If the loyalty to Obama is greater than the Church then we’re all better off without such members of the faithful.
I’m sorry, but I’m going to have to disagree with you on the Church being in personal politics. A well-informed conscience means that the Church should be a part of every part of our lives – including and especially politics.Every single time I’ve seen Catholics walk out of church over a sermon it was invariably a sermon that was attempting to improperly insert the Church into personal politics.
As I said above, a well-formed conscience means that Church teaching goes everywhere in our lives. We, as Catholics, are to live our lives according to the Church’s teachings. If you (generic you, not you personally) don’t like it, no one is keeping you here.In my experience its when overzealous priests cut corners on Church teaching and take it beyond where it actually goes.
A recent example is the fellow in (I believe S.C.) who told his parishioners that if they voted for Obama they needed to go to confession before he would give them the Eucharist.
I’m inclined to agree with the priest who told his parishioners that they needed to go to confession if they voted for Obama. I don’t believe there is any good reason that anyone who is a serious Catholic and truly seeks to follow what the Church teaches regarding abortion could have voted for Obama in good conscience and without committing a grave sin. Even if you disagreed with McCain’s stance on certain issues and couldn’t in good conscience vote for him either, there were other alternatives and one can also abstain from voting altogether if there is no acceptable candidate. To actively support a pro-abortion candidate and say that what s/he believes regarding abortion isn’t why you’re voting for him/her but you’re voting for him/her based on the other issues (I’ve heard this excuse from a number of Catholics who voted for Obama and even actively campaigned for him) is not a good enough reason to vote for a pro-abortion candidate. A lot of people will disagree with me, probably, but I’m just putting it like the Church puts it. Basically, if all the candidates are pro-abortion, THEN and ONLY THEN can you use other issues to decide your vote. Abortion is the issue that pretty much trumps all the other issues – war, the economy, education, health care, etc. Does it mean that every candidate who is anti-abortion is a viable candidate? No. It means that if there is one candidate who is pro-abortion and another who is anti-abortion, then you must use abortion as your determining factor for voting. This is what it means when people say that Catholics are not “one issue voters.” We ARE allowed to use other issues to determine who we vote for so long as the candidates among whom we’re choosing are all equal in their stance on abortion. Obama and McCain were NOT equal and Obama was not only pro-abortion but, IMHO, rabidly pro-abortion.Another would be a deacon at my Church who told the parishioners that anyone with a Kerry sticker on his car was in a state of mortal sin.
You want to know one of the biggest reasons abortion happens? Because it is convenient. It is legal and available in most places in the US and not only that, it’s funded by the government to a certain extent. Planned Parenthood funds abortions quite a lot in this country and provides them in certain locations. If a woman gets pregnant and doesn’t want the baby, no problem! Get an abortion! The convenient accessibility of abortion also makes it easier for boyfriends, husbands, parents, and friends who think a woman doesn’t need a baby she’s carrying to pressure her into an abortion that she may not want.If we want to end abortion, we need to carefully study the reasons it happens and attitudes that permit it, then address those reasons and attitudes.
Unfortunately, I know several Catholic and non Catholics Christian women who are pro-choice. We are all in our early 40s/late 30s. All are weekly mass/service attenders.I gotta be honest, I really don’t know any catholics…even the luke warm catholics that most here despise, who defend the practice of abortion. I reads posts on CAF about how catholics today try to justify abortion, but I just don’t see it. Perhaps it is just b/c I live in the bible belt, but I see no significant contingent of catholics who feel abortion is ok.
I do see many catholics who don’t see it as a priority in assessing political candidates’ fitness to serve.
–Rico
You are absolutely on the target. The distance we Christians (I speak most directly regarding Catholics) grew away from our faith since the 1960’s is astronomical when you look back on it. It first began as a personal separation in the whole peace and love, sex, drugs and rock and roll mentality. Then it became complacency by many in standing back not wanting to openly get involved in fighting issues we didn’t necessarily support then further grew into a lack of moral limitations, enjoying the convenience of things such as artificial birth control over abstinence and such as that. Today many Christians of all denominations live as though it is more morally acceptable to have an abortion than to practice abstinence and many since it’s been legally recognized take abortion so lightly that they have multiple abortions yet fail to even practice birth control. Yet if we returned to our morality and defended our Christian teachings there is no politician in the country that would chance loosing re-election knowing the majority (which we are) would not support him or her. So it truly is our responsibility if we vote for them.Unfortunately, I know several Catholic and non Catholics Christian women who are pro-choice. We are all in our early 40s/late 30s. All are weekly mass/service attenders.
However, we are from a “lost generation” born in the 60s. Please pray for my friends!
