Which is why people need to be shown what abortion is. Contrary to the notion that graphic images depicting the horror of abortion is offensive and not needed, I have found the premise of “I didn’t know that this is what abortion actually does to a baby” to be quite commonplace.
Muddy waters has made this issue what it is WORDS without a single solution and if this is not enough it is steadily getting worse.
We could end abortion this November if ALL Catholics refused to vote for anyone who supported abortion.
And to those who say the pictures are “too graphic,” I say, “If your eye cannot bear to see what your hand has done, you should have stayed your hand.”
No we can’t…because someone will get voted in. I don’t know how old you are but the only way we can end this is to get militant. Not a “once” a year protest in Washington DC. Although praying in front of abortion killing mills dissuades a heart entering it is not enough. But if we want to end the killing of the voiceless we need to get in the streets in a unrelenting and peaceful fashion. We need to stop being passive. The church is militant we fail to remember that. If you are a sports fan a FULL COURT PRESS. We are fools to believe this issue will come to an end any other way.
It is most certainly true, because the only reason pro-abortion representatives get elected is that enough Catholics either vote for them or fail to vote against them.
My blood is boiling it is this statement about the pictures another way to muddy the waters. Evil/darkness sits on the side as we answer give any attention of answering this stupidity {this cause a comment}. The head in the sand mentality/do not disrupt my apple cart is moving the focus OFF the VOICELESS the issue. We to move this to the streets an in your face until everyday when news hits airwaves there will be the voiceless defenders. Who are we kidding to think we can end this any other way…
This will never end in the vote…Militant we have to be MILITANT…
Perhaps you are reading the USCCB use of the term “pro choice” as if it meant the same thing as it means when used by the pro abortion people. It does not. The USCCB statement is referring to the overall use of free choice in choosing the good.
It is this statement that always changes the tide of the issue moving us off the focus of the killing of the innocent voiceless. We do not speak of them. Who is protecting their rights? They have God given rights. A loving God hates murder. Abortion is murder. Suffering is a part of life. Take up your cross and follow me thus said the Lord. The cross speaks of suffering. We have the duty and right to protect the innocent voiceless to say otherwise endangers the soul.
All laws force our beleifs on others. And you dont really think abortion is wrong. If you did you would be fighting it with all your heartand soul rather than rationalizing it and/or making excuses for those who do it.
someone eariler hit the nail right on the head. do we really have the right to force our beflics on others? we can believe rape is wrong (which I do) but our we so blind to think that a loving god would really punish a man who wanted to have sex?
In the case of rape, the child is as much a victim as the mother. Rape is the only crime with a death penalty for the victim.
You kill the child to protect its health!
Former Surgeon General Everett Koop said in his entire live he never had a case where abortion was necessary to save the mother’s life.
OPRESS THEM!!! Are you painting abortion apologists as victims?
An unborn child is living, has human DNA, and has its own DNA.
So if you were suffering from a horrible diease and would die a painful death, it would be okay for someone else to decide to put you to death?
We are debating semantics as usual. Come on don’t frustrate the old lady.
These “old ladies” use semantics like a mugger uses a knife – to kill the innocent.
I:thumbsup: LOVE YOU
And I love you. But I’m already married.