I’m afraid your reply indicates pretty clearly that you don’t understand my point. It had nothing to do with conscience. It had to do with people who attempt to misrepresent (at best) or lie (at worst) about Church teaching to try to force their personal beliefs on others and calling it Catholicism.As I said above, a well-formed conscience means that Church teaching goes everywhere in our lives. We, as Catholics, are to live our lives according to the Church’s teachings. If you (generic you, not you personally) don’t like it, no one is keeping you here.
So clearly it is possible that a well-informed Catholic could indeed have voted for Obama (and before him Kerry) without sinning if he or she did so for other reasons, reasons that the individual Catholic considered proportionate.“When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favor of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.”
The Pope disagrees with both of you. It is not your place to tell other Catholics what they should and shouldn’t find to be proporotionate reasons. Just as it isn’t the pllace of others to dictate the terms of your personal conscience to you.I’m inclined to agree with the priest who told his parishioners that they needed to go to confession if they voted for Obama. I don’t believe there is any good reason that anyone who is a serious Catholic and truly seeks to follow what the Church teaches regarding abortion could have voted for Obama in good conscience and without committing a grave sin.
is simply, incorrect. That is not what the Church teaches. Charity compels me to believe that you are simply misinformed. But it is a serious problem when people misrepresent (intentionally or unintentionally) the teaching of the Church to suit their own personal views and use that misrepresentation as a stick to accuse others of sin.I’m just putting it like the Church puts it. Basically, if all the candidates are pro-abortion, THEN and ONLY THEN can you use other issues to decide your vote. Abortion is the issue that pretty much trumps all the other issues – war, the economy, education, health care, etc.
The truth is Obama was the most pro-abortion senator in history. It may have been the only legislation he didn’t vote “Present”. Any well informed voter should have known that. By lifting all requirements he is essentially condoning infanticide - state sanctioned murder- and anyone who voted for him has blood on their hands.IMy main point is about overzealous people who are either careless with their assertions (at best) or willingly lie to advance their personal belief systems (at worst), so not expect me to support abortion in the debate, but I do strongly believe in carefully researching and telling the truth about complex situations.
I must agree with this. Obama made no secret as to his stand on abortion. Others were more inconsistent in their votes and in their rhetoric, but he left no margin to guess where his feelings lie. He was and continues to be very clearly pro-abortion. Nobody should act so surprised.The truth is Obama was the most pro-abortion senator in history. It may have been the only legislation he didn’t vote “Present”. Any well informed voter should have known that. By lifting all requirements he is essentially condoning infanticide - state sanctioned murder- and anyone who voted for him has blood on their hands.
You want to know one of the biggest reasons abortion happens? Because it is convenient. It is legal and available in most places in the US and not only that, it’s funded by the government to a certain extent. Planned Parenthood funds abortions quite a lot in this country and provides them in certain locations. If a woman gets pregnant and doesn’t want the baby, no problem! Get an abortion! The convenient accessibility of abortion also makes it easier for boyfriends, husbands, parents, and friends who think a woman doesn’t need a baby she’s carrying to pressure her into an abortion that she may not want.I’m afraid your reply indicates pretty clearly that you don’t understand my point. It had nothing to do with conscience. It had to do with people who attempt to misrepresent (at best) or lie (at worst) about Church teaching to try to force their personal beliefs on others and calling it Catholicism.
A perfect example is Fr Newman’s overreach in the wake of President Obama’s election. The current Pope has said:
So clearly it is possible that a well-informed Catholic could indeed have voted for Obama (and before him Kerry) without sinning if he or she did so for other reasons, reasons that the individual Catholic considered proportionate.
The Pope disagrees with both of you. It is not your place to tell other Catholics what they should and shouldn’t find to be proporotionate reasons. Just as it isn’t the pllace of others to dictate the terms of your personal conscience to you.
Furthermore, when Fr Newman claims his parishioners were in a state of mortal sin because they voted for Obama, he was in fact committing the sin of calumney
Similarly, your assertion:
is simply, incorrect. That is not what the Church teaches. Charity compels me to believe that you are simply misinformed. But it is a serious problem when people misrepresent (intentionally or unintentionally) the teaching of the Church to suit their own personal views and use that misrepresentation as a stick to accuse others of sin.
.
Those proportionate reasons must be objective, not subjective. The Pope did not say we each get to come up with private rationalizations. He was simply restating traditional moral theology.So clearly it is possible that a well-informed Catholic could indeed have voted for Obama (and before him Kerry) without sinning if he or she did so for other reasons, reasons that the individual Catholic considered proportionate.
“proportionate reasons” cannot possibly be objective. Do you really not think (then) Cardinal Ratzinger was incapable of saying “No Catholic can vote for a pro-choice politician if a pro-life one in running”? If that is what he meant, if that was Catholic teaching, that’s what he would have said, don’t you think?Those proportionate reasons must be objective, not subjective. The Pope did not say we each get to come up with private rationalizations. He was simply restating traditional moral theology.